Evidence-based strategies that help office-based teachers give effective feedback

Family Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 617-619

  Dobbie, Alison ^a   Tysinger, James W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENDER; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; RESIDENT; SHORT SURVEY;

COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PRECEPTORSHIP; SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 26644458601     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Jackson JL, O'Malley PG, Salerno SM. Kroenke K. The teacher and learner interactive assessment system (TeLIAS): a new tool to assess teaching behaviors in the ambulatory setting. Teach Learn Med 2002;14(4):249-56.
2. Salerno SM, O'Malley PG, Pangaro LN, Wheeler GA, Moores LK, Jackson JL. Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:799-87.
3. Kernan WN, Holmboe E, O'Connor PG. Assessing the teaching behaviors of ambulatory care preceptors. Acad Med 2004;79:1088-94.
4. Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Eliassen S, Pipas C, Donahue D. Differences in ambulatory teaching and learning by gender match of preceptors and students. Fam Med 2000; 32(9):618-23.
5. Quirk M, Stone S, Chuman A, et al. Using differences between perceptions of importance and competence to identify teaching needs of primary care preceptors. Teach Learn Med 2002;14(3):157-63.
6. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250(8):777-81.
7. Ende J, Pomerantz A, Erickson F. Preceptors' strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting: a qualitative analysis. Acad Med 1995;70(3):224-9.
8. Schultz KW, Kirby J, Delva D, et al. Medical students' and residents' preferred site characteristics and preceptor behaviours for learning in the ambulatory setting: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Medical Education 2004;4:12. www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/4/12. Accessed May 19, 2005.
9. Torre DM, Sebastian JL, Simpson DE. Learning activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third-year IM clerkship students. Acad Med 2003;78:812-4.
10. Sostok MA, Coberly L, Rouan G. Feedback process between faculty and students. Acad Med 2002;77(3):267.
11. O'Hara BS, Maple SA, Bogdewic SP, Saywell RM, Zollinger TW, Smith CP. Gender and preceptors' feedback to students. Acad Med 2000;75(10):1030.
12. Schum TR, Krippendorf RL, Biernat KA. Simple feedback notes enhance specificity of feedback to learners. Amb Pediatr 2003;3(1): 9-11.
13. Paukert JL, Richards ML, Olney C. An encounter card system for increasing feedback to students. Am J Surg 2002;183(3):300-4.
14. Greenberg LW, Medical students' perceptions of feedback in a busy ambulatory setting: a descriptive study using a clinical encounter card. South Med J 2004;97(12):1174-8.
15. Levy PE, Albright MD, Cawley BD, Williams JR. Situational and individual determinant of feedback seeking: a closer look at the process. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1995;62(1):23-37.
16. Steelman LA, Levy PE, Snell AF. The Feedback Environment Scale: construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2004;64(1):165-84.
17. Colletti LM. Difficulty with negative feedback: face-to-face evaluation of junior medical student clinical performance results in grade inflation. J Surg Res 2000;90(1):82-7.