A Comparison between Panoramic Digital and Digitized Images to Detect Simulated Periapical Lesions Using Radiographic Subtraction

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1500-1503

  Miguens Jr , Sergio Augusto Quevedo ^a   Veeck, Elaine Bauer ^a   Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo ^b   da Costa, Nilza Pereira ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Panoramic radiography; periapical lesion; subtraction technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICS; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 56249132615     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bender I.B., and Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesion in bone: I. J Am Dent Assoc 62 (1961) 152-160
2. Bender I.B., and Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesion in bone: II. J Am Dent Assoc 62 (1961) 708-716
3. Barbat J., and Messer H.H. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. J Endod 24 (1998) 837-842
4. Low K.M., Dula K., Bürgin W., and von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 34 (2008) 557-562
5. Nair M.K., and Nair U.P. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. J Endod 33 (2007) 1-6
6. Jeffcoat M.K., Reddy M.S., Webber R.L., Williams R.C., and Ruttimann U.E. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 22 (1987) 396-402
7. Reddy M.S., and Jeffcoat M.K. Digital subtraction radiography. Dent Clin North Am 37 (1993) 553-565
8. Lehmann T.M., Gröndahl H.G., and Benn D.K. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29 (2000) 323-346
9. Yoshioka T., Kobayashi C., Suda H., and Sasaki T. An observation of the healing process of periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography. J Endod 28 (2002) 589-591
10. Gegler A., Mahl C., and Fontanella V.C. Reproducibility of and file format effects on digital subtraction radiography of simulated external root resorptions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 10-13
11. Wakoh M., Nishikawa K., Otonari T., et al. Digital subtraction technique for evaluation of peri-implant bone change in digital imaging. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 47 (2006) 57-64
12. Carvalho F.B., Gonçalves M., and Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of chronic periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography by using Adobe Photoshop CS: a technical report. J Endod 33 (2007) 493-497
13. Nicopoulou-Karayianni K., Brägger U., Bürgin W., Nielsen P.M., and Lang N.P. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72 (1991) 251-256
14. Parsell D.E., Gatewood R.S., Watts J.D., and Streckfus C.F. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86 (1998) 498-502
15. Cunha F.S., da Silva A.E., Larentis N., and Fontanella V. Diagnostic performance of periapical radiographs in digitized simulated bone loss in apical region. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Passo Fundo 10 (2005) 88-93
16. Masood F., Katz J.O., Hardman P.K., Glaros A.G., and Spencer P. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93 (2002) 626-631
17. Braga C.P.A., Gegler A., and Fontanella V. Evaluation of the influence of the thickness and of the relative position of soft tissues simulating materials in the optic density of periapical radiographies of the posterior region of the mandible. Cienc Odontol Bras 9 (2006) 52-58
18. Meier A.W., Brown C.E., Miles D.A., and Analoui M. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 22 (1996) 516-520
19. Koenig L., Parks E., Analoui M., and Eckert G. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 (2004) 37-43
20. Tirrell B.C., Miles D.A., Brown Jr. C.E., and Legan J.J. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 22 (1996) 74-78
21. Dove S.B., McDavid W.D., and Hamilton K.E. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 (2000) 771-776
22. Almeida S.M., Bóscolo F.N., Haiter Neto F., and Santos J.C.B. Evaluation of three radiographic methods (conventional periapical, digital periapical and panoramic) in the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions. Pesqui Odontol Bras 15 (2001) 56-63
23. Folk R.B., Thorpe J.R., McClanahan S.B., Johnson J.D., and Strother J.M. Comparison of two different direct digital radiography systems for the ability to detect artificially prepared periapical lesions. J Endod 31 (2005) 304-306
24. Southard K.A., and Southard T.E. Detection of simulated osteoporosis in human anterior maxillary alveolar bone with digital subtraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78 (1994) 655-661
25. Bittar-Cortez J.A., Passeri L.A., de Almeida S.M., and Haiter-Neto F. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 258-262
26. Pecoraro M., Azadivatan-le N., Janal M., and Khocht A. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34 (2005) 279-284
27. Wu D.M., Wu Y.N., Guo W., and Sameer S. Accuracy of direct digital radiography in the study of the root canal type. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 263-265
28. Ekberg E.C., Petersson A., and Nilner M. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 (1998) 230-235
29. Tyndall D.A., Kapa S.F., and Bagnell C.P. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region. J Endod 16 (1990) 173-178
30. Stassinakis A., Brägger U., Stojanovic M., Bürgin W., Lussi A., and Lang N.P. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 24 (1995) 232-237