Effects of optical flow and discrete warnings on deceleration detection during car following

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1673-1676

  DeLucia, Patricia R ^a   Tharanathan, Anand ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; BRAKES; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; DECELERATION; DISTANCE MEASUREMENT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

BRAKE WARNING SYSTEMS; CAR FOLLOWING; OPTICAL SIZE;

OPTICAL FLOWS;

EID: 44349176038     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120504901737     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. DeLucia, P. R. (2004). Multiple sources of information influence time-to-contact judgments: Do heuristics accommodate limits in sensory and cognitive processes? In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Advances in Psychology 135, Time-to-Contact (pp. 243-286). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
3. DeLucia, P. R., Kaiser, M. K., Bush, J. M., Meyer, L. E., & Sweet, B. T. (2003). Information integration in judgements of time to contact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: 56A,1165-1189.
4. Dingus, T. A., Mcgehee, D. V., Manakkal, N., Jahns, S. K., Carney, C., & Hankey, J. M. (1997). Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices. Human Factors, 39, 216-229.
5. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499-512.
6. Hills, B. L. (1975). Some studies of movement perception, age and accidents. Transport and road research laboratory: Technical report.
7. Hoffmann, E. R. (1968). Detection of vehicle velocity changes in carfollowing. Proceedings of the ARRB, 4, 821-837.
8. Hoffmann, E. R., & Mortimer, R. G. (1994). Drivers' estimates of time to collision. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 511-520.
9. Lee, D. N. (1980). The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B-290, 169-179.
10. th annual meeting.
11. Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303-316.
12. Shinar, D., Rotenberg, E., & Cohen, T. (1997). Crash reduction with an advance brake warning system: a digital simulation. Human Factors 39, 296-302.
13. Smith, M. R. H., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M., & Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 395-410.
14. Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 865-876.
15. Winsum, W. V., & Heino, A. (1996). Choice of time-headway in car following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. Ergonomics 39, 579-592.