Model-robust optimal designs: A genetic algorithm approach

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 263-279

  Heredia Langner, Alejandro ^a   Montgomery, Douglas C ^b,e   Carlyle, W Matthew ^c,f   Borror, Connie M ^d,g  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^d DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Department of Industrial Engineering ^*  (United States)

^f Operations Research   (United States)

^g Decision Sciences Department

Author keywords

Computer Generated Designs; Multiobjective Optimization; Response Surface Methodology

Indexed keywords

BINARY MIXTURES; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POLYNOMIALS; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMPUTER GENERATED DESIGNS; MULTI-ROBUST OPTIMAL DESIGN; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 1042269264     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2004.11980273     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANDERE-RENDON, J., MONTGOMERY, D. C. and ROLLIER, D. W. (1997). "Design of Mixture Experiments Using Bayesian D-Optimality". Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 451-463.
2. ANDREWS, D. F. (1971). "Sequentially Designed Experiments for Screening out Bad Models with F tests". Biometrika 58, pp. 427-432.
3. ATKINSON, A. C. and Cox, D. R. (1974). "Planning Experiments for Discriminating Between Models". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 36, pp. 321-348.
4. ATKINSON, A. C. and FEDOROV, V. V. (1975). "The Design of Experiments for Discriminating Between Two Rival Models". Biometrika 62, pp. 57-70.
5. BACK, T. (1996). Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
6. BINGHAM, D. R. and LI, W. (2002). "A Class of Optimal Robust Parameter Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 244-259.
7. BORKOWSKI, J. J. (2003). "Using a Genetic Algorithm to Generate Small Exact Response Surface Designs". Journal of Probability and Statistical Science 1, pp. 65-88.
8. BORKOWSKI, J. J. and VALEROSO, E. S. (2002). "Comparison of Design Optimality Criteria of Reduced Models for Response Surface Designs in the Hypercube". Technometrics 43, pp. 468-477.
9. COOK, R. D. and NACHTSHEIM, C. J. (1982). "Model-Robust, Linear-Optimal Designs". Technometrics 24, pp. 49-54.
10. DERRINGER, G. and SUICH, R. (1980). "Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables". Journal of Quality Technology 12, pp. 214-219.
11. DUMOUCHEL, W. and JONES, B. (1994). "A Simple Bayesian Modification of D-Optimal Designs to Reduce Dependence on an Assumed Model". Technometrics 36, pp. 37-47.
12. DYKSTRA, O. (1971). "The Augmentation of Experimental Data to Maximize X'X". Technometrics 13, pp. 682-688.
13. GOVAERTS, B. and SANCHEZ-RUBAL, P. (1992). "Construction of Exact D-optimal Designs for Linear Regression Models Using Genetic Algorithms". Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics and Computer Science 1-2, pp. 153-174.
14. HAMADA. M.; MARTZ, H. F.; REESE, C. S.; and WILSON, A. G. (2001). "Finding Near-Optimal Bayesian Experimental Designs Via Genetic Algorithms". The American Statistician 55, pp. 175-181.
15. HEINSMAN, J. A. and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (1995). "Optimization of a Household Product Formulation Using a Mixture Experiment". Quality Engineering 7, pp. 583-600.
16. HEREDIA-LANGNER, A.; CARLYLE, W. M.; MONTGOMERY, D. C.; BORROR, C. M.; and RUNGER, G. C. (2003). "Genetic Algorithms for the Construction of D-Optimal Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 35, pp. 28-46.
17. HILL, P. D. H. (1978). "A Review of Experimental Design Procedures for Regression Model Discrimination". Technometrics 20, pp. 15-21.
18. HILL, W. J. and HUNTER, W. G. (1974). "Design of Experiments for Subsets of Parameters". Technometrics 26, pp. 425-434.
19. HOLLAND (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
20. KUSSMAUL, K. (1969). "Protection Against Assuming the Wrong Degree in Polynomial Regression". Technometrics 21, pp. 677-682.
21. LI, C. and NACHTSHEIM, C. J. (2000). "Model-Robust Factorial Designs". Technometrics 42, pp. 345-352.
22. MEYER, R. K. and NACHTSHEIM, C. J. (1995). "The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs". Technometrics 1, pp. 60-69.
23. MONTEPIEDRA, G.; MYERS, D.; and YEH, A. B. (1998). "Application of Genetic Algorithms to the Construction of Exact D-Optimal Designs". Journal of Applied Statistics 22, pp. 817-826
24. MYERS, R. H. and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Now York, NY.
25. SAS/QC SOFTWARE VOLUME 2. Usage and Reference. Version 6, First Edition. The SAS Institute, Cary NC.
26. SNEE, R. D. (1985). "Computer-Aided Design of Experiments-Some Practical Experiences". Journal of Quality Technology 17, pp. 222-236.
27. ST. JOHN, R. C. and DRAPER, N. R. (1975). "D-Optimality for Regression Designs: A Review". Technometrics 17, pp. 15-23.
28. WYNN, H. P. (1970). "The Sequential Generation of D-Optimum Experimental Designs". Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41, pp. 1655-1664.
29. WYNN, H. P. (1972). "Results in the Theory and Construction of D-Optimum Experimental Designs". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 34, pp. 133-147.