Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 258-262

  Bittar Cortez, J A ^a   Passeri, L A ^a   De Almeida, S M ^a   Haiter Neto, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone height; Dental implantation; Radiography, dental; Subtraction technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FILTER; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 33746073029     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/84778143     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kwon JY, Kim YS, Kim CW. Assessing changes of peri-implant bone using digital subtraction radiography. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001; 39: 273-280.
2. Chaytor DV, Zarb GA, Schmitt A, Lewis DW. The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: bone level changes. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1991; 11: 113-125.
3. Weber HP, Buser D, Fiorellini JP, Williams RC. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 1992; 3: 181-188.
4. Meijer HJA, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 250-253.
5. Webber RL, Ruttimann UE, Grondahl HG. X-ray image subtraction as a basis for assessment of periodontal changes. J Periodontol Res 1982; 17: 509-511.
6. Grondahl HG, Grondahl K, Webber RL. A digital subtraction technique for dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983; 55: 96-102.
7. Grondahl K, Sudén S, Grondahl HG. Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Branemark fixtures. Clin Oral Implant Res 1998; 9: 243-250.
8. Jeffcoat MK, Williams RC. Relationship between linear and area measurement of radiographie bone levels utilizing simple computerized techniques. J Periodontol Res 1984; 19: 191-198.
9. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 567-572.
10. Payne AGT, Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WD, Kumara R. Conventional and early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures: two-year results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002; 13: 603-609.
11. Tonetti MS, Pini Prato G, Willians RC, Cortellini P. Periodontal regeneration of human infrabony defects. III. Diagnosis strategies to detect bone gain. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 269-277.
12. Eickholz P, Hausmann E. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 70-73.
13. Danesh-Meyer MJ, Chen ST, Rams TE. Digital subtraction radiography analysis of GTR in human intrabony defects. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2002; 22: 441-449.
14. Sewerin IP. Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 428-433.
15. Schliephake H, Wichmann M, Donnerstag F, Vogt S. Imaging of periimplants bone levels of implants with buccal bone defects. Clin Oral Implant Res 2003; 14: 193-200.