Critical limb ischemia: Hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA

Radiology

Volumn 235, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 308-318

  Meissner, Oliver A ^a   Rieger, Johannes ^a   Weber, Christof ^a   Siebert, Uwe ^b,c   Steckmeier, Bernd ^b   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BYPASS SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMB AMPUTATION; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 15944429689     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2343031685     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000; 31(1 pt 2):S1-S296.
2. Ouriel K, Fiore WM, Geary JE. Limb-threatening ischemia in the medically compromised patient: amputation or revascularization? Surgery 1988; 104:667-672.
3. Morsey H, Aslam M, Standfield N. Patients with critical ischemia of the lower limb are at risk of developing kidney dysfunction. Am J Surg 2003; 185:360-363.
4. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990; 175:621-628.
5. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:170-177.
6. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, Woodson J, Yucel EK. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:45-53.
7. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA. MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 2000; 214:325-338.
8. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA 1995; 274:875-880.
9. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1577-1581.
10. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999; 210:683-688.
11. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1127-1135.
12. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Semonsen KG, Leonardo VJ, Kojima K, Szumowski J. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:693-701.
13. Li W, Zhang M, Sher S, Edelman RR. MR angiography of the vascular tree from the aorta to the foot: combining two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:884-889.
14. Carpenter JP, Owen RS, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral runoff vessels. J Vasc Surg 1992; 16:807-813; discussion 813-815.
15. Saito Y, Yodono H, Noda H, Itabashi Y, Sasaki T. Table-moving contrast-enhanced MRA of the lower extremities in patients with arterial occlusive disease: its diagnostic accuracy and reliability in comparison with IA-DSA (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003; 168.
16. Huber A, Heuck A, Baur A, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1291-1298.
17. Khilnani NM, Winchester PA, Prince MR, et al. Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning. Radiology 2002; 224:63-74.
18. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:551-556.
19. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Prince MR, Londy F, Knopp MA. Arterial-phase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: strategies for timing and contrast media Injection - original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:506-514.
20. Singh S, Evans L, Datta D, Gaines P, Beard JD. The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12:359-362.
21. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992; 182:243-246.
22. Dorweiler B, Neufang A, Kreitner KF, Schmiedt W, Oelert H. Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:766-772.
23. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:171-179.
24. Goldman JP, Lookstein R. 31 second four station moving table bolus chase MRA with venous compression: have we finally eliminated the problem of venous contamination in PV-MRA? (abstr). Presented at the 15th Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Dublin, Ireland, October 26, 2003.
25. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:683-692.
26. Ho VB, Choyke PL, Foo TK, et al. Automated bolus chase peripheral MR experiences and future directions of this. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:376-388.
27. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JH. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: time by automating the detection of contrast aorta. Radiology 1997; 203:109-114.
28. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67.
29. Vigen KK, Peters DC, Grist TM, Block WF, Mistretta CA. Undersampled projection-reconstruction imaging for time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:170-176.
30. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography - initial results. Radiology 2001; 221:266-272.
31. Fain SB, Du J, Browning FJ. Floating table Isotropic projection imaging (FLIPR): a technique for fast, extended FOV, contrast-enhanced MRA (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002; 212.