Chapter 11 Multiple sources of information influence time-to-contact judgments: Do heuristics accommodate limits in sensory and cognitive processes?

Advances in Psychology

Volumn 135, Issue C, 2004, Pages 243-285

  DeLucia, Patricia R ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43449117861     PISSN: 01664115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(04)80013-X     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Ames A. Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window. Psychological Monographs 65 No. 324 (1951)
2. Anderson N.H. Algebraic models in perception. In: Carterette E.C., and Friedman M.P. (Eds). Handbook of perception: Psychophysical judgment and measurement (1974), Academic Press, NY 215-298
3. Best C.J., Crassini B., and Day R.H. The roles of static depth information and objectimage relative motion in perception of heading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 884-901
4. Braunstein M.L. Depth perception through motion (1976), Academic Press, NY
5. Brooks L.R. The suppression of visualization by reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (1967) 289-299
6. Bruno N., and Cutting J.E. Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Ps 117 (1988) 161-170
7. Caird J.K., and Hancock P.A. The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology 6 (1994) 83-109
8. Cavallo V., and Laurent M. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception 17 (1988) 623-632
9. Cavallo V., Mestre D., and Berthelon C. Time-to-collision judgements: Visual and spatiotemporal factors. In: Rothengatter T., and Vaya E.C. (Eds). Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application (1997), Pergamon, Amsterdam 97-111
10. Cooper L.A. Mental models of the structure of visual objects. In: Shepp B.E., and Ballesteros S. (Eds). Object perception: Structure and process (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
11. Cooper L.A., and Shepard R.N. Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In: Chase W.G. (Ed). Visual Information Processing (1973), Academic Press, NY 75-176
12. Coren S., and Girgus J.S. Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions (1978), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
13. Cowan N. Evolving conceptions of memory storage selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin 104 (1988) 163-191
14. Cutting J.E., and Vishton P.M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W., and Rogers S. (Eds). Perception of space and motion. 2nd ed. Series: Handbook of Perception and Cognition (1995), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 69-117
15. Cutting J.E., and Wang R.F. Heading judgements in minimal environments: The value of a heuristic when invariants are rare. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1146-1159
16. (UMI No. 9020517). DeLucia P.R. Pictorial depth cues and motion-produced information for depth perception. Dissertation Abstracts International 51 3 (1989) 1526B
17. DeLucia P.R. Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 738-748
18. DeLucia P.R. Small near objects can appear farther than large far objects during object motion and self motion: Judgments of object-self and object-object collisions. In: Beek P.J., Bootsma R.J., and van Wieringen P.C.W. (Eds). Studies in perception and action: Posters presented at the VIth international conference on event perception and action (1991), Rodopi, Amsterdam 94-100
19. DeLucia P.R. Effects of pictorial relative size and ground-intercept information on judgments about potential collisions in perspective displays. Human Factors 37 (1995) 528-538
20. DeLucia P.R. Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 1168-1177
21. th Annual Meeting (2001), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA
22. DOI 10.1167/2.7.348. DeLucia P.R. Judgments of time to contact when an approaching object is partially concealed by a static or moving occluder. Journal of Vision 2 7 (2002) 348a. http://www.journalofvision.org/2/7/348/
23. rd Annual Meeting (1999), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA
24. DeLucia P.R., and Cochran E.L. Perceptual information for batting can be extracted throughout a ball's trajectory. Perceptual and Motor Skills 61 (1985) 143-150
25. DeLucia P.R., Kaiser M.K., Bush J.M., Meyer L.E., and Sweet B.T. Information integration in judgments about time to contact. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 41 (2000) 798
26. DeLucia P.R., Kaiser M.K., Bush J.M., Meyer L.E., and Sweet B.T. Information integration in judgments of time to contact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A 57A 7 (2003) 1165-1189
27. DOI 10.1167/1.3.312. DeLucia P.R., Kaiser M.K., Garcia A., and Sweet B.T. Effects of relative size and height in field on absolute judgments of time to contact [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 1 3 (2001) 321a. http://www.journalofvision.org/1/3/312
28. DeLucia P.R., and Liddell G.W. Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 901-914
29. DeLucia P.R., and Meyer L.E. Judgments about the time to contact between two objects during simulated self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1813-1833
