The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 37-43

  Koenig, L ^a   Parks, E ^b   Analoui, M ^c   Eckert, G ^d  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c PFIZER INC   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Image compression; Radiography, dental, digital

Indexed keywords

OXIDIZING AGENT; PERCHLORIC ACID;

ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH SOCKET;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CADAVER; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OXIDANTS; PERCHLORIC ACID; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 4143058983     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/30099843     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kang KS, Park HW. Lossless medical image compression by multilevel decomposition. J Digit Imaging 1996; 9: 11-20.
2. Wondrow MA, Wegwerth PJ, Mitchell MP, Gilbert PK. A study of medical image data compression. SMPTE Journal 1993; 1: 9-13.
3. Cosman PC, Gray RM, Olshen RA. Evaluating quality of compressed medical images: SNR, subjective rating, and diagnostic accuracy. Proc IEEE 1994; 82: 919-932.
4. Kido S, Ikezoe J, Kondoh H, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Kohno N, et al. Detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities of the lungs on digitized chest radiographs: acceptable data compression ratios. AJR 1996; 167: 111-115.
5. Silber S, Dorr R, Zindler G, Muhling H, Diebel T. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. Int J Cardiol 1997; 60: 195-200.
6. Smith I, Roszkowski A, Slaughter R, Sterling D. Acceptable levels of digital image compression in chest radiology. Australas Radiol 2000; 44: 32-35.
7. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, Morris KG, Harrington RA, Sketch MH, et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997; 96: 1157-1164.
8. Beall DP, Shelton PD, Kinsey TV, Horton MC, Fortman BJ, Achenbach S, et al. Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs using 10:1 JPEG compression. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13(2 Suppl): 33-38.
9. Eikelboom RH, Yogesan K, Barry CJ, Constable IJ, Tay-Kearney ML, Jitskaia L, et al. Methods and limits of digital image compression of retinal images for telemedicine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1916-1924.
10. Cox GG, Cook LT, Insana MF. The effects of lossy compression on the detection of subtle pulmonary nodules. Med Phys 1996; 23: 127-132.
11. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WGM. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 6-12.
12. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 20-27.
13. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, Sanderink GCH. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 257-263.
14. Sanderink GCH, Dula K, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF. The loss of image quality in digital panoramic radiography using image compression. In: Farman AG, Ruprecht A, Gibbs SJ, Scarfe WC (eds). Advances in maxillofacial imaging. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1997, pp 299-305.
15. Cziraki S. The reproducibility and accuracy of cephalometric analysis using different digital imaging modalities and image compression. [Thesis.] Toronto, Canada: Graduate Department of Dentistry University of Toronto, 2001.
16. Trapnell CJ, Scarfe WC, Cook JH, Silveira AM, Regennitter FJ, Haskell BS. Diagnostic accuracy of film-based, TIFF and wavelet compressed digital temporomandibular joint images. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13: 38-45.
17. Tirrell B. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging [Thesis.] Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1994.
18. Yokota ET, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown Jr CE. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy. J Endod 1994; 20: 490-494.
19. Tirrell BC, Miles DA, Brown CE, Legan JJ. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 1996; 22: 74-78.
20. Nummikoski PV, Martinez TS, Matteson SR, McDavid WD, Dove SB. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 221: 59-64.
21. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979; 86: 420-428.
22. Portney LC, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1993, pp 60-1, 514.
23. Bohay RN. The sensitivity, specificity and reliability of radiographic diagnosis of posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 639-642.
24. Zakariasen KL, Scott DA, Jensen JR. Endodontic recall radiographs: how reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57: 343-347.
25. Goldman M, Pearson A, Darzenta N. Endodontic success - who's reading the radiograph? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 432-437.
26. Goldman M, Pearson A, Darzenta N. Reliability of radiographic interpretations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38: 287-293.
27. Duinkerke ASH, Van de Poel ACM, DeBoo T, Doesburg WH. Variations in the interpretation of periapical radiolucencies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975; 40: 414-421.
28. Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, Erickson J, Savcenko V. An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10: 60-66.
29. Smith I, Roszkowski A, Slaughter R, Sterling D. Acceptable levels of digital image compression in chest radiology. Australas Radiol 2000; 44: 32-35.
30. Kullendorf B, Petersson K, Rohlin M. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997; 13: 183-189.