Focus-on-form instructional methods promote deaf college students' improvement in English grammar

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 8-24

  Berent, Gerald P ^a   Kelly, Ronald R ^a   Aldersley, Stephen ^a   Schmitz, Kathryn L ^a   Khalsa, Baldev Kaur ^a   Panara, John ^a   Keenan, Susan ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; STUDENT; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; DEAFNESS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; STUDENTS; TEACHING; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 33845453201     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Albertini, J., Bochner, J., Cuneo, C., Hunt, L., Nielson, R., Seago, L., & Shannon, N. (1986). Development of a writing test for deaf college students. Teaching English to Deaf and Second-Language Students, 4(2), 5-11.
2. Berent, G. P. (1988). An assessment of syntactic capabilities. In M. Strong (Ed.), Language learning and deafness (pp. 133-161). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3. Berent, G. P. (1993). Improvements in the English syntax of deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 55-61.
4. Berent, G. P. (1996). The acquisition of English syntax by deaf learners. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 469-506). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Berent, G. P. (2005a). Coding deaf and hard-of-hearing students' successful and unsuccessful English productions. In D. Janáková (Ed.), Proceedings 2004: Teaching English to deaf and hard-of-hearing students at secondary and tertiary levels of education in the Czech Republic (pp. 109-115). Prague, Czech Republic: Eurolex Bohemia.
6. Berent, G. P. (2005b). Input enhancement in teaching English to deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In D. Janáková (Ed.), Proceedings 2004: Teaching English to deaf and hard-of-hearing students at secondary and tertiary levels of education in the Czech Republic (pp. 75-87). Prague, Czech Republic: Eurolex Bohemia.
7. Berent, G. P., Aldersley, S., Kelly, R. R., Schmitz, K. L., Khalsa, B. K., Panara, J., & Keenan, S. (2005, June). Focus-on-form teaching methods promote deaf college students' improvement of English grammar skills. Paper presented at the Fourth Meeting of the English Think Tank: Literacy in the English Classroom and Beyond, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester, NY.
8. Berent, G. P., Samar, V. J., Kelly, R., Berent, R., Bochner, J., Albertini, J., & Sacken, J. (1996). Validity of indirect assessment of writing competency for deaf and hard-of-hearing college students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 167-178.
9. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman, Inc.
10. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
11. Cowan, R., & Hatasa, Y. A. (1994). Investigating the validity and reliability of native speaker and second-language learner judgments about sentences. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 287-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Crandall, K. A. (1997). Review and selection of tests for placement of deaf college students in NTID's nonfiction reading curriculum: A Curriculum Development Team report. Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf at the Rochester Institute of Technology.
13. Cuculick, J. A., & Kelly, R. R. (2003). Relating deaf students' reading and language scores at college entry to their degree completion rates. American Annals of the Deaf, 148, 279-286.
14. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
15. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223-236.
17. Gass, S. M. (1994). The reliability of second-language grammaticality judgments. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 303-322). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Han, Z.-H. (2005, February). Input enhancement: Untangling the tangles. Keynote presentation at the 27th Winter Applied Linguistics Conference, New York State Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, New York.
20. Han, Z.-H., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2005). Input enhancement: A critical meta-synthesis of the research. Unpublished manuscript, Teachers College, Columbia University.
21. Hollywood and Broadway, (n.d.). Retrieved September 1, 2004, from http:// www.geocities.com/yamataro670/hollywood-broadway.htm
22. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
23. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-216). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
24. Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217-258). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
25. Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
26. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, C. Kramsch, & R. Ginsberg (Eds. , Foreign language research in a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency. (1977). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, English Language Institute.
28. Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
29. Quigley, S. P., & King, C. M. (1980). Syntactic performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 329-356.
30. Schley, S., & Albertini, J. A. (2005). Assessing the writing of deaf college students: Re-evaluating a direct assessment of writing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 96-105.
31. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
32. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
33. Sharwood Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.
34. Shook, D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake hypothesis. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
35. Shook, D. (1999). What foreign language reading recalls reveal about the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 10, 39-76.
36. Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1980). Statistical methods (7th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
37. Tiegs, E. W., & Clark, W. W. (1957). California Achievement Tests - Junior high level. Monterey, CA: California Test Bureau.
38. Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337-348.
39. Wilbur, R. B., Goodhart, W. C., & Montandon, E. (1983). Comprehension of nine syntactic structures by hearing-impaired students. The Volta Review, 85, 328-345.
40. Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 671-691). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.