Toxmatch-A chemical classification and activity prediction tool based on similarity measures

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 77-84

  Gallegos Saliner, Ana ^a,b   Poater, Albert ^b,c   Jeliazkova, Nina ^d   Patlewicz, Grace ^a,e   Worth, Andrew P ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^d IDEACONSULT LTD   (Bulgaria)

^e DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical categories; Chemical similarity; QSAR; Read across; Skin irritation and corrosion

Indexed keywords

TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORROSION; EXPERT SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SKIN IRRITATION; TOXICOLOGY;

HUMANS; IRRITANTS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SKIN; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS; SOFTWARE; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 55949109925     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aptula A.O., and Roberts D.W. Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19 (2006) 1097-1105
2. Ashby J. Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or non-carcinogenicity. Environ. Mut. 7 (1985) 919-921
3. Bender A., Mussa H.Y., Glen R.C., and Reiling S. Molecular similarity searching using atom environments, information-based feature selection, and a Naïve Bayesian classifier. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 1 (2004) 170-178
4. Besalú E., Carbó R., Mestres J., and Solà M. Topics in Current Chemistry (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
5. Carbó R., and Calabuig B. Molecular quantum similarity measures and N-dimensional representation of quantum objects. I. Theoretical foundations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 42 (1992) 1681-1693
6. Carbó R., Arnau J., and Leyda L. How similar is a molecule to another? An electron density measure of similarity between two molecular structures. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 17 (1980) 1185-1189
7. Chemicals Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply (CHIP), 2005. (Amendment) Regulations. Available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
8. Cone M.M., Venkataraghavan R., and McLafferty F.W. Molecular structure comparison program for the identification of maximal common substructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 7668-7671
9. Cramer G.M., Ford R.A., and Hall R.L. Estimation of toxic hazard-a decision tree approach. J. Cosmet. Toxicol. 16 (1978) 255-276
10. Cronin M.T.D., Jaworska J.S., Walker J.D., Comber M.H.I., Watts C.D., and Worth A.P. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. Environ. Health Persp. 111 10 (2003) 1391-1401
11. Decision Analysis by Ranking Techniques (DART) v2.0, 2007. Talete, Srl., Milano. Available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
12. Dimitrov S.D., Low L.K., Patlewicz G.Y., Kern P.S., Dimitrova G.D., Comber M.H.I., Phillips R.D., Niemela J., Bailey P.T., and Mekenyan O.G. Skin sensitization: modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates. Int. J. Toxicol. 24 (2005) 189-204
13. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2008. REACH Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Available at: .
14. Gallegos Saliner A. Mini-review on chemical similarity and prediction of toxicity. Curr. Comp. Aided Drug Des. 2 2 (2006) 105-122
15. Gallegos Saliner, A., Patlewicz, G., Worth, A.P., 2006. Review of literature-based models for skin and eye irritation and corrosion. EUR-Scientific and Technical Research series. EUR 22320 EN, 87 pp. Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Available at: .
16. Gallegos Saliner A., Tsakovska I., Pavan M., Patlewicz G., and Worth A. Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential-structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007) 331-342
17. Gerner I., Schlegel K., Walker J.D., and Hulzebos E. Use of physicochemical property limits to develop rules for identifying chemical substances with no skin irritation or corrosion potential. QSAR Comb. Sci. 23 (2004) 726-733
18. Gerner I., Barratt M.D., Zinke S., Schlegel K., and Schlede E. Development and prevalidation of a list of structure-activity relationship rules to be used in expert systems for prediction of the skin-sensitising properties of chemicals. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 32 (2004) 487-509
19. Good A.C., Hodgkin E.E., and Richards W.G. Utilization of Gaussian functions for rapid evaluation of molecular similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32 (1992) 188-191
20. Hodgkin E.E., and Richards W.G. Molecular similarity based on electrostatic potential and electric field. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14 (1987) 105-110
21. Holliday J.D., Ranade S.S., and Willett P. A fast algorithm for selecting sets of dissimilar molecules from large chemical databases. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 14 (1995) 501-506
22. Hulzebos E., Sijm D., Traas T., Posthumus R., and Maslankiewicz L. Validity and validation of expert (Q)SAR systems. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 16 (2005) 385-401
23. Hulzebos E., Walker J.D., Gerner I., and Schlegel K. Use of structural alerts to develop rules for identifying chemical substances with skin irritation or skin corrosion potential. QSAR Comb. Sci. 24 (2005) 332-342
