Fraction of design space plots for split-plot designs

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 275-289

  Liang, Li ^a,d   Anderson Cook, Christine M ^b,d,e   Robinson, Timothy J ^c,d,e  

^a DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^d AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^e American Society for Quality   (India)

Author keywords

Alphabetic optimally; Design assessment; Graphical methods; Hard to change factors; Restricted randomization; Split plot

Indexed keywords

ALPHABETIC OPTIMALLY; DESIGN ASSESSMENT; HARD-TO-CHANGE FACTORS; RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION; SPLIT-PLOT;

DESIGN FOR TESTABILITY; ERROR STATISTICS; GRAPHIC METHODS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

VALUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33646340409     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.770     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Letsinger JD, Myers RH, Lentner M. Response surface methods for bi-randomization structure. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:381-397.
2. Kowalski S, Vining GG. Split-plot experimentation for process and quality improvement. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 2001; 6:335-350.
3. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology. Wiley: New York, 2002.
4. Liang L, Anderson-Cook CM, Robinson T. Cost penalized estimation and prediction evaluation for split-plot designs. Technical Report 05-1, Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 2005.
5. k-p × s prototype experiments. Technometrics 1997; 39:52-62.
6. Vining GG, Kowalski S, Montgomery DC. Response surface designs within a split-plot structure. Journal of Quality-Technology 2005; 37:115-129.
7. Webb D, Lucas JM, Borkowski JJ. Factorial experiments when factor levels are not necessarily reset. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36:1-11.
8. Kowalski SM, Cornell JA, Vining GG. Split-plot designs and estimation methods for mixture experiments with process variables. Technometrics 2002; 44:72-79.
9. Giovannitti-Jensen A, Myers RH. Graphical assessment of the prediction capacity of response surface designs. Technometrics 1989; 31:159-171.
10. Khuri AI, Harrison JM, Cornell JA. Using quantile plots of the prediction variance for comparing designs for a constrained mixture region: An application involving a fertilizer experiment. Applied Statistics 1999; 48:521-532.
11. Liang L, Anderson-Cook CM, Robinson T, Myers RH. Three-dimensional variance dispersion graphs for split-plot designs. Technical Report 04-4, Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 2004.
12. Zahran AR, Anderson-Cook CM, Myers RH. Fraction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35:377-386.
13. Goldfarb HB, Anderson-Cook CM, Borror CM, Montgomery DC. Fraction of design space to assess the prediction capability of mixture and mixture-process designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36:169-179.