Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature

Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-66

  Leiner, Tim ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Radiology ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance angiography, contrast enhanced; Mesenteric ischemia, magnetic resonance; Peripheral arterial disease, magnetic resonance; Portal vein, magnetic resonance; Renal artery stenosis, magnetic resonance

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; DIHYDROERGOTAMINE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBENIC ACID; GADOBUTROL; GADOLINIUM CHELATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ABDOMEN; ABDOMINAL ANGINA; ABDOMINAL AORTA; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ABDOMINAL TUMOR; ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ANEURYSM; AORTA BIFURCATION; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTERY THROMBOSIS; BEHCET DISEASE; BUDD CHIARI SYNDROME; BUERGER DISEASE; BYPASS SURGERY; CELIAC ARTERY STENOSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONGENITAL BLOOD VESSEL MALFORMATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE COURSE; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EHLERS DANLOS SYNDROME; ENTERITIS; ERGOTISM; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; GIANT CELL ARTERITIS; HEPATIC VEIN; HOMOCYSTINURIA; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC COLITIS; ISCHEMIC ENTERITIS; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; LEG BLOOD VESSEL; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVER VEIN OBSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MARFAN SYNDROME; MESENTERIC ARTERY OCCLUSION; MUCOCUTANEOUS LYMPH NODE SYNDROME; NEUROFIBROMATOSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POLYARTERITIS NODOSA; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PORTAL HYPERTENSION; PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOOBSTRUCTION; PSEUDOXANTHOMA ELASTICUM; RADIATION INJURY; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SYSTEMIC VASCULITIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; VASCULAR DISEASE; VASCULAR TUMOR;

ABDOMEN; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; VASCULAR DISEASES; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 31944433754     PISSN: 08993459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000185431.50535.d7     Document Type: Review

References (237)

1. Wedeen VJ, Meuli RA, Edelman RR, et al. Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. Science. 1985;230:946-948.
2. Ekelund L, Sjoqvist L, Thuomas KA, et al. MR angiography of abdominal and peripheral arteries. Techniques and clinical applications. Acta Radiol. 1996;37:3-13.
3. Swan JS, Grist TM, Weber DM, et al. MR angiography of the pelvis with variable velocity encoding and a phased-array coil. Radiology. 1994;190:363-369.
4. Goyen M, Heuser LJ. Improved peripheral MRA using multi-velocity-encoding phase contrast-enhanced MRA techniques. Acta Radiol. 2000; 41:139-141.
5. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al. Peripheral MR angiography. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1765-1774.
6. Meaney JF. Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:836-852.
7. Mustert BR, Williams DM, Prince MR. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16:301-310.
8. Felmlee JP, Ehman RL. Spatial presaturation: a method for suppressing flow artifacts and improving depiction of vascular anatomy in MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;164:559-564.
9. Ehman RL, Felmlee JP. Flow artifact reduction in MRI: a review of the roles of gradient moment nulling and spatial presaturation. Magn Reson Med. 1990;14:293-307.
10. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:45-53.
11. Miyazaki M, Takai H, Sugiura S, et al. Peripheral MR angiography: separation of arteries from veins with flow-spoiled gradient pulses in electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo imaging. Radiology. 2003;227:890-896.
12. Miyazaki M, Sugiura S, Tateishi F, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:776-783.
13. Foo TK, Ho VB, Marcos HB, et al. MR angiography using steady-state free precession. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:699-706.
14. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2409-2418.
15. Ho KY, Leiner T, van Engelshoven JM. MR angiography of run-off vessels. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1285-1289.
16. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, et al. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:283-291.
17. Boos M, Scheffler K, Haselhorst R, et al. Arterial first pass gadolinium-CM dynamics as a function of several intravenous saline flush and Gd volumes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:568-576.
18. Prince MR. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: theory and optimization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1998;6:257-267.
19. Maki JH, Chenevert TL, Prince MR. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;8:322-344.
20. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, et al. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;203:275-280.
21. Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Ugolotti U, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical ordering and fluoroscopic triggering of the renal arteries. Radiol Med (Torino). 2003;105:42-47.
22. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:673-681.
