School reform policy in England since 1988: Relentless pursuit of the unattainable

Journal of Education Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 669-683

  Barker, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accountability; Choice and markets; National curriculum and testing; New public management; School reform; Social justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 56549111410     PISSN: 02680939     EISSN: 14645106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02680930802212887     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adonis, A. 2005. Better schools, better results: Why our teenagers are making the grade. Speech at Christ Church University College, August 17. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/speeches/media/documents/alevels.doc (accessed July 9, 2007).
2. Anheier, H. 2000. Managing non-profit organizations: Towards a new approach. Civil Society Working Paper 1. https://lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS/pdf/ cswpl.pdf (accessed July 31, 2007).
3. Apple, M. 1989. Critical introduction: Ideology and the state in educational policy. In The state and education policy, ed. R. Dale, 1-14. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
4. Ball, S. 1999. Labour, learning and the economy: A 'policy sociology' perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education 29, no. 2: 195-206.
5. -. 2003. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18, no. 2: 215-28.
6. Barker, B. 1988. The dangers inherent in Baker's Bill. The Independent, April 14.
7. -. 2005. Transforming schools: Illusion or reality. Stoke: Trentham Books.
8. -. 2007. The leadership paradox: Can school leaders transform student outcomes'? School Effectiveness and School Improvement 18, no. 1: 21-4.
9. BBC. 2003. GCSE results fall in vocational boom. BBC News Education. http://news.bbc.co.uk/l/ low/education/3176042.stm (accessed July 9, 2007).
10. Bell, L., R. Bolam, and L. Cubillo. 2003. A systematic review of the impact of school headteachers and principals on student outcomes. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
11. Bernstein, B. 1970. Education cannot compensate for society. New Society 389: 344-7.
12. Blair, T. 2001. Our schools can only get better if they are distinct. The Times, February 14, p. 22.
13. Blumenthal, D. 2001. Controlling health care expenditures. New England Journal of Medicine 344, no. 10: 766-9.
14. Boyle, D. 2001. You can count me out. The Observer, January 14, p. 1, Features and Reviews
15. Bridges, D., and T. McLaughlin, eds. 1994. Education and the market place. London: Falmer Press.
16. Brown, P., A. Green, and H. Lauder. 2001. High skills: Globalization, competitiveness and skill formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Burch, M., and I. Holliday. 2000. New Labour and the machinery of government. In New Labour in power, ed. D. Coates and P. Lawler, 65-79. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18. Caldwell, B. 2001. Leadership and innovation in the transformation of schools. Nottingham: NCSL. http://www.ncsl.org.uk/media/1CB/30/leadership-and- innovation-in-the-transformation-of-schools.pdf (accessed July 31, 2007).
19. Chitty, C. 1989. Towards a new education system: The victory of the new right? London: Falmer Press.
20. Chitty, C., and J. Dunford, eds. 1999. State schools: New Labour and the Conservative legacy. London: Woburn Press.
21. Clare, J. 2006. Half of 5-year-olds failing to reach education targets. Telegraph.co.uk. http:// www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510693/Half-of- 5-year-olds-failing-to-reach-education-targets.html (accessed 29 September 2008).
22. Clarke, J., and J. Newman. 1997. The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.
23. Coppieters, P. 2005. Turning schools into learning organizations. European Journal of Teacher Education 28, no. 2: 129-39.
24. Cutler, T., and B. Waine. 2000. Managerial ism reformed? New Labour and public sector management. Social Policy & Administration 34, no. 3: 318-32.
25. Davies, N. 2000. The school report. London: Vintage.
26. Day, C., A. Harris, M. Hadfield, H. Tolley, and J. Beresford. 2000. Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27. Deale, R. 1975. Assessment and testing in the secondary school. London: Methuen.
28. Deem, R., S. Hillyard, and M. Reed. 2007. Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Deer, C. 2004. The expansion of higher education: Economic necessity or hyper-inflation? In Balancing the skills equation: Key policy issues and challenges for policy and practice, ed. G. Hayward and S. James, 203-18. Bristol: Policy Press.
30. DfCSF. 2007. What are academies? London: Author. http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/academies/ what_are_academies/?version=T (accessed July 9, 2007).
31. DfES. 2001. Patterns of educational attainment in the British coalfields. Research Report No. 314. London: HMSO.
32. -. 2002. Government response to the report of the Council for Excellence in Management and Leadership. Nottingham: Author.
33. -. 2003a. Raising attainment in schools in former coalfield areas. Research Report No. 423. Nottingham: Author.
34. -. 2003b. Widening participation in higher education, DfES 0301/2003. London: Author.
35. -. 2005. Higher standards, better schools for all: More choice for parents and pupils (Cm 6677). London: Stationery Office.
