Evolutionarily conserved transcriptional co-expression guiding embryonic stem cell differentiation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2008, Pages

  Sun, Yu ^a   Li, Huai ^a   Liu, Ying ^b   Mattson, Mark P ^a   Rao, Mahendra S ^b   Zhan, Ming ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

^b INVITROGEN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVIN; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; GENE PRODUCT; JANUS KINASE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; PAIRED BOX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE 3 PHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN JARID2; PROTEIN KINASE LCK; PROTEIN MYB; PROTEIN MYCN; PROTEIN NASP; PROTEIN ORC1L; PROTEIN PHC1; PROTEIN RUVBL1; SOMATOMEDIN B; STAT PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FOX; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WNT PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL MATURATION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOMICS; GROWTH REGULATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; DNA RESPONSIVE ELEMENT; EVOLUTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; HUMAN; MOUSE;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EVOLUTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; MICE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; RESPONSE ELEMENTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 54849416139     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003406     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Cervera RP, Stojkovic M (2007) Human embryonic stem cell derivation and nuclear transfer: impact on regenerative therapeutics and drug discovery. Clinical Pharmac Therap 82: 310-315.
2. Lerou PH, Daley GQ (2005) Therapeutic potential of embryonic stem cells. Blood Rev 19: 321-331.
3. Sato N, Sanjuan IM, Heke M, Uchida M, Naef F, et al. (2003) Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse. Dev Biol 260: 404.
4. Skottman H, Mikkola M, Lundin K, Olsson C, Stromberg A-M, et al. (2005) Gene expression signatures of seven individual human embryonic stem cell Lines. Stem Cells 23: 1343-1356.
5. Liu Y, Shin S, Zeng X, Zhan M, Gonzalez R, et al. (2006) Genome wide profiling of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), their derivatives and embryonal carcinoma cells to develop base profiles of U.S. Federal government approved hESC lines. BMC Dev Biol 6: 20.
6. Brandenberger R, Wei H, Zhang S, Lei S, Murage J, et al. (2004) Transcriptome characterization elucidates signaling networks that control human ES cell growth and differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 22: 707-716.
7. Abeyta MJ, Clark AT, Rodriguez RT, Bodnar MS, Pera RA, et al. (2004) Unique gene expression signatures of independently-derived human embryonic stem cell lines. Hum Mol Genet 13: 601-608.
8. Ginis I, Luo Y, Miura T, Thies S, Brandenberger R, et al. (2004) Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 269: 360-380.
9. Hong Y, Winkler C, Schartl M (1996) Pluripotency and differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines from the medakafish (Oryzias latipes). Mech Dev 60: 33-44.
10. Soodeen-Karamath S, Gibbins AM (2001) Apparent absence of Oct 3/4 from the chicken genome. Mol Reprod Dev 58: 137-148.
11. Zhan M, Miura T, Xu X, Rao MS (2005) Conservation and variation of gene regulation in embryonic stem cells assessed by comparative genomics. Cell Biochem Biophys 43: 379-405.
12. Sun Y, Li H, Liu Y, Shin S, Mattson MP, et al. (2007) Cross-species transcriptional profiles establish a functional portrait of embryonic stem cells. Genomics 89: 22-35.
13. Rao M (2004) Conserved and divergent paths that regulate self-renewal in mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 275: 269-286.
14. Wei CL, Miura T, Robson P, Lim SK, Xu XQ, et al. (2005) Transcriptome profiling of human and murine ESCs identifies divergent paths required to maintain the stem cell state. Stem Cells 23: 166-185.
15. Zhan M (2008) Genomic studies to explore self-renewal and differentiation properties of embryonic stem cells. Front Biosci 13: 276-283.
16. Li H, Sun Y, Zhan M (2006) The discovery of transcriptional modules by a two-stage matrix decomposition approach. Bioinformatics 23: 473-479.
17. Zhan M (2007) Deciphering modular and dynamic behaviors in transcriptional networks. Genomic Medicine: in press.
18. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5: 101-113.
19. Segal E, Friedman N, Koller D, Regev A (2004) A module map showing conditional activity of expression modules in cancer. Nat Genet 36: 1090-1098.
20. Butte AJ, Tamayo P, Slonim D, Golub TR, Kohane IS (2000) Discovering functional relationships between RNA expression and chemotherapeutic susceptibility using relevance networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 12182-12186.
21. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK (2003) A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 302: 249-255.
22. Li H, Xuan J, Wang Y, Zhan M (2008) Inferring gene regulatory network. Front Biosci 13: 263-275.
23. Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Berman J, Barkai N (2005) Comparative gene expression analysis by differential clustering approach: application to the Candida albicans transcription program. PLoS Genet 1: e39.
24. Oldham MC, Horvath S, Geschwind DH (2006) Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 17973-17978.
25. Sun Y, Li H, Yang H, Rao MS, Zhan M (2006) Mechanisms controlling embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 16: 211-231.
26. Allocco DJ, Kohane IS, Butte AJ (2004) Quantifying the relationship between co-expression, co-regulation and gene function. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 18.
27. Boyer LA, Lee TI, Cole MF, Johnstone SE, Levine SS, et al. (2005) Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122: 947-956.
28. Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL, Vega VB, Zhang W, et al. (2006) The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 38: 431-440.
