Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy

Phonetica

Volumn 62, Issue 2-4, 2005, Pages 146-159

  Pluymaekers, Mark ^a   Ernestus, Mirjam ^a,b   Baayen, R Harald ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TIME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ARTICULATION TESTS; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 29744443991     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000090095     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aylett, M.; Turk, A.: The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodie prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Lang. Speech 47: 31-56 (2004).
2. Bard, E.; Anderson, A.; Sotillo, C.; Aylett, M.; Doherty-Sneddon, G.; Newlands, A.: Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. J. Mem. Lang. 42: 1-22 (2000).
3. Bell, A.; Jurafsky, D.; Fosler-Lussier, E.; Girand, C.; Gregory, M.; Gildea, D.: Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 113: 1001-1024 (2003).
4. Boersma, P.: Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 5: 341-355 (2001).
5. Bush, N.: Frequency effects and word-boundary palatalization in English; in Bybee, Hopper, Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, pp. 255-280 (Benjamins, Amsterdam 2001).
6. Bybee, J.L.: Phonology and language use (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001).
7. Chatterjee, S.; Hadi, A.; Price, B.: Regression analysis by example (Wiley, New York 2000).
8. Cholin, J.: Syllables in speech production: effects of syllable preparation and syllable frequency: PhD thesis Nijmegen (2004).
9. Ernestus, M.: Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: a corpus-based study of the phonologyphonetics interface (LOT, Utrecht 2000).
10. Fosler-Lussier, E.; Morgan, N.: Effects of speaking rate and word frequency on pronunciations in conversational speech. Speech Commun. 29: 137-158 (1999).
11. Fowler, C: Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Lang. Speech 31: 307-317 (1988).
12. Fowler, C.; Housum, J.: Talkers' signalling of 'new' and 'old' words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. J. Mem. Lang. 26: 489-504 (1987).
13. Fowler, C. ; Levy, E. ; Brown, J. : Reductions of spoken words in certain discourse contexts. J. Mem. Lang. 37: 24-40 (1997).
14. Gahl, S.; Garnsey, S.: Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80: 748-774 (2004).
15. Gregory, M.; Raymond, W.; Bell, A.; Fosler-Lussier, E.; Jurafsky, D.: The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Ling. Soc. 35: 151-166 (1999).
16. Hawkins, S.; Warren, P.: Phonetic influences on the intelligibility of conversational speech. J. Phonet. 22: 493-511 (1994).
17. Hunnicutt, S.: Intelligibility versus redundancy - conditions of dependency. Lang. Speech 28: 47-56 (1985).
18. Johnson, K.: Massive reduction in conversational American English. Spontaneous speech: data and analysis. Proc. 1st Session 10th Int. Symp., Tokyo 2004.
19. Jurafsky, D.; Bell, A.; Gregory, M.; Raymond, W.: Probabilistic relations between words: evidence from reduction in lexical production; in Bybee, Hopper, Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, pp. 229-254 (Benjamins, Amsterdam 2001).
20. Keune, K.; Ernestus, M.; Van Hout, R.; Baayen, R.H.: Social, geographical, and register variation in Dutch: from written 'mogelijk' to spoken 'mok'. Corpus Linguist. linguist. Theory (in press).
21. Kohler, K. : Investigating unscripted speech: implications for phonetics and phonology. Phonetica 57: 85-94 (2000).
22. Levelt, W.J.M.; Wheeldon, L.: Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition 50: 239-269 (1994).
23. Lieberman, P. : Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Lang. Speech6: 172-187 (1963).
24. Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchai, Speech production and speech modeling, pp. 403-440 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990).
25. Manning, C.; Schuätze, H.: Foundations of statistical natural language processing (MIT Press, Cambridge 1999).
26. Oostdijk, N.: The Spoken Dutch Corpus project. ELRA Newsl. 5: 4-8 (2000).
27. Pickering, M.; Garrod, S.: Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sei. 27: 169-226 (2004).
28. Pluymaekers, M.; Ernestus, M.; Baayen, R.H.: Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 110: 2561-2569 (2005).
29. Runenstein, H.; Pollack, I: Word predictability and intelligibility. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 2: 147-158 (1963).
30. Vorstermans, A.; Martens, J.; Van Coile, B.: Automatic segmentation and labelling of multi-lingual speech data. Speech Commun. 19: 271-293 (1996).