Cost-penalized estimation and prediction evaluation for split-plot designs

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 577-596

  Liang, Li ^a   Anderson Cook, Christine M ^b   Robinson, Timothy J ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost based comparisons; Optimally criteria; Restricted randomization; Scaled prediction variance

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AIDS; ESTIMATION; MODELS; OPERATING COSTS; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

COST BASED COMPARISONS; OPTIMALLY CRITERIA; RANDOMIZATION; SCALED PREDICTION VARIANCE;

FORECASTING;

EID: 34547841593     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.835     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Dompere KK. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Theory of Fuzzy Decisions: Identification and Measurement Theory. Springer: New York, 2004.
2. Derringer G, Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 1980; 12:214-219.
3. q-r split-plot experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 2000; 32b:39-56.
4. Parker PA, Kowalski SM, Vining GG. Classes of split-plot response surface designs for equivalent estimation. Technical Report 05-6, Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 2005.
5. Huang P, Chen D, Voelkel JO. Minimum-aberration two-level split-plot designs. Technometrics 1998; 40:314-326.
6. Bingham D, Sitter RR. Minimum-aberration two-level fractional factorial split-plot designs. Technometrics 1999; 41:62-70.
7. Bingham D, Sitter RR. Design issues for fractional factorial experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 2001; 33:2-15.
8. Goos P, Vandebroek M. Optimal split-plot designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2001; 33(4)436-450.
9. Goos P, Vandebroek M. D-optimal split-plot designs with given numbers and sizes of whole plots. Technometrics 2003; 45:235-245.
10. Goos P, Vandebroek M. Outperforming completely randomized designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36(1):12-26.
11. Trinca LA, Gilmour SG. Multi-stratum response surface designs. Technometrics 2001; 43:25-33.
12. Letsinger JD, Myers RH, Lentner M. Response surface methods for bi-randomization structure. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:381-397.
13. Ganju J, Lucas JM. Detecting randomization restrictions caused by factors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1999; 81:129-140.
14. Anbari FT, Lucas JM. Super-efficient designs: How to run your experiment for higher efficiency and lower cost. ASQC Technical Conference Transactions. American Society for Quality Control: Milwaukee, WI, 1994; 852-863.
15. Liang L, Anderson-Cook CM, Robinson TJ, Myers RH. Three-dimensional variance dispersion graphs for split-plot designs. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2006; to appear.
16. Liang L, Anderson-Cook CM, Robinson TJ. Fraction of design space plots for split-plot designs. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2006; 22:275-289.
17. Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1959; 21:272-319.
18. Lawler E, Bell M. A method for solving discrete optimization problems. Operations Research 1966; 14:1098-1112.
19. Neuhardt JB, Bradley HE. On the selection of multi-factor experimental arrangements with resource constraints. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1971; 66:618-621.
20. Rafajlowicz E. Minimum cost experimental design with a prescribed information matrix. SIAM Theory of Probability and its Applications 1989; 34:367-370.
21. t, C)-optimal run orders. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2001; 98:293-310.
22. Tack L, Vandebroek M. Trend-resistant and cost-efficient block designs with fixed or random block effects. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 34:422-436.
23. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE. Variance Components. Wiley: New York, 1992.
24. Joiner BL, Campbell C. Designing experiments when run order is important. Technometrics 1976; 18(3):249-259.
25. k-p × s prototype experiments. Technometrics 1997; 39:52-62.
26. Vining GG, Kowalski S, Montgomery DC. Response surface designs within a split-plot structure. Journal of Quality Technology 2005; 37(2):115-129.
27. Webb D, Lucas JM, Borkowski JJ. Factorial experiments when factor levels are not necessarily reset. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36:1-11.
28. Kowalski SM, Cornell JA, Vining GG. Split-plot designs and estimation methods for mixture experiments with process variables. Technometrics 2002; 44:72-79.
29. Liang L, Anderson-Cook CM, Robinson TJ. Cost penalized estimation and prediction evaluation for split-plot designs. LANL Technical Report LA-UR 05-1577, Los Alamos Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2005.
30. Zahran AR, Anderson-Cook CM, Myers RH. Fraction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35:377-386.
31. Heredia-Langner A, Carlyle M, Montgomery DC, Borror CM, Runger G. Genetic algorithms for the construction of D-optimal designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35(1):28-46.