Three-dimensional variance dispersion graphs for split-plot designs

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 757-778

  Liang, Li ^a   Anderson Cook, Christine M ^b   Robinson, Timothy J ^c   Myers, Raymond H ^d  

^a DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central composite design; Design assessment; Graphical tools; Prediction variance; Restricted randomization

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846128426     PISSN: 10618600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/106186006X157117     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anbari, F. T., and Lucas, J. M. (1994), "Super-Efficient Designs: How to Run Your Experiment for Higher Efficiency and Lower Cost," in ASQC Technical Conference Transactions, pp. 852-863.
2. Bingham, D., and Sitter, R. S. (1999), "Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs," Technometrics, 41, 62-70.
3. Bisgaard, S., and Steinberg, D. M. (1997), "The Design and Analysis of Prototype Experiments," Technometrics, 39, 52-62.
4. Borkowski, J. J. (1995), "Spherical Prediction-Variance Properties of Central Composite and Box-Behnken Designs," Technometrics, 37, 399-410.
5. Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C., and Myers, R. H. (2002), "Evaluation of Statistical Designs for Experiments Involving Noise Variables," Journal of Quality Technology, 34, 54-70.
6. Box, G. E. P., and Behnken, D. W. (1960), "Some New Three-Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables," Technometrics, 2, 455-475.
7. Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, New York: Wiley.
8. Box, G. E. P., and Wilson, K. B. (1951), "On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions," Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 1-45.
9. Davison, J. J. (1995), "Response Surface Designs and Analysis for Bi-Randomization Error Structures," unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
10. Edmondson, R. N. (1991), "Agricultural Response Surface Experiments Based on Four-Level Factorial Designs," Biometrics, 47, 1435-1448.
11. Giovannitti-Jensen, A., and Myers, R. H. (1989), "Graphical Assessment of the Prediction Capacity of Response Surface Designs," Technometrics, 31, 159-171.
12. Goldfarb, H. B., Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C. and Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2003), "Three-Dimensional Variance Dispersion Graphs for Mixture-Process Experiments," Journal of Quality Technology, 36, 109-124.
13. Goos, P., and Vandebroek, M. (2001), "Optimal Split-Plot Designs," Journal of Quality Technology, 33,436-450.
14. _ (2003), "D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots," Technometrics, 45, 235-245.
15. _ (2004), "Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs," Journal of Quality Technology, 36, 12-26.
16. Huang, P., Chen, D., and Voelkel, J. O. (1998), "Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs," Technometrics, 40, 314-326.
17. Kenward, M. G., and Roger, J. H. (1997), "Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood," Biometrics, 53, 983-977.
18. Kowalski, S. M., Cornell, J. A., and Vining, G. G. (2002), "Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables," Technometrics, 44, 72-79.
19. Letsinger, J. D., Myers, R. H., and Lentner, M. (1996), "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structure," Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 381-397.
20. Liang, L., Anderson-Cook, C. M., and Robinson, T. (2006a), "Cost Penalized Estimation and Prediction Evaluation for Split-Plot Designs," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, in press.
21. _ (2006b), "Fraction of Design Space Plots for Split-plot Designs," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 275-289.
22. Liang, L., Anderson-Cook, C. M., Robinson, T. J., and Myers, R. H. (2004), "Three-Dimensional Variance Dispersion Graphs For Split-Plot Designs," Technical report 04-4, Dept. of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
23. Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C. (2002), Response Surface Methodology, New York: Wiley.
24. Myers, R. H., Vining, G., Giovannitti-Jensen, A., and Myers, S. L. (1992), "Variance Dispersion Properties of Second-Order Response Surface Designs," Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 1-11.
25. Trinca, L. A., and Gilmour, S. G. (1998), "Variance Dispersion Graphs for Comparing Blocked Response Surface Designs," Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 314-327.
26. _ (1999), "Difference Variance Dispersion Graphs for Comparing Response Surface Designs with Qpplications in Food Technology," Applied Statistics, 48, 441-455.
27. _ (20011, "Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs," Technometrics, 43, 25-33.
28. Vining, G. G. (1993), "A Computer Program for Generating Variance Dispersion Graphs," Journal of Quality Technology, 25, 45-58: Correction, V25, p. 333.
29. Vining, G. G., Kowalski, S., and Montgomery, D. C. (2005), "Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure," Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 115-129.
30. Webb, D., Lucas, J. M., and Borkowski, J. J. (2004), "Factorial Experiments when Factor Levels Are Not Necessarily Reset," Journal of Quality Technology, 36, 1-11.