Feasibility of gadofosveset-enhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels at 3 tesla with dixon fat saturation

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 635-641

  Michaely, Henrik J ^a,b   Attenberger, Ulrike I ^b   Dietrich, Olaf ^b   Schmitt, Peter ^c   Nael, Kambiz ^d   Kramer, Harald ^b   Reiser, Maximilian F ^b   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a,b   Walz, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Dixon fat saturation; Gadofosveset; Intravascular contrast agent; Magnetic resonance angiography; Peripheral arteries; Steady state

Indexed keywords

FAT; GADOFOSVESET; WATER; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIXON FAT SATURATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MUSCLE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEADY STATE; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTERY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LEG; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; ARTERIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 55249093735     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817ee53a     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Leiner T. Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;16:21-66.
2. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology. 1999;211:59-67.
3. DiehmN, Kickuth R, Baumgartner I, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:467-476.
4. Kramer H, Michaely HJ, Matschl V, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:477-483.
5. Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, et al. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced MR-angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:642-649.
6. Kramer H, Zenge M, Schmitt P, et al. Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with continuous table movement at 3. 0 T-initial experience compared to step-by-step MRA. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:627-634.
7. Lauffer RB, Parmelee DJ, Dunham SU, et al. MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:529-538.
8. Grist TM, Korosec FR, Peters DC, et al. Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. Radiology. 1998;207:539-544.
9. Nikolaou K, Kramer H, Grosse C, et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. Radiology. 2006;241:861-872.
10. Wang MS, Haynor DR, Wilson GJ, et al. Maximizing contrast-to-noise ratio in ultra-high resolution peripheral MR angiography using a blood pool agent and parallel imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:580-588.
11. Hartmann M, Wiethoff AJ, Hentrich HR, et al. Initial imaging recommendations for Vasovist angiography. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(suppl 2): B15-B23.
12. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1984;153: 189-194.
13. Huegli RW, Tirman PF, Bonel HM, et al. Use of the modified three-point Dixon technique in obtaining Tl-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-saturated images on an open magnet. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1781-1786.
14. Ma J, Vu AT, Son JB, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique for contrast agent enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:36-41.
15. Reeder SB, McKenzie CA, Pineda AR, et al. Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:644-652.
16. Parmelee DJ, Walovitch RC, Ouellet HS, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and elimination of MS-325, a blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1997; 32:741-747.
17. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 1999;212: 876-884.
18. Ma J. Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:415-419.
19. Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, et al. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:375-385.
20. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, et al. Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:748-754.
21. Reeder SB, Markl M, Yu H, et al. Cardiac CINE imaging with IDEAL water-fat separation and steady-state free precession. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22:44-52.
22. Reeder SB, Hargreaves BA, Yu H, et al. Homodyne reconstruction and IDEAL water-fat decomposition. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:586-593.
23. Meissner OA, Rieger J, Weber C, et al. Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA. Radiology. 2005;235:308-318.
24. Herborn CU, Lauenstein TC, Vogt FM, et al. Interstitial MR lymphography with MS-325: characterization of normal and tumor-invaded lymph nodes in a rabbit model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1567-1572.
25. Lin W, Abendschein DR, Haacke EM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arterial wall in pigs. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:183-190.