The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 114-146

  Mahoney, James ^a   Kimball, Erin ^a   Koivu, Kendra L ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causality; Explanation; Logic; Sequence analysis; Set theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349091206     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414008325433     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Adams, J., Clemens, E. S., & Orloff, A. S. (Eds.). (2005). Remaking modernity: Politics, history, and sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2007). Case study methods in the international relations subfield. Comparative Political Studies, 40 (2). 170-195.
4. Brady, H. (2008). Causation and explanation in social science. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 217-270). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6. Braumoeller, B.F. (2003). Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis, 11 (3). 209-233.
7. Braumoeller, B.F., & Goertz, G. (2000). The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44 (4). 844-858.
8. Brooks, S.G., & Wohlforth, W.C. (2000-2001). Power, globalization, and the end of the cold war: Reevaluating a landmark case for ideas. International Security, 25 (3). 5-53.
9. Brooks, S.G., & Wohlforth, W.C. (2002). From old thinking to new thinking in qualitative research. International Security, 26 (4). 93-111.
10. Clark, W.R., Gilligan, M.J., & Golder, M. (2006). A simple multivariate test for asymmetric hypotheses. Political Analysis, 14 (3). 311-331.
11. Deyo, F. (Ed.). (1987). The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12. Dion, D. (1998). Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. Comparative Politics, 30 (2). 127-145.
13. Downing, B.M. (1992). The military revolution and political change: Origins of democracy and autocracy in early modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Downs, G. (1989). The rational deterrence debate. World Politics, 41 (2). 225-237.
15. Eliason, S., & Stryker, R. (in press). Goodness-of-fit tests and descriptive measures in fuzzy-set analysis. Sociological Methods and Research.
16. Elman, C. (2005). Explanatory typologies in qualitative studies of international politics. International Organization, 59 (2). 293-326.
17. English, R. (2002). Power, ideas, and new evidence on the cold war's end: A reply to Brooks and Wohlforth. International Security, 26 (4). 70-92.
18. Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and sandcastles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19. Gerring, J. (2005). Causation: A unified framework for the social sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17, 163-198.
20. Gerring, J. (2007). The mechanistic worldview: Thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science, 38 (1). 161-179.
21. George, A.L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Goertz, G. (2003 a). The substantive importance of necessary condition hypotheses. In G. Goertz & H. Starr (Eds.), Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 65-94). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
23. Goertz, G. (2003 b). Cause, correlation, and necessary conditions. In G. Goertz & H. Starr (Eds.), Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 47-64). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24. Goertz, G. (2006). Assessing the trivialness, relevance, and relative importance of necessary or sufficient conditions in social science. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41 (2). 88-109.
25. Goertz, G., & Levy, J. (Eds.). (2007). Explaining war and peace: Case studies and necessary condition counterfactuals. London: Routledge.
26. Goertz, G., & Starr, H. (Eds.). (2003). Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
27. Goldhagen, D.J. (1996). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the holocaust. New York: Knopf.
28. Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in newly industrializing countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29. Honorí, T., and Hart, H.L.A. (1985). Causation in the law (2 nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Kendall, P. L. (Ed.). (1982). The varied sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Lebow, R.N. (2000). Contingency, catalysts, and international system change. Political Science Quarterly, 115 (4). 591-616.
32. Levy, J.S. (1990). Preferences, constraints, and choices in July 1914. International Security, 15 (3). 151-186.
33. Luebbert, G.M. (1991). Liberalism, fascism, or social democracy: Social classes and the political origins of regimes in interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Mackie, J.L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 245-264.
35. Mackie, J.L. (1980). Cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
36. Mahoney, J. (1999). Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104 (4). 1154-1196.
37. Mahoney, J. (2001). The legacies of liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in Central America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Mahoney, J. (2008). Toward a unified theory of causality. Comparative Political Studies, 41 (4 / 5). 412-436.
39. Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14 (3). 227-249.
40. Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Mahoney, J., & Terrie, P.L. (2008). Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 737-755). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Moore, B., Jr. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon.
43. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Pierson, P. (2007). The costs of marginalization: Qualitative methods in the study of American politics. Comparative Political Studies, 40 (2). 146-169.
45. Potter, M. (2004). Set theory and its philosophy: A critical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46. Ragin, C.C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47. Ragin, C.C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Ragin, C.C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14 (3). 291-310.
49. Roberts, C. (1996). The logic of historical explanation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
50. Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-cold war world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
52. Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Waldner, D. (1999). State building and late development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
54. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. Yashar, D.J. (1997). Demanding democracy: Reform and reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, 1870s-1950s. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.