30. th Annual Meeting (2002), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA
31. DeLucia P.R., and Novak J.B. Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method. Perception & Psychophysics 59 (1997) 913-928
32. DeLucia P.R., Tresilian J.R., and Meyer L.E. Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 552-567
33. DeLucia P.R., and Warren R. Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 783-798
34. Duncan J., and Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96 (1989) 433-458
35. Epstein W., Park J., and Casey A. The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin 58 (1961) 491-514
36. Flach J.M., Allen B.L., Brickman B.J., and Hutton R.J.B. Dynamic occlusion: Active versus passive observers. Insight: The Visual Performance Technical Group Newsletter 14 (1992) 5-7
37. Gibson J.J. Observations on active touch. Psychological Review 69 (1962) 477-491
38. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems (1966), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
39. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
40. Gilbert C.D. Plasticity in visual perception and physiology. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6 (1996) 269-274
41. Gilden D.L., and Proffitt D.R. Understanding collision dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 372-383
42. Gray R., and Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research 38 (1998) 499-512
43. Gray R., and Regan D. Do monocular time-to-collision estimates necessarily involve perceived distance?. Perception 28 (1999) 1257-1264
44. Gray R., and Regan D. Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Current Biology 10 (2000) 587-590
45. Grutzmacher R.P., Geri G.A., and Pierce B.J. Time-to-contact estimates for observer versus target motion. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human factors and Ergonomics Society (2000), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA
46. Hancock P.A., and Manser M.P. Time-to contact: More than tau alone. Ecological Psychology 9 (1997) 265-297
47. Hastorf A.H. The influence of suggestion on the relationship between stimulus size and perceived distance. Journal of Psychology 29 (1950) 195-217
48. Hecht H. Heuristics and invariants in dynamic event perception: Immunized concepts or nonstatements?. Psychometric Bulletin & Review 3 (1996) 61-70
49. Hecht H., Kaiser M.K., Savelsbergh G.J.P., and van der Kamp J. The impact of spatio-temporal sampling on time-to-contact judgements. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 650-666
50. Hochberg J. Higher-order stimuli and inter-response coupling in the perception of the visual world. In: Gibson J.J., MacLeod R.B., and Pick H.L. (Eds). Perception: Essays in honor of J.J. Gibson (1974), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 17-39
51. Hochberg J. Perception. 2nd ed. (1978), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
52. Hochberg J. How big is a stimulus?. In: Beck J. (Ed). Organization and representation in perception (1982), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 191-217
53. Hochberg J. Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In: Boff K., Thomas J., and Kaufman L. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance (1986), Wiley, Toronto 22
54. Hochberg J. Machines should not see as people do, but must know how people see. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 37 (1987) 221-237
55. Hochberg J.E., and Beck J. Apparent spatial arrangement and perceived brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (1954) 263-266
56. Hochberg J., and Beer J. Illusory rotations from self-produced motion: The Ames window effect in static objects. Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association 62 (1991), Eastern Psychological Association, Glassboro, NJ
57. Hochberg J., and DeLucia P. The perception of real surfaces' real motions varies with perceived orientation of reversible objects drawn on them: Real and virtual space interact. Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association 57 (1986), Eastern Psychological Association, Glassboro, NJ
58. Hochberg C.B., and Hochberg J.E. Familiar size and the perception of depth. Journal of Psychology 34 (1952) 107-114
59. Hochberg J., and Peterson M.A. Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (1987) 370-380
60. Ittelson W.H. Size as a cue to distance: Static localization. American Journal of Psychology 64 (1951) 54-67
61. Ittelson W.H. Size as a cue to distance: Radial motion. American Journal of Psychology 64 (1951) 188-202
62. Kahneman D. Attention and effort (1973), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
63. Kaiser M.K., and Mowafy L. Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 1028-1040
64. Kebeck G., and Landwehr K. Optical magnification as event information. Psychological Research 54 (1992) 146-159
65. Kerzel D., Hecht H., and Kim N. Image velocity, not tau, explains arrival-time judgments from global optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1540-1555