24. Jaworska J., and Nikolova-Jeliazkova N. How can structural similarity analysis help in category formation. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007) 195-207
25. Kubinyi H. Chemical similarity and biological activities. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 13 (2002) 717-726
26. Netzeva, T.I., Worth, A.P., Aldenberg, T., Benigni, R., Cronin, M.T.D., Gramatica, P., Jaworska, J.S., Kahn, S., Klopman, G., Marchant, C.A., Myatt, G., Nikolova-Jeliazkova, N., Patlewicz, G.Y., Perkins, R., Roberts, D.W., Schultz, T.W., Stanton, D.T., van, de, Sandt, J.J.M., Tong, W., Veith, G., Yang, C., 2005. Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 33, 155-173.
27. Nikolova N., and Jaworska J. Approaches to measure chemical similarity-a review. QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2004) 1006-1026
28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2004. The Report from the expert group on (quantitative) structure activity relationship ([Q]SARs) on the principles for the validation of (Q)SARs. OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 49. ENV/JM/MONO(2004)24. Available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2007. Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models. OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 69. ENV/JM/MONO(2007)2. Available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
30. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), 2006a. Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union L 396/1 of 30.12.2006, Luxembourg.
31. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), 2006b. Directive 2006/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances in order to adapt it to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Off. J. Eur. Union L 396/850 of 30.12.2006, Luxembourg.
32. Patlewicz G., Jeliazkova N., Gallegos Saliner A., and Worth A.P. Toxmatch-a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 19 (2008) 397-412
33. Payne M.P., and Walsh P.T. Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential: development of structural alerts for use in knowledge-based toxicity prediction systems. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 34 (1994) 154-161
34. Robert D., and Carbó-Dorca R. A formal comparison between molecular quantum similarity measures and indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 38 (1998) 620-623
35. Rorije, E., Hulzebos, E., 2005. Evaluation of (Q)SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential. Physico-chemical exclusion rules. Report submitted by the National Institute of Public Health and Environment (RIVM) to the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Available at: .
36. Steinbeck C., Han Y., Kuhn S., Horlacher O., Luttmann E., and Willighagen E. The chemistry development kit (CDK): an open-source java library for chemo and bioinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 2 (2003) 493-500
37. Tou J.T., and González R.C. In Pattern Recognition Principles (1974), Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
38. Toxmatch v1.50, 2007. Ideaconsult, Ltd., Sofia. Available at: . Toxmatch User Manual available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
39. Toxtree v1.50, 2007. Ideaconsult, Ltd., Sofia. Available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
40. Verhaar H.J.M., van Leeuwen C.J., and Hermens J.L.M. Classifying environmental pollutants. 1. Structure-activity relationships for prediction of aquatic toxicity. Chemosphere 25 (1992) 471-491
41. Verhaar H.J.M., Solbe J., Speksnijder J., van Leeuwen C.J., and Hermens J.L.M. Classifying environmental pollutants: Part 3. External validation of the classification system. Chemosphere 40 (2000) 875-883
42. Walter J.D., Gerner I., Hulzebos E., and Schlegel K. The skin irritation corrosion rules estimation tool (SICRET). QSAR Comb. Sci. 24 (2005) 378-384
43. Witten, I.H., Frank, E. In Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, 2005. Available at: (last accessed 10.3.2008).
44. Worth, A.P., Bassan, A., Gallegos, A., Netzeva, T.I., Patlewicz, G., Pavan, M., Tsakovska, I., Vracko, M. The Characterisation of (Quantitative) structure-activity relationships: preliminary guidance. EUR-Scientific and Technical Research series. EUR 21866 EN, 95 pp. Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2005.
45. Worth, A., Patlewicz, G. 2007a. Insights, Lessons learnt, and Experiences that helped to shape the REACH guidance on chemical categories and read-across: a compendium of case studies. EUR-Scientific and Technical Research series. EUR 22481 EN, 270 pp. Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
46. Worth, A., Bassan, A., Fabjan, E., Gallegos Saliner, A., Netzeva, T., Patlewicz, G., Pavan, M., Tsakovska, I. The use of computational methods in the grouping and assessment of chemicals-preliminary investigations. EUR-Scientific and Technical Research series. EUR 22941 EN, 125 pp. Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2007b. Available at: .
47. Worth A.P., Bassan A., de Bruijn J., Gallegos Saliner A., Netzeva T., Patlewicz G., Pavan M., Tsakovska I., and Eisenreich E. The role of the European chemicals bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007) 111-125
48. a, and logD. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002) 796-805