23. Leiner T, de Weert TT, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Need for background suppression in contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:724-733.
24. Ruehm SG, Nanz D, Baumann A, et al. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vessels: value of image subtraction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:402-411.
25. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J, et al. Improved multi-station peripheral MR angiography with a dedicated vascular coil. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:475-480.
26. Fellner FA, Requardt M, Lang W, et al. Peripheral vessels: MR angiography with dedicated phased-array coil with large-field-of-view adapter feasibility study. Radiology. 2003;228:284-289.
27. Leiner T, Nijenhuis RJ, Maki JH, et al. Use of a three-station phased array coil to improve peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:417-425.
28. Wang Y, Chen CZ, Chabra SG, et al. Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2002;37: 458-463.
29. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:671-677.
30. Bezooijen R, van den Bosch HC, Tielbeek AV, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivity-encoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. Radiology. 2004;231:263-271.
31. de Vries M, Nijenhuis RJ, Hoogeveen RM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:37-45.
32. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:170-177.
33. Morasch MD, Collins J, Pereles FS, et al. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:62-71.
34. Westenberg JJ, Wasser MN, van der Geest RJ, et al. Gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injection: scan optimization in vitro and in vivo. Int J Card Imaging. 1999;15:161-173.
35. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Improved centric phase encoding orders for three-dimensional magnetization-prepared MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:384-392.
36. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology. 2002;225:583-588.
37. Hu HH, Madhuranthakam AJ, Kruger DG, et al. Improved venous suppression and spatial resolution with SENSE in elliptical centric 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:761-765.
38. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:345-351.
39. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:671-675.
40. Hoogeveen RM, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J. Fast, dynamic high resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography with CENTRA keyhole and SENSE. 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Kyoto, Japan: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004:9.
41. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology. 2002;225:43-52.
42. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography initial results. Radiology. 2001;221:266-272.
43. Foo TK, Ho VB, Hood MN, et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR imaging of lower-extremity peripheral vasculature with segmented volume acquisition: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219:835-841.
44. Herborn CU, Ajaj W, Goyen M, et al. Peripheral vasculature: whole-body MR angiography with midfemoral venous compression-initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:872-878.
45. Bilecen D, Schulte AC, Bongartz G, et al. Infragenual cuff-compression reduces venous contamination in contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the calf. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:347-351.
46. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:1228-1235.
47. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MN, et al. Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18:13-22.
48. Schmiedl U, Moseley ME, Ogan MD, et al. Comparison of initial bio-distribution patterns of Gd-DTPA and albumin-(Gd-DTPA) using rapid spin echo MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11:306-313.
49. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D Contrast MR Angiography. Berlin: Springer; 2003.
50. Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, et al. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2103-2114.
51. Goyen M, Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, et al. 0.5 M Gd chelate (Magnevist) versus 1.0 M Gd chelate (Gadovist): dose-independent effect on image quality of pelvic three-dimensional MR-angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:602-607.
52. Knopp MV, Tengg-Kobligk H, Floemer F, et al. Contrast agents for MRA: future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:314-316.
53. Rofsky NM, Morana G, Adelman MA, et al. Improved gadolinium-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the femoropopliteal arteries: reintroduction of osseous anatomic landmarks. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1009-1011.
54. Westenberg JJ, Wasser MN, van der Geest RJ, et al. Scan optimization of gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injections and in vitro validation of stenosis quantification. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17:47-57.
55. Huang Y, Webster CA, Wright GA. Analysis of subtraction methods in three-dimensional contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:541-550.
56. Hany TF, Schmidt M, Davis CP, et al. Diagnostic impact of four post-processing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:907-912.
57. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology. 2000;217:105-114.
58. Kadir S. Celiac, superior, and inferior mesenteric arteries. In: Atlas of Normal and Variant Angiographic Anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1991:297-364.
59. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:908-913.
60. Wasser MN, Geelkerken RH, Kouwenhoven M, et al. Systolically gated 3D phase contrast MRA of mesenteric arteries in suspected mesenteric ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:262-268.