66. Kilpatrick F.P., and Ittelson W.H. Three demonstrations involving the visual perception of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (1951) 394-402
67. Law D.J., Pellegrino J.W., Mitchell S.R., Fischer S.C., McDonald T.P., and Hunt E.B. Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 1183-1199
68. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5 (1976) 437-459
69. Lee D.N. The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B-290 (1980) 169-179
70. Lee D.N., and Young D.S. Visual timing of interceptive action. In: Ingle D.J., Jeannerod M., and Lee D.N. (Eds). Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (1985), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1-30
71. (UMI No. 9812032). Liddell G.W. Interfering and updating cognitive representations used in judgments of absolute time-to-contact in a prediction motion task. Dissertation Abstracts International 58 10 (1998) 5678B
72. Manser M.P., and Hancock P.A. Influence of approach angle on estimates of time-to-contact. Ecological Psychology 8 (1996) 71-99
73. (UMI No. 3015713). Meyer L.E. The effects of retinal eccentricity on judgments about collisions. Dissertation Abstracts International 62 05 (2001) 2523B
74. Morgan M.J. Analogue models of motion perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B290 (1980) 117-135
75. (UMI No. 9812047). Novak J.B. Judgments of absolute time-to-contact in multiple object displays: Evaluating the role of cognitive process in arrival-time judgements. Dissertation Abstracts International 58 10 (1998) 5679B
76. Peterson M.A., and Hochberg J. Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and attention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9 (1983) 183-193
77. Previc F.H. The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 123-164
78. Regan D., and Hamstra S.J. Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Research 33 (1993) 447-462
79. Regan D., and Vincent A. Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field. Vision Research 35 (1995) 1845-1857
80. Rosenbaum D.A. Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 (1975) 395-403
81. Runeson S., Juslin P., and Olsson H. Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 525-555
82. Rushton S.K., and Wann J.P. Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 186-190
83. Unpublished manuscript. Schiff W. Accuracy of judging time-to-contact in visual and audiovisual events: Event anisotropy (1988)
84. Schiff W., and Detwiler M.L. Information used in judging impending collision. Perception 8 (1979) 647-656
85. Schiff W., and Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 303-316
86. Sedgwick H.A. Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: Available visual information from texture and perspective. In: Beck J., Hope B., and Rosenfeld A. (Eds). Human and machine vision (1983), Academic Press, NY 425-458
87. Segal S.J., and Fusella V. Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1970) 458-464
88. Shiffrin R.M. Capacity limits in information processing, attention, and memory. In: Estes W.K. (Ed). Handbook of learning and cognitive processes Vol. 4 (1975), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 177-235
89. Simpson W.A. Depth discrimination from optic flow. Perception 17 (1988) 497-512
90. Smith M.R.H., Flach J.M., Dittman S.M., and Stanard T. Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 395-410
91. Smith W.M., and Gulick W.L. Dynamic contour perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (1957) 145-152
92. Stoffregen T.A., and Riccio G.E. Responses to optical looming in the retinal center and periphery. Ecological Psychology 2 (1990) 251-274
93. Todd J.T. Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 795-810
94. Townsend J.T. Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In: Kantowitz B.H. (Ed). Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (1974), Erlbaum, Potomic, MD 133-183
95. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
96. Treisman A.M., and Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 15-48
97. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception 19 (1990) 223-239
98. Tresilian J.R. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 865-876
99. Tresilian J.R. Four questions of time to contact: A critical examination of research on interceptive timing. Perception 22 (1993) 653-680
100. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual and motor processes in interceptive timing. Human Movement Science 13 (1994) 335-373
101. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgement tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 57 (1995) 231-245
102. Tresilian J.R. Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 515-528
103. van der Kamp J., Savelsbergh G., and Smeets J. Multiple information sources in interceptive timing. Human Movement Science 16 (1997) 787-821
104. Wann J.P. Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception 22 (1996) 1034-1048
105. Warren W.H., and Kurtz K.L. The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Perception & Psychophysics 51 (1992) 443-454