Response surface design evaluation and comparison

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 629-641

  Anderson Cook, Christine M ^a   Borror, Connie M ^b   Montgomery, Douglas C ^c  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

^c Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Design optimality; Fraction of design space plots; Graphical methods; Variance dispersion graphs

Indexed keywords

EID: 55149112817     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.04.004     Document Type: Note

References (58)

1. Anderson-Cook C.M. Statistics roundtable: how to choose the appropriate design. Quality Prog. October (2005) 80-82
2. Anderson-Cook C.M., Borror C.M., and Montgomery D.C. Response by the authors to letter to the editor. J. Quality Tech. 39 (2007) 91-92
3. Anderson-Cook, C.M., Borror, C.M., Jones, B., 2008. Graphical tools for assessing the sensitivity of response surface designs to model misspecification. Technometrics, in press.
4. Atkinson A.C. The design of experiments to estimate the slope of a response surface. Biometrika 57 (1970) 319-328
5. Borkowski J.J. Using a genetic algorithm to generate exact small response surface designs. J. Probab. Statist. Sci. 1 (2003) 65-88
6. Borror C.M., Montgomery D.C., and Myers R.H. Evaluation of statistical designs for experiments involving noise variables. J. Quality Tech. 34 (2002) 54-70
7. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. Robust designs. Biometrika 62 (1975) 347-352
8. Chung, P., Goldfarb, H., Montgomery, D., Borror, C., 2008. Optimal designs for mixture-process experiments involving continuous and categorical noise variables. Quality Tech. Quantitative Management, to appear.
9. Elfving G. Optimum allocation in linear regression theory. Ann. Math. Statist. 23 (1952) 255-262
10. Giovannitti-Jensen A., and Myers R.H. Graphical assessment of the prediction capability of response surface designs. Technometrics 31 (1989) 159-171
11. Goldfarb H.B., Borror C.M., and Montgomery D.C. Mixture-process variable experiments with noise variables. J. Quality Tech. 35 (2003) 393-405
12. Goldfarb H.B., Anderson-Cook C.M., Borror C.M., and Montgomery D.C. Fraction of design space to assess the prediction capability of mixture and mixture-process designs. J. Quality Tech. 36 (2004) 169-179
13. Goldfarb H.B., Borror C.M., Montgomery D.C., and Anderson-Cook C.M. Three-dimensional variance dispersion graphs for mixture-process experiments. J. Quality Tech. 36 (2004) 109-124
14. Hader R.J., and Park S.H. Slope-rotatable central composite designs. Technometrics 20 (1978) 413-418
15. Haines L.M. The application of the annealing algorithm to the construction of exact optimal designs for linear regression models. Technometrics 29 (1987) 439-447
16. Hamada M., Martz H.F., Reese S., and Wilson A. Finding near optimal Bayesian experimental designs via genetic algorithms. Amer. Statist. 55 (2001) 175-181
17. Hamada M., Martz H.F., and Steiner S.H. Accounting for mixture errors in analyzing mixture experiments. J. Quality Tech. 37 (2005) 139-148
18. Heredia-Langner A., Montgomery D.C., Carlyle W.M., and Borror C.M. Genetic algorithms for the construction of D-optimal designs. J. Quality Tech. 35 (2003) 28-36
19. Heredia-Langner A., Montgomery D.C., Carlyle W.M., and Borror C.M. Model-robust optimal designs: a genetic algorithm approach. J. Quality Tech. 36 (2004) 263-279
20. n factorial. Technometrics 17 (1974) 375-384
21. Jang D.H., and Park S.H. A measure and a graphical method for evaluating slope rotatability in response surface designs. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 22 (1993) 1849-1863
22. Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 21 (1959) 229-249
23. Kiefer J., and Wolfowitz J. The equivalence of two extremum problems. Canad. J. Math. 12 (1960) 262-266
24. Kowalski S. 24 run split-plot experiments for robust parameter design. J. Quality Tech. 34 (2002) 399-410
25. Liang L., Anderson-Cook C.M., and Robinson T.J. Fraction of design space plots for split-plot designs. Quality Reliability Eng. Internat. 22 (2006) 275-289
26. Liang L., Anderson-Cook C.M., and Robinson T.J. Cost penalized estimation and prediction evaluation for split-plot designs. Quality Reliability Eng. Internat. 23 (2007) 577-596
27. Liang L., Anderson-Cook C.M., Robinson T.J., and Myers R.H. Three-dimensional variance dispersion graphs for split-plot designs. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 15 (2006) 757-778
28. Lucas J. Letter to the Editor: comments on optimal designs for second-order polynomial models. J. Quality Tech. 39 (2007) 90-91