61. Granger DN, Kvietys PR. The splanchnic circulation: intrinsic regulation. Annu Rev Physiol. 1981;43:409-418.
62. 2 consumption under low flow conditions in anaesthetized cats. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1977;94: 573-578.
63. 2 consumption of the small intestine in low flow. Acta Physiol Acad Sci Hung. 1978;52: 381-390.
64. Moawad J, Gewertz BL. Chronic mesenteric ischemia. Clinical presentation and diagnosis. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:357-369.
65. Meaney JF, Prince MR, Nostrant TT, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of visceral arteries in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:171-176.
66. Lee VS, Morgan JN, Tan AG, et al. Celiac artery compression by the median arcuate ligament: a pitfall of end-expiratory MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;228:437-442.
67. Chow LC, Chan FP, Li KC. A comprehensive approach to MR imaging of mesenteric ischemia. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:507-516.
68. Stafford-Johnson DB, Hamilton BH, Dong Q, et al. Vascular complications of liver transplantation: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:153-160.
69. Hallscheidt PJ, Fink C, Haferkamp A, et al. Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus using multidetector CT and MRI: prospective study with histopathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:64-68.
70. Gaa J, Georgi M. Non-invasive imaging of abdominal vascular pathologies. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:507-516.
71. Hilfiker PR, Weishaupt D, Kacl GM, et al. Comparison of three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with a blood pool contrast agent and nuclear scintigraphy for the detection of experimentally induced gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut. 1999;45:581-587.
72. Chan FP, Chhor CM. Active lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography: case report. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:637-639.
73. Kadir S. The portal venous system and hepatic veins. In: Atlas of Normal and Variant Angiographic Anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1991:365-387.
74. Bromley PJ, Kaufman JA. Portal and hepatic veins. In: Kaufman JA, Lee MJ, eds. Vascular and Interventional Radiology. The Requisites. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2004:377-406.
75. Lafortune M, Marleau D, Breton G, et al. Portal venous system measurements in portal hypertension. Radiology. 1984;151:27-30.
76. Vosshenrich R, Fischer U. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal vessels: is there still a role for angiography? Eur Radiol. 2002;12:218-230.
77. Hussain HK, Nghiem HV. Imaging of hepatic transplantation. Clin Liver Dis. 2002;6:247-270, viii-ix.
78. Sahani D, D'Souza R, Kadavigere R, et al. Evaluation of living liver transplant donors: method for precise anatomic definition by using a dedicated contrast-enhanced MR imaging protocol. Radiographics. 2004;24:957-967.
79. Hough TJ, Raptopoulos V, Siewert B, et al. Teardrop superior mesenteric vein: CT sign for unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1509-1512.
80. Goyen M. MR angiography of the portal venous system. In: Schneider G, Prince MR, Meaney JF, Ho VB, eds. Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Techniques, Indications and Practical Applications. Milan, Italy: Springer; 2005:245-256.
81. Morrin MM, Pedrosa I, Rofsky NM. Magnetic resonance imaging for disorders of liver vasculature. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;13:177-190.
82. Sarin SK, Agarwal SR. Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:43-58.
83. Sobhonslidsuk A, Reddy KR. Portal vein thrombosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:535-541.
84. Ludwig J, Hashimoto E, McGill DB, et al. Classification of hepatic venous outflow obstruction: ambiguous terminology of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990;65:51-55.
85. Menon KV, Shah V, Kamath PS. The Budd-Chiari syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:578-585.
86. Laragh J. Harry Goldblatt 1891-1977. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1978;91:24-27.
87. Hillman BJ. Imaging advances in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:5-14.
88. Derkx FH, Schalekamp MA. Renal artery stenosis and hypertension. Lancet. 1994;344:237-239.
89. Eardley KS, Lipkin GW. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: is it worth diagnosing? J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13:217-220.
90. Safian RD, Textor SC. Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:431-442.
91. Working Group on Renovascular Hypertension. Detection, evaluation, and treatment of renovascular hypertension. Final report. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:820-829.
92. Slovut DP, Olin JW. Fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1862-1871.
93. Schreij G, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. Interpretation of renal angiography by radiologists. J Hypertens. 1999;17:1737-1741.
