Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 626-631

  Masood, Farah ^a   Katz, Jerald O ^b   Hardman, Patrick K ^b   Glaros, Alan G ^b   Spencer, Paulette ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXOSTOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; JAW DISEASE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER CURVE; COLOR; EXOSTOSES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0036559199     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.121704     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chomenko AG. Structure of TMJ as viewed on the pantomograph. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:332-35.
2. Abramovitch K. Practical imaging of TMJ. Tex Dent J 1995;112:43,45-51.
3. White SC, Pharoh MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 205-8.
4. Jacobs JM, Manaster BJ. Digital subtraction arthrography of the temporomandibular joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:344-6.
5. Ludlow JB, Soltmann R, Tyndall DA, Grady JJ. Digitally subtracted linear tomograms: three techniques for measuring condylar displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:614-20.
6. Tyndall DA, Phillips C, Malone-Trahey A, Renner J. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:748-55.
7. Prapanpoch S, Langlais RP, Dove SB, Prihoda TJ, McDavid WD, Nummikoski PV, Preece JW. Digital subtraction of TMJ tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:122-34.
8. Bragger U, Pasquali L. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:209-14.
9. Reddy MS, Bruch JM, Jeffcoat MK, Williams RC. Contrast enhancement as aid to interpretation in digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:763-9.
10. Bragger U, Burgin W, Marconi M, Hasler RU, Lang NP. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI). J Periodontal Res 1994;29:95-102.
11. Stassinakis A, Bragger U, Stojanovic M, Burgin W, Lussi A, Lang NP. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:232-37.
12. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-98.
13. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234-35.
14. Rockette HE, Gur D, Metz CE. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgements in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1992;27:169-72.
15. Keppel G. Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1991. p. 356-61.
16. Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Webber RL. Influence of variations in projected geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:411-20.
17. Dove, SB, McDavid WD, Hamilton KE. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:771-6.
18. Ludlow JB, Gilbert DB, Tyndall DA, Bailey L. Analysis of condylar position on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and sectograph zonogram images. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1995;10:201-9.