A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems

British Dental Journal

Volumn 205, Issue 11, 2008, Pages

  Mehta, S B ^a   Millar, B J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALIBRA; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MEDICAL AUDIT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL AUDIT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; GLASS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; QUARTZ; RESIN CEMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57649183668     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.1023     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Chalifoux P. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Pract Periodontics AesthetDent 1998; 10: 247-254.
2. Rosentie! S, Fujimoto J, Land M. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.
3. Standlee J, Caputo A, Hanson A. Retention of endodontic dowels and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;38:400-405.
4. Stewardson D. Non-metallic post systems. Dent Update 2001;28:326-336.
5. Mentik K, Meuwissen R, Kayser A, Mulder P. Survival rate and failure characteristics for all metal post and core restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20:455-461.
6. Trobjorner A, Karrsan S, Odman P. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:439-441.
7. Weine F, Wax A, Wenckuss C. A retrospective study of tapered smooth post systems in place for 10 years of more. J Endod 1991; 17: 293-297.
8. Tjan A, Way S. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thickness of buccal dentine walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 496-500.
9. Cooney J, Caputo A, Horcomb J, Trabert K. The retentive and stress distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 398-404.
10. Isiclor F, Brounduss K, Rauholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 78-82.
11. Holmes D, Diaz-Arnold A, Leary J. Influence of post dimensions on stress distribution in dentine. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:140-147.
12. Standlee J, Caputo A, Trabert K. Retention and stress distributing properties of threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 398-404.
13. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. [New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Compipost (1)]. ChirDentFr 1990; 60(540): 131-141.
14. Boudrias P, Sakkal S, Petrova Y. Anatomical post design applied to quartz fibre/epoxy technology - a conservative approach. Oral Health 2001; 25:313-319.
15. Fredrikkson M. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-154.
16. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Goody F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast posts and cores. Am J Dent2000; 13(Spec No): 15B-18B.
17. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason P N. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13(Spec No):9B-13B.
18. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fibre epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthet Dent 2003; 16: 39-44.
19. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts, a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 613-618.
20. King P, Setchell D, Rees J. Clinical evalution of carbon fibre reinforced endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 785-789.
21. Manocci F, Ferrari M, Watson T. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fibre posts and composite cores after cyclic loading, a conofocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 284-291.
22. Chritensen G. Posts; necessary or unecessary? J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1522-1524.
23. Trabert K, Caputo A, Abou Rass M. Tooth fracture: a comparison of endodontic and restorative elements. J Endod 1978; 4: 341-345.
24. Portell F, Bernier W, Lorton L, Peters D. The effect of immediate versus delayed dowel space preparation on the integrity of apical seal. J Endod 1982; 8: 154-160.
25. Bateman G, Ricketts D, Saunders W. Fibre based post systems, a review, fir Dent J 2003; 195:43-48.
26. Love R, Purton D. The effect of serrations on carbon fibre posts, retention within the root canal, core retention and post rigidity. Int J Prosthet Dent 1996;9:484-485.
27. Akkyan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:431-437.
28. Maccari P, Conicao E, Nunes M. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth treated with three different prefabricated esthetic posts. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 25-31.
29. Purton D, Payne J. A comparison of carbon fibre and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 93-97.
30. Newman N, Yaman P, Demian J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:360-367.
31. Asmusen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and the strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278.
32. Cormier C, Bunns D, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fibre, ceramic and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 10: 26-36.
33. Mollersten L, Lockwandt P. A comparison of 5 core and post systems. Quintessence Int 2003; 33: 140-149
34. Quintas F. The effect of surface treatment of plain carbon fibre posts on the retention of composite resin cores, an in vitro evaluation. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2001: 15:64-68.
35. Hsu Y B, Nicholls J I, Phillips K M, Libman W J. Effect of core bonding on fatigue failure of compromised teeth. IntJ Prosthodont 2002; 15: 175-178.
36. Ricketts D, Tait C, Higgins A. Tooth preparation for post retained restorations. Br Dent J 2005; 198:431-471.
37. De Rijk W. Removal of fibre posts from endodontically treated teeth. ArnJ Dent 2000; 13: 19B-21B.
38. Schwartz R, Robbins J. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth. A literature review. J Endod2004; 30: 289-300.
39. Terry D A, Triolo P T Jr, Swift E J Jr. Fabrication of direct fiber-reinforced posts: a structural design concept. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13: 228-240.