94. Kaufman JA. Renal arteries. In: Kaufman JA, Lee MJ, eds. Vascular and Interventional Radiology. The Requisites. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2004: 323-349.
95. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:674-682; discussion 682.
96. Bude RO, Forauer AR, Caoili EM, et al. Is it necessary to study accessory arteries when screening the renal arteries for renovascular hypertension? Radiology. 2003;226:411-416.
97. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:401-411.
98. Schoenberg SO, Prince MR, Knopp MV, et al. Renal MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1998;6:351-370.
99. Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1385-1388.
100. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:685-696.
101. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:642-651.
102. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:497-504.
103. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Kirsch M, et al. Contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: optimization of technique and pitfalls. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:912-923.
104. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, et al. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2001;218:481-490.
105. Grenier N, Basseau F, Ries M, et al. Functional MRI of the kidney. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:164-175.
106. Zhang HL, Schoenberg SO, Resnick LM, et al. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: combining gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with functional magnetic resonance pulse sequences. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:1079-1082.
107. Yim PJ, Cebral JR, Weaver A, et al. Estimation of the differential pressure at renal artery stenoses. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:969-977.
108. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, et al. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology. 1997;205:128-136.
109. Schoenberg SO, Just A, Bock M, et al. Noninvasive analysis of renal artery blood flow dynamics with MR cine phase-contrast flow measurements. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H2477-H2484.
110. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:158-169.
111. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Johnson G, et al. MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility. Radiology. 2001;221:371-379.
112. de Priester JA, den Boer JA, Christiaans MH, et al. Automated quantitative evaluation of diseased and nondiseased renal transplants with MR renography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:95-103.
113. Binkert CA, Debatin JF, Schneider E, et al. Can MR measurement of renal artery flow and renal volume predict the outcome of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;24:233-239.
114. Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallett JW Jr. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1009-1014.
115. Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1167-1172.
116. Reed WW, Hallett JW Jr, Damiano MA, et al. Learning from the last ultrasound. A population-based study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2064-2068.
117. Brewster DC, Cronenwett JL, Hallett JW Jr, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:1106-1117.
118. Isselbacher EM. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 2005;111:816-828.
119. Ahn SS, Rutherford RB, Johnston KW, et al. Reporting standards for infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:405-410.
120. Moore WS, Rutherford RB. Transfemoral endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of the North American EVT phase 1 trial. EVT Investigators. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:543-553.
121. Baum RA, Stavropoulos SW, Fairman RM, et al. Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:1111-1117.
122. May J, White GH, Stephen MS, et al. Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: concurrent comparison of outcome of those occurring after endovascular repair versus those occurring without previous treatment in an 11-year single-center experience. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:860-866.
123. Dent TL, Lindenauer SM, Ernst CB, et al. Multiple arteriosclerotic arterial aneurysms. Arch Surg. 1972;105:338-344.
124. Wright LB, Matchett WJ, Cruz CP, et al. Popliteal artery disease: diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics. 2004;24:467-479.
125. Shortell CK, DeWeese JA, Ouriel K, et al. Popliteal artery aneurysms: a 25-year surgical experience. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:771-776; discussion 776-779.
126. Hertzer NR. The natural history of peripheral vascular disease. Implications for its management. Circulation. 1991;83:I12-I19.
127. Brewster DC. Direct reconstruction for aortoiliac occlusive disease. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2000:943-972.
128. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:S1-S296.
129. Menzoian JO, LaMorte WW, Paniszyn CC, et al. Symptomatology and anatomic patterns of peripheral vascular disease: differing impact of smoking and diabetes. Ann Vasc Surg. 1989;3:224-228.
130. Bilecen D, Jager KA, Aschwanden M, et al. Cuff-compression of the proximal calf to reduce venous contamination in contrast-enhanced stepping-table magnetic Resonance angiography. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:510-515.
131. Hughes K, Domenig CM, Hamdan AD, et al. Bypass to plantar and tarsal arteries: an acceptable approach to limb salvage. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1149-1157.
132. Pomposelli FB, Kansal N, Hamdan AD, et al. A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:307-315.
133. Holstein PE, Sorensen S. Limb salvage experience in a multidisciplinary diabetic foot unit. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(Suppl 2):B97-103.