29. Miró-Quesada G., and del Castillo E. Two approaches for improving the dual response method in robust parameter design. J. Quality Tech. 36 (2004) 154-168
30. Mukerjee R., and Huda S. Minimax second- and third-order designs to estimate the slope of a response surface. Biometrika 72 (1985) 173-178
31. Murty V., and Studden W. Optimal designs for estimating the slope of a polynomial regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 67 (1972) 869-873
32. Myers R.H., and Lahoda S. A generalization of the response surface mean square error criterion with a specific application to the slope. Technometrics 17 (1975) 481-486
33. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. second ed (2002), Wiley, New York
34. Myers R.H., Khuri A., and Vining G. Response surface alternatives to the Taguchi robust parameter design approach. Amer. Statist. 46 (1992) 131-139
35. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C., Vining G.G., Borror C.M., and Kowalski S.M. Response surface methodology: a retrospective and literature survey. J. Quality Tech. 36 (2004) 53-77
36. Myers R.H., Vining G.G., Giovannitti-Jensen A., and Myers S.L. Variance dispersion properties of second-order response surface designs. J. Quality Tech. 24 (1992) 1-11
37. Nair V. Taguchi's parameter design: a panel discussion. Technometrics 34 (1992) 127-161
38. Ozol-Godfrey A., and Anderson-Cook C.M. Fraction of design space plots for reexamining mixture design robustness to measurement errors. J. Statist. Appl. 1 (2007) 171-183
39. Ozol-Godfrey A., Anderson-Cook C.M., and Montgomery D.C. Fraction of design space plots for reexamining model robustness. J. Quality Tech. 37 (2005) 223-235
40. Ozol-Godfrey A., Anderson-Cook C.M., and Robinson T.J. Fraction of design space plots for generalized linear models. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 138 (2007) 203-219
41. Park Y.-J., Richardson D.E., Ozol-Godfrey A., Borror C.M., Anderson-Cook C.M., and Montgomery D.C. Prediction variance properties of second-order response surface designs for cuboidal regions. J. Quality Tech. 37 (2005) 253-266
42. Parker, P.A., Anderson-Cook, C.M., Robinson, T.J., and Liang, L., 2008. Robust split-plot designs. Quality Reliability Eng. Internat., in press.
43. Piepel G.F., and Anderson C.M. Variance dispersion graphs for designs on polyhedral regions. 1992 Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences (1992), American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia 111-117
44. Piepel G.F., Anderson C.M., and Redgate P.E. Variance dispersion graphs for designs on polyhedral regions-revisited. 1993 Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences (1993), American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia 102-107
45. Piepel G.F., Anderson C.M., and Redgate P.E. Response surface designs for irregularly-shaped regions (Parts 1-3). 1993 Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences (1993), American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia 205-227
46. Roquemore R. Hybrid designs for quadratic response surfaces. Technometrics 18 (1976) 419-423
47. Scheffé H. Experiments with mixtures. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 20 (1958) 344-360
48. Steiner S.H., and Hamada M. Making mixtures robust to noise and mixing measurement errors. J. Quality Tech. 29 (1997) 441-450
49. Taguchi G. Introduction to Quality Engineering (1986), UNIPUB/Kraus International, White Plains, NY
50. Taguchi G. System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Cost (1987), UNIPUB/Kraus International, White Plains, NY
51. Vining G.G., and Myers R.H. A graphical approach for evaluating response surface designs in terms of the mean squared error of prediction. Technometrics 33 (1991) 315-326
52. Wald A. On the efficient design of statistical investigations. Ann. Math. Statist. 14 (1943) 134-140
53. Welch W.J. Branch and bound search for experimental designs based on D-optimality and other criteria. Technometrics 24 (1982) 41-48
54. Welch W.J. A mean squared error criterion for the design of experiments. Biometrika 70 (1983) 205-213
55. Welch W., Yu T., Kang S., and Sacks J. Computer experiments for quality control by parameter design. J. Quality Tech. 22 (1990) 15-22
56. Zahran A., Anderson-Cook C.M., and Myers R.H. Fraction of design space to assess the prediction capability of response surface designs. J. Quality Tech. 35 (2003) 377-386
57. Zahran, A., Myers, R.H., 2003. Use of standard factorial designs with generalized linear models. Virginia Tech Department of Statistics Technical Report 03-4.
58. Zhou J. A robust criterion for experimental designs for serially correlated observations. Technometrics 43 (2001) 462-467