Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: A two-year clinical trial

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 399-405

  Türkün, L Şebnem ^a   Çelik, Esra Uzer ^b  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Antibacterial adhesive; Clinical trial; MDPB; Nanocomposite; Polyacid modified resin composite

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CLEARFIL PROTECT BOND; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; FILTEK SUPREME; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; NANOCOMPOSITES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASES;

EID: 55349086221     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions. Am J Dent 2006;19:289-292.
2. ADA Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association, January 1994.
3. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Chung I, Pashley DH, Campbell JA, Laffoon JE, Qian F. Resin-dentin interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile dentin bond strength after five-year water storage. Oper Dent 2004;29:705-712.
4. Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Am J Dent 2004;17:147-150.
5. Efes BG, Dörfer C, Gömeç Y. Clinical evaluation of an ormocer, a nanofill composite and a hybrid composite at 2 years. Am J Dent 2006;19:236-240.
6. Ergucu Z, Türkün LS. Clinical performance of novel resin composites in posterior teeth: 18-month results. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:209-216.
7. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid modified resin composites and a resin modified glass ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int 2002;33:542-548.
8. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:119-125.
9. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hikel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials - 3-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:31-39.
10. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions: 5 year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:153-156.
11. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12:161-166.
12. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE, Davidson JM. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials. Oper Dent 2005;30:275-281.
13. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Effect of long-term water storage on dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1995;8:109-111.
14. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-1391.
15. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-47.
16. Huang C, Tay FR, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Wei SH, Pashley DH. Hygroscopic expansion of a compomer and a composite on artificial gap reduction. J Dent 2002;30:11-19.
17. Imazato S, Ebi N, Tarumi H, Russell RR, Kaneko T, Ebisu S. Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB. Biomaterials 1999;20:899-903.
18. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003;19:449-457.
19. Kalachandra S, Wilson TW. Water sorption and mechanical properties of light cured proprietary composite tooth restorative materials. Biomaterials 1992;13:105-109.
20. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:323-332.
21. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM, Fisher AC. Hygroscopic expansion and solubility of composite restoratives. Dent Mater 2003;19:77-86.
22. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:593-599.
23. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382-1390.
24. Mjör IA, Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:25-30.
25. Mohsen NM, Craig RG. Hydrolytic stability of silanated zirconia-silica-urethane dimethacrylate composites. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:213-220.
26. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996;9:15-18.
27. Önal B, Pamir T. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1547-1555.
28. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:7-10.
29. Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:1248-1254.
30. Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994;7:252-254.
31. Türkün LS. The clinical performance of one-and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one-year. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:656-664.
32. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998;23:77-80.
33. Tyas MJ. The class V lesion-aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995;40:167-170.
34. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-69.