134. Hofmann W, Forstner R, Kofler B, et al. Pedal artery imaging - a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:287-292.
135. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Schurink GW, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:435-444.
136. Alson MD, Lang EV, Kaufman JA. Pedal arterial imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:9-18.
137. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:517-538.
138. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. Predicting venous enhancement in peripheral MRA using a two-station timing bolus. In: 11th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Toronto, Ontario: ISMRM; 2003:91.
139. Kaufman JA. Lower extremity arteries. In: Thrall JA, ed. Vascular and Interventional Radiology. The Requisites. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2004:421.
140. Weishaupt D, Quick HH, Nanz D, et al. Ligating clips for three-dimensional MR angiography at 1.5 T: in vitro evaluation. Radiology. 2000;214:902-907.
141. Meissner OA, Verrel F, Tato F, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1269-1277.
142. Fauci AS. The vasculitis syndromes. In: KJ I, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, eds. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 13th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994:1670-1679.
143. Olin JW. Thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease). N Engl J Med. 2000;343:864-869.
144. Olin JW, Young JR, Graor RA, et al. The changing clinical spectrum of thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease). Circulation. 1990;82: IV3-IV8.
145. Stanson AW. Imaging findings in extracranial (giant cell) temporal arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000;18:S43-S48.
146. Bley TA, Wieben O, Vaith P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging depicts mural inflammation of the temporal artery in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:1062-1063; author reply 1064.
147. Bley TA, Wieben O, Uhl M, et al. High-resolution MRI in giant cell arteritis: imaging of the wall of the superficial temporal artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:283-287.
148. Ko GY, Byun JY, Choi BG, et al. The vascular manifestations of Behcet's disease: angiographic and CT findings. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:1270-1274.
149. O'Duffy JD. Behcet's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:326-328.
150. Bradway MW, Drezner AD. Popliteal aneurysm presenting as acute thrombosis and ischemia in a middle-aged man with a history of Kawasaki disease. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:884-887.
151. Newburger JW, Burns JC. Kawasaki disease. Vasc Med. 1999;4:187-202.
152. Molinari G, Sardanelli F, Zandrino F, et al. Coronary aneurysms and stenosis detected with magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a patient with Kawasaki disease. Ital Heart J. 2000;1:368-371.
153. Greil GF, Stuber M, Botnar RM, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography in adolescents and young adults with Kawasaki disease. Circulation. 2002;105:908-911.
154. Terada LS, Gu Y, Flores SC. AIDS vasculopathy. Am J Med Sci. 2000; 320:379-387.
155. Woolgar JD, Ray R, Maharaj K, et al. Colour Doppler and grey scale ultrasound features of HIV-related vascular aneurysms. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:884-888.
156. Wilcken DE. Overview of inherited metabolic disorders causing cardiovascular disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2003;26:245-257.
157. Wolff KA, Herold CJ, Tempany CM, et al. Aortic dissection: atypical patterns seen at MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;181:489-495.
158. Crivello MS, Porter DH, Kim D, et al. Isolated external iliac artery aneurysm secondary to cystic medial necrosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1986;9:139-141.
159. Germain DP. Clinical and genetic features of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:391-397.
160. Germain DP, Herrera-Guzman Y. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Genet. 2004;47:1-9.
161. Hu X, Plomp AS, van Soest S, et al. Pseudoxanthoma elasticum: a clinical, histopathological, and molecular update. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:424-438.
162. Rooke TW, Joyce JW. Uncommon arteriopathies. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2000:418-434.
163. Schwahn B, Rozen R. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: clinical consequences. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2001; 1:189-201.
164. Yap S. Classical homocystinuria: vascular risk and its prevention. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2003;26:259-265.
165. Ilgit ET, Vural M, Oguz A, et al. Peripheral arterial involvement in neurofibromatosis type 1-a case report. Angiology. 1999;50:955-958.
166. Haust MD. Arterial involvement in genetic diseases. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol. 1987;1:231-285.
167. Terramani TT, Salim A, Hood DB, et al. Hypoplasia of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta: a report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:844-848.
