Comparison of two different direct digital radiography systems for the ability to detect artificially prepared periapical lesions

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 304-306

  Folk, Robert B ^c   Thorpe, Jeffery R ^c   McClanahan, Scott B ^a,c   Johnson, James D ^b   Strother, James M ^c  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MANDIBLE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE;

EID: 17144415271     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000140571.23012.ff     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bender I, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I & II. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:152-60, 708-16.
2. Schwartz SF, Foster JK Jr. Roentgenographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions: Part I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:606-12.
3. Ramadan AE, Mitchell DF. A roentgenographic study of experimental bone destruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962;15:934-43.
4. Shoha RR, Dowson J, Richards AG. Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:294-303.
5. LeQuire AK, Cunningham CJ, Pelleu GB Jr. Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced osseous lesions of the human mandible. J Endod 1977;3:274-6.
6. Lee S, Messer H. Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone. Int Endod J 1986;19:64-72.
7. Brynolf I. Roentgenologic periapical diagnosis: IV. When is one roentgenogram not sufficient? Sven Tandlak Tidskr 1970;63:415-23.
8. Farman AG, Farman TT. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film. Int J Comput Dent 1999;2:183-96.
9. Farman AG, Farman TT. Image resolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:619-21.
10. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:585-9.
11. Barbat J, Messer HH. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. J Endod 1998;24:837-42.