A comparison of strengths of five core and post-and-core systems

Quintessence International

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 140-149

  Möllersten, Lennart ^a,b   Lockowandt, Paul ^a   Lindén, Lars Åke ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b Karolinska Institute ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Core; Failure mode; Post; Post and core; Strength; System

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON FIBER; GLASS IONOMER; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CARBON; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PINS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0036481081     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Rosenstiel S, Land M, Fujimoto J. Mouth preparation. In: Sokolowski DS (ed). Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, ed 1. St Louis: Mosby, 1988:96-111.
2. McLean JW, Gasser O. Glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int 1985;16:333-343.
3. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-15.
4. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Ödman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
5. Engelman MJ. Core materials. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988; 16(11):41-45.
6. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:584-590.
7. Tjan AHL, Grant BE, Dunn JR. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:24-29.
8. Eli I, Deutsch-Zelevitch E, Gelerenter I, Liberman R. Effect of parapulpal pins on conservative restoration of pulpless premolars. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:577-581.
9. Viguie G, Malquarti G, Vincent B, Bourgeois D. Epoxy/ carbon composite resins in dentistry: Mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72: 245-249.
10. Eshelman EG, Sayegh FS. Dowel materials and root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:342-344.
11. Kern SB, von Frauenhoffer JA, Mueninghoff LA. An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:509-514.
12. Plasmans PJJM, Visseren LGH, Vrijhoef MMA, Käyser AF. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1986;12:382-387.
13. Volwiler R, Nicholls J, Harrington G. A comparison of three core buildup materials used in conjunctions with two post systems in endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Endod 1989;15:355-361.
14. McDonald AV, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990;23:304-312.
15. Cohen BI, Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:178-182.
16. Isidor F, Ödman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:131-136.
17. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:458-464.
18. Dietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:498-507.
19. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutch AS, Musicant BL. Fracture strength of three core restorative materials supported with and without a prefabricated split shank-post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:560-565.
20. Cobb G. Introduction to design and analysis of experiments. New York: Springer, 1997.