168. Israel G, Krinsky G, Lee V. The "skinny aorta". Clin Imaging. 2002;26:116-121.
169. Boontje AH. Uncommon congenital anomalies of the aorta. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1979;20:33-38.
170. Graham LM, Zelenock GB, Erlandson EE, et al. Abdominal aortic coarctation and segmental hypoplasia. Surgery. 1979;86:519-529.
171. Maldini G, Teruya TH, Kamida C, et al. Combined percutaneous endovascular and open surgical approach in the treatment of a persistent sciatic artery aneurysm presenting with acute limb-threatening ischemia - a case report and review of the literature. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2002;36:403-408.
172. de Boer MT, Evans JD, Mayor P, et al. An aneurysm at the back of a thigh: a rare presentation of a congenitally persistent sciatic artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:99-100.
173. Kadir S. Arteriography of the abdominal aorta and pelvis. In: Diagnostic Angiography. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1986:207-253.
174. Zavaleta EG, Fernandez BB, Grove MK, et al. St. Anthony's fire (ergotamine induced leg ischemia) - a case report and review of the literature. Angiology. 2001;52:349-356.
175. Abraham P, Chevalier JM, Leftheriotis G, et al. Lower extremity arterial disease in sports. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:581-584.
176. Abraham P, Bouye P, Quere I, et al. Past, present and future of arterial endofibrosis in athletes: a point of view. Sports Med. 2004;34:419-425.
177. Schep G, Bender MH, van de Tempel G, et al. Detection and treatment of claudication due to functional iliac obstruction in top endurance athletes: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002;359:466-473.
178. Bender MH, Schep G, de Vries WR, et al. Sports-related flow limitations in the iliac arteries in endurance athletes: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment and future developments. Sports Med. 2004;34:427-442.
179. Andrews RT. Diagnostic angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2000;17:71-111.
180. Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, et al. Imaging characteristics of cystic adventitial disease of the peripheral arteries: presentation as soft-tissue masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:621-625.
181. Cassar K, Engeset J. Cystic adventitial disease: a trap for the unwary. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:93-96.
182. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:1338-1345.
183. Dalman RL, Taylor LM Jr. Basic data related to infrainguinal revascularization procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 1990;4:309-312.
184. Whittemore A. Current techniques for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. Jpn J Surg. 1990;20:627-634.
185. Nguyen LL, Conte MS, Menard MT, et al. Infrainguinal vein bypass graft revision: factors affecting long-term outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40:916-923.
186. Beidle TR, Brom-Ferral R, Letourneau JG. Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:443-448.
187. Idu MM, Buth J, Hop WC, et al. Vein graft surveillance: is graft revision without angiography justified and what criteria should be used? J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:399-411; discussion 412-393.
188. Lundell A, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, et al. Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:26-33; discussion 33-24.
189. Visser K, Idu MM, Buth J, et al. Duplex scan surveillance during the first year after infrainguinal autologous vein bypass grafting surgery: costs and clinical outcomes compared with other surveillance programs. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:123-130.
190. Bendib K, Berthezene Y, Croisille P, et al. Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: value of contrast-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:1036-1042.
191. Loewe C, Cejna M, Lammer J, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:725-732.
192. Bertschinger K, Cassina PC, Debatin JF, et al. Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:215-220.
193. Dorenbeck U, Seitz J, Volk M, et al. Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:60-64.
194. Loewe C, Cejna M, Schoder M, et al. Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:1129-1137.
195. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2005;235:699-708.
196. Binkert CA, Baker PD, Petersen BD, et al. Peripheral vascular disease: blinded study of dedicated calf MR angiography versus standard boluschase MR angiography and film hard-copy angiography. Radiology. 2004;232:860-866.
197. Vavrik J, Rohrmoser GM, Madani B, et al. Comparison of MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography as a basis for planning treatment of lower limb occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:294-301.
198. Huber A, Scheidler J, Wintersperger B, et al. Moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels: comparison of body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1365-1373.
199. Schafer FK, Schafer PJ, Jahnke T, et al. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease - comparison to intra-arterial DSA]. Rofo. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003;175:556-564.
