Clinical performance of novel resin composites in posterior teeth: 18-month results

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 209-216

  Ergücü, Zeynep ^a   Türkün, L Sebnem ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Antibacterial adhesive; Nanofill; Nanohybrid; Posterior restorations

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL PROTECT BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK SUPREME; GRANDIO; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 34248179069     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. 3M Dental Products Filtek Supreme Plus Universal Restorative System. Technical Product Profile. St Paul M N, USA, 2005:9-12.
2. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procdures. J Biomater Appl 2004;19:121-34.
3. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift Jr ER. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:687-701.
4. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater Jan 16. (Epub of ahead of print)
5. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:63-70.
6. Bryant RW. Direct posterior composite resin restorations: a review. 1. Factors influencing case selection. Aust Dent J 1992;37:81-7.
7. Clinician's preferences 2001. CRA Newsletter 2001;25:1-4.
8. Denehy GE. A direct approach to restore anterior teeth. Am J Dent 2000;13(special issue):55-9.
9. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface Roughness of Novel Resin Composites Polished with One-step Systems. Oper Dent 2007;32:185-192.
10. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer F, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B. Two year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Invest 2006;10:119-125.
11. Fortin D, Vargas MA. Two spectrums of composites: new techniques and materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(supplement):26S-30S.
12. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Eimer F, Krämer N. Posterior restorations with a nanofilled resin composite- results after 12 months. J Dent Res 2005;(abstracts Baltimore):579.
13. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class 1 and Class 2 composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-32.
14. Haller B. Recent development in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13:44-50.
15. Imazato S, Ebi N, Tarumi H, Russell RRB, Kaneko T, Ebisu S. Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB. Biomaterials 1999;20:899-903.
16. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater 2003;19:313-319.
17. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Incorporation of antibacterial monomer MDPB in dentin primer. J Dent Res1997;76:768-772.
18. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003;19:449-457.
19. Leinfelder KF, Taylor DF, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1986;2:198-201.
20. Leinfelder KF, Wilder AD Jr., Teixeira LC. Wear rates of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:829-833.
21. Leinfelder KF. Evaluation of criteria used for assessing the clinical performance of composite resins in posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:531-536.
22. Mesquita RV, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstofer J. Dynamic visco-elastic properties of dental composite resins. Dent Mater 2005;Sep 2 (Epub ahead of print)xxAuthor: Can't be, if published in 2005!!.
23. Miller MB. Self-etching adhesives: solving the sensitivity conundrum. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:406.
24. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382-90.
25. Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004;16:211-217.
26. Moszner N, Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental composites. Int J Nanotechnol 2004;1:130-156.
27. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001;26:535-576.
28. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
29. Raskin A, Michette-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
30. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
31. Silness P, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy . Acta Odontol Scand 1964;2:121-135.
32. Terry DA. Direct applications of a nanocomposite resin system. Part 1. The evoluotion of contemporary composite materials. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004;16:417-422.
33. Türkün LS. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 2003;31:527-534.
34. Türkün LS. The clinical performance of one-and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:656-664.
35. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nanostructured dental composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006 Jan 30. (Epub ahead of print)
36. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
37. Voco Grandio. Light-curing Nano-hybrid Filling Material, Corresponds to EN 24049/ ISO 4049 Instructions for use. April 2003.