36. -. 2006a. Trends in education and skills. London: Author. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/trends/ index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showIndicator&cid= 5&iid=32 (accessed July 9, 2007).
37. -. 2006b. Programme of research, 2003080. Research into the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Tendered, Expected start date 2.01.06. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/ programmeofresearch/index.cfm?type=0 (accessed January 28, 2007).
38. Dunford, J. 2007. New dawn or total eclipse. Leader 23: 14-5.
39. English, E., L. Hargreaves, and J. Hislam. 2002. Pedagogical dilemmas in the national literacy strategy: Primary teachers' perceptions, reflections and classroom behaviour. Cambridge Journal of Education 32, no. 1: 9-26.
40. Feinstein, L., and J. Symons. 1997. Discussion paper no. 341: Attainment in secondary school. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
41. Fielding, M. 2006. Leadership, personalization and high performance schooling: Naming the new totalitarianism. School Leadership & Management 26, no. 4: 347-69.
42. Fitz, J., J. Lee, and R. Eke. 2000. Inspection, regulation and governance: The role of school inspection under Labour. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, September 7-9, in Cardiff, UK.
43. Frean, A. 2007. Rich pull away from poor in the classroom. The Times, December 31. http:// www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/ education/article3111427.ece (accessed February 24, 2008).
44. Fullan, M. 2003. The moral imperative of school leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
45. Galbraith, J. 1999. Free market fraud. The Progressive Magazine, January. http://www.third-worldtraveler.com/Economics/FreeMarketFraudGalbraith. html (accessed July 28, 2007).
46. Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
47. Gold, A., J. Evans, P. Earley, D. Halpin, and P. Collarbone. 2003. Principled principals? Values-driven leadership: Evidence from ten case studies of 'outstanding' school leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 31, no. 2: 127-37.
48. Goldstein, H. 2001. Using pupil performance data forjudging schools and teachers: Scope and limitations. British Educational Research Journal 27, no. 4: 433-43.
49. Goldstein, H., and D. Spiegelhalter. 1996. League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 159, no. 3: 355-443.
50. Goldstein, H., and S. Thomas. 1996. Using examination results as indicators of school and college performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 159, no. 1: 149-63.
51. Grace, G. 1998. Realizing the mission: Catholic approaches to school effectiveness. In School effectiveness to whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movement, ed. R. Slee and G. Weiner (with S. Tomlinson), 117-27. London: Falmer Press.
52. Gray, J., H. Goldstein, and S. Thomas. 2001. Predicting the future: The role of past performance in determining trends in institutional effectiveness at A level. British Educational Research Journal 27, no. 4: 391-405.
53. Gray, J., D. Hopkins, D. Reynolds, B. Wilcox, S. Farrell, and D. Jesson. 1999. Improving schools: Performance and potential. Buckingham: Open University Press.
54. Gray, J., D. Tesson, and N. Sime. 1990. Estimating differences in the examination performances of secondary schools in six LEAS: A multi-level approach to school effectiveness. Oxford Review of Education, 16, no. 2: 137-58.
55. Gunter, H. 2001. Critical approaches to leadership in education. Journal of Educational Enquiry 2, no. 2: 94-108.
56. Hallinger, P. 2003. Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education 33, no. 3: 329-51.
57. Hallinger, P., and R. Heck. 1998. Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 9, no. 2: 157-91.
58. Hannaway, J., and A. Rotherham, eds. 2006. Collective bargaining in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
59. Hargreaves, A. 2003. Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.
60. Hargreaves, A., and D. Fink. 2006. Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. Harris, A. 2004. Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 32, no. 1: 11-22.
62. Hopkins, D. 2007. Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
63. Hoyle, E., and M. Wallace. 2007. Educational reform: An ironic perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 35, no. 1: 9-25.
64. Husbands, C. 2001. Managing 'performance' in the performing school. In The performing school, ed. D. Gleeson and C. Husbands, 7-19. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
65. Iacovou, M. 2001. Class size in the early years: Is small really better? Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, Essex University.
66. Jeffrey, B., and P. Woods. 1998. Testing teachers: The effect of school inspections on primary teachers. London: Falmer Press.
67. Judkins, M., and P. Rudd. 2005. Evaluation of high-performing specialist schools. Slough: NFER. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, 15-17 September, in Pontypridd.
68. Lawson, N. 1993. The New from no. 11: Memoirs of a Tory radical. London: Corgi.
69. Levačič, R., and P. Woods. 2002a. Raising school performance in the league tables (part 1): Disentangling the effects of social disadvantage. British Educational Research Journal 28, no. 2: 207-26.
70. -. 2002b. Raising school performance in the league tables (part 2): Barriers to responsiveness in three disadvantaged schools. British Educational Research Journal 28, no. 2: 227-47.