200. Wyttenbach R, Gianella S, Alerci M, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of Gd-DOTA- versus Gd-BOPTA-enhanced peripheral MR angiography, as compared with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2003;227:261-269.
201. Steffens JC, Schafer FK, Oberscheid B, et al. Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:185-192.
202. Nchimi A, Brisbois D, Donkers E, et al. [MR aortofemorography versus DSA: prospective evaluation]. Jbr-Btr. 2002;85:246-251.
203. Cronberg CN, Sjoberg S, Albrechtsson U, et al. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:59-66.
204. Klein WM, Schlejen PM, Eikelboom BC, et al. MR angiography of the lower extremities with a moving-bed infusion-tracking technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26:1-8.
205. Pandharipande PV, Lee VS, Reuss PM, et al. Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: a simple alternative to automated-table techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1583-1589.
206. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1013-1021.
207. Schoenberg SO, Essig M, Hallscheidt P, et al. Multiphase magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal and pelvic arteries: results of a bicenter multireader analysis. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:20-28.
208. Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, et al. Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002;224:270-277.
209. Khilnani NM, Winchester PA, Prince MR, et al. Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning. Radiology. 2002;224:63-74.
210. Carriero A, Maggialetti A, Pinto D, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography MoBI-trak in the study of peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:42-47.
211. Winterer JT, Schaefer O, Uhrmeister P, et al. Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol. 2002;41:153-160.
212. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 2001;357:1086-1091.
213. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, et al. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:45-53.
214. Di Cesare E, Giordano AV, Santarelli B, et al. [MR-angiography with contrast bolus vs digital angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the legs]. Radiol Med (Torino) 2001;102:55-61.
215. Brillet PY, Tassart M, Bazot M, et al. [Investigation of peripheral vascular bed in critical lower limb ischemia: comparative study between arteriography and magnetic resonance angiography]. J Mal Vasc. 2001; 26:31-38.
216. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, et al. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1127-1135.
217. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Symptomatic peripheral vascular tree stenosis. Comparison of subtracted and nonsubtracted 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with fat suppression. Acta Radiol. 2000;41:133-138.
218. Huber A, Heuck A, Baur A, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1291-1298.
219. Lenhart M, Herold T, Volk M, et al. [Contrast media-enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremity arteries using a dedicated peripheral vascular coil system. First clinical results]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 2000;172:992-999.
220. Lundin P, Svensson A, Henriksen E, et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol. 2000;41:125-132.
221. Wikström J, Holmberg A, Johansson L, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:516-523.
222. Bourlet P, De Fraissinnette B, Garcier JM, et al. [Comparative assessment of helical CT-angiography, 2D TOF MR-angiography and 3D gadolinium enhanced MRA in aorto-iliac occlusive disease]. J Radiol. 2000;81:1619-1625.
223. Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Sakaguchi T, et al. Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience. Radiology. 2000;216:909-915.
224. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology. 1999;211:59-67.
225. Link J, Steffens JC, Brossmann J, et al. Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for preinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement. Radiology. 1999;212:371-377.
226. Oberholzer K, Kreitner KF, Kalden P, et al. [MR angiography of peripheral vessels with automatic tracking table technique at 1.0 in comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1999; 171:240-243.
227. Lenhart M, Djavidani B, Volk M, et al. [Contrast medium-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvic and leg vessels with an automated table-feed technique]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1999; 171:442-449.
228. Maspes F, Gandini R, Pocek M, et al. [Breath-hold gadolinium enhanced tree-dimensional MR angiography: personal experience in the thoracic-abdominal area]. Radiol Med (Torino). 1999;98:275-282.
229. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:683-692.
230. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:1066-1072.
231. Perrier E, Dubayle P, Boyer B, et al. [Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with injection of gadolinium and conventional arteriography of the ilio-femoral arteries]. J Radiol. 1998;79:1493-1498.
232. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Szumowski J, et al. Evaluation of the iliac arteries: comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:197-203.
233. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, et al. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:163-169.
234. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, et al. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1139-1144.
235. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, et al. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology. 1997;204:357-362.
236. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology. 1996;198:725-732.
237. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:656-669.