71. Lowe, R. 1997. Schooling and Social Change 1964.....1990. London: Routledge.
72. Lupton, R. 2004. Understanding local contexts for schooling and their implications for school processes and quality. BERA Research Intelligence 89, November.
73. Luyten, H., A. Visscher, and B. Witziers. 2005. School effectiveness research: From a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16, no. 3: 249-79.
74. Mabey, C., and M. Ramirez. 2004. Developing managers: A European perspective. London: Chartered Management Institute. http://www.managers. org.uk/euromanagementdevelopment (accessed April 14, 2006).
75. Mansell, W. 2007. Education by numbers: The tyranny of testing. London: Politico's Publishing.
76. McNeil, L. 2000. Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardised testing. New York: Routledge.
77. McNess, E., P. Broadfoot, and M. Osborn. 2003. Is the effective compromising the affective? British Educational Research Journal 29, no. 2: 243-57.
78. Miliband, D. 2002. Speech (Annual meeting of the Association for Foundation and Voluntary Aided Schools). London: DIES.
79. Muijs, D., J. Campbell, L. Kyriakidis, and W. Robinson. 2005. Making the case for differentiated teacher effectiveness: An overview of research in four key areas. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16, no. 1: 51-70.
80. Nader, R. 1965. Unsafe at any speed. New York: Grossman.
81. Naylor, R. 2007. Whose degree is it anyway? Why, how and where universities are failing our students. Rake, Hants: Pencil-Sharp.
82. NCSL. 2003a. Co-coaching guide. RL/CC/01. Nottingham: Author.
83. -. 2003b. Leadership programme for serving headteachers: Facilitator guide. Nottingham: Author.
84. Newman, J. 2001. Modernizing governance: New Labour, policy and society. London: Sage.
85. New Statesman. 2002. Who cares if standards are falling. August 26. http://www.newstatesman. com/200208260001 (accessed My 9, 2007).
86. NUT. 2004. Education is for children, not profit: Update on privatisation and commercialisation issues. http://www.teachers.org.uk/story.php?id=3085. (accessed July 28, 2007).
87. Ofsted. 2005. Every child matters: Framework for the inspection of schools in England from September 2005. Version 1, 2005, HMI 2345. London: Author.
88. Passeron, J. 1990. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
89. Peters, T., and R. Waterman. 1995. In search of excellence. London: Harper and Row.
90. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2007. Research report: The economic benefits of a degree. London: Universities UK.
91. Radford, M. 2006. Researching classrooms: Complexity and chaos. British Educational Research Journal 32, no. 2: 177-90.
92. Sainsbury, M., and S. Sizmur. 1998. Level descriptions in the National Curriculum: What kind of criterion referencing is this? Oxford Review of Education 24, no. 2: 181-93.
93. Scheerens, J. 1989. Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.
94. Shah, S., B. Barker, and C. Dimmock. 2007. Muslim students in the UK: Identity, inclusion and achievement. Unpublished paper available from the authors at the School of Education, University of Leicester.
95. Simon, B. 1988. Bending the rules. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
96. -. 1991. Education and the social order 1940-1990. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
97. Smithers, A. 2007. Blair's education: An international perspective. Buckingham: Centre for Education and Employment Research, University of Buckingham.
98. Stahl, S. 1999. Different strokes for different folks? A critique of learning styles. American Educator 23, no. 3: 27-31.
99. Thrupp, M. 2001. Recent school effectiveness counter-critiques: Problems and possibilities. British Educational Research Journal 27, no. 4: 443-57.
100. Tosey, P. 2005. The hunting of the learning organization: A paradoxical journey. Management Learning 36, no. 3: 335-52.
101. Trân Kiêu. 2002. Education in Vietnam: Current state and issues. Hanoi: Thê Giói.
102. Twelftree, M. 2007. The perfect supplement. Leader 21: 25-6.
103. Universities UK. 2007. Policy briefing - Spending review 2007: Securing the future. London: Author.
104. West, A., and Pennell, H. 2000. Publishing school examination results in England: Incentives and consequences. Educational Studies 26, no. 4: 423-36.
105. West, S. 1991. Values and the arts. All-in Success: Journal of the Centre for the Study of Comprehensive Schools 3, no. 5: 26.
106. Wilkinson, R. 2000. New Labour and the global economy. In New Labour in power, ed. D. Coates and P. Lawler, 136-48. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
107. Wyse, D. 2003. The national literacy strategy: A critical review of empirical evidence. British Educational Research Journal 29, no. 6: 903-16.
108. Xiao, J. 1998. Education expansion in Shenzhen, China: Its interface with economic development. International Journal of Educational Development 18, no. 1: 3-19.