29. Wasylyk B, Hagman J, Gutierrez-Hartmann A (1998) Ets transcription factors: nuclear effectors of the Ras-MAP-kinase signaling pathway. Trends Bioch Sci 23: 213-216.
30. Molenaar M, van de Wetering M, Oosterwegel M, Peterson-Maduro J, Godsave S, et al. (1996) XTcf-3 transcription factor mediates beta-catenin-induced axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 86: 391-399.
31. Haremaki T, Tanaka Y, Hongo I, Yuge M, Okamoto H (2003) Integration of multiple signal transducing pathways on Fgf response elements of the Xenopus caudal homologue Xcad3. Development 130: 4907-4917.
32. Li H, Zhan M (2006) Systematic intervention of transcription for identifying network response to disease and cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 22: 96-102.
33. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297: 1551-1555.
34. van Noort V, Snel B, Huynen MA (2004) The yeast coexpression network has a small-world, scale-free architecture and can be explained by a simple model. EMBO Rep 5: 280-284.
35. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411: 41-42.
36. Qiu XB, Lin YL, Thome KC, Pian P, Schlegel BP, et al. (1998) An eukaryotic RuvB-like protein (RUVBL1) essential for growth. J Biol Chem 273: 27786-27793.
37. Bauer A, Chauvet S, Huber O, Usseglio F, Rothbacher U, et al. (2000) Pontin52 and reptin52 function as antagonistic regulators of beta-catenin signalling activity. Embo J 19: 6121-6130.
38. Feng Y, Lee N, Fearon ER (2003) TIP49 regulates beta-catenin-mediated neoplastic transformation and T-cell factor target gene induction via effects on chromatin remodeling. Cancer Res 63: 8726-8734.
39. Wood MA, McMahon SB, Cole MD (2000) An ATPase/helicase complex is an essential cofactor for oncogenic transformation by c-Myc. Mol Cell 5: 321-330.
40. Ikura T, Ogryzko VV, Grigoriev M, Groisman R, Wang J, et al. (2000) Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell 102: 463-473.
41. Shen X, Mizuguchi G, Hamiche A, Wu C (2000) A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406: 541-544.
42. Alekseev OM, Widgren EE, Richardson RT, O'Rand MG (2005) Association of NASP with HSP90 in mouse spermatogenic cells: stimulation of ATPase activity and transport of linker histones into nuclei. J Biol Chem 280: 2904-2911.
43. Toyoda M, Kojima M, Takeuchi T (2000) Jumonji is a nuclear protein that participates in the negative regulation of cell growth. Bioch Biophy Res Commun 274: 332-336.
44. Jung J, Mysliwiec MR, Lee Y (2005) Roles of JUMONJI in mouse embryonic development. Develop Dynam 232: 21-32.
45. Giuliano CJ, Kerley-Hamilton JS, Bee T, Freemantle SJ, Manickaratnam R, et al. (2005) Retinoic acid represses a cassette of candidate pluripotency chromosome 12p genes during induced loss of human embryonal carcinoma tumorigenicity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1731: 48-56.
46. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, et al. (2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441: 349-353.
47. Lee TI, Jenner RG, Boyer LA, Guenther MG, Levine SS, et al. (2006) Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125: 301-313.
48. Anneren C, Cowan CA, Melton DA (2004) The Src family of tyrosine kinases is important for embryonic stem cell self-renewal. J Biol Chem 279: 31590-31598.
49. Meyn MA, 3rd, Schreiner SJ, Dumitrescu TP, Nau GJ, Smithgall TE (2005) SRC family kinase activity is required for murine embryonic stem cell growth and differentiation. Mol Pharmacol 68: 1320-1330.
50. Fujimoto A, Mitalipov SM, Kuo HC, Wolf DP (2006) Aberrant genomic imprinting in rhesus monkey embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24: 595-603.
51. Mitalipov S, Clepper L, Sritanaudomchai H, Fujimoto A, Wolf D (2007) Methylation status of imprinting centers for H19/IGF2 and SNURF/SNRPN in primate embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25: 581-588.
52. Battista S, Pentimalli F, Baldassarre G, Fedele M, Fidanza V, et al. (2003) Loss of Hmga1 gene function affects embryonic stem cell lympho-hematopoietic differentiation. Faseb J 17: 1496-1498.
53. Martindill DM, Risebro CA, Smart N, Franco-Viseras M, Rosario CO, et al. (2007) Nucleolar release of Hand1 acts as a molecular switch to determine cell fate. Nat Cell Biol 9: 1131-1141.
54. Hughes M, Dobric N, Scott IC, Su L, Starovic M, et al. (2004) The Hand1, Stra13 and Gcm1 transcription factors override FGF signaling to promote terminal differentiation of trophoblast stem cells. Dev Biol 271: 26-37.
55. Fluckiger AC, Marcy G, Marchand M, Negre D, Cosset FL, et al. (2006) Cell-cycle features of primate embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24: 547-556.
56. White J, Dalton S (2005) Cell cycle control of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 1: 131-138.
57. Stead E, White J, Faast R, Conn S, Goldstone S, et al. (2002) Pluripotent cell division cycles are driven by ectopic Cdk2, cyclin A/E and E2F activities. Oncogene 21: 8320-8333.
58. Burdon T, Smith A, Savatier P (2002) Signalling, cell cycle and pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. Trends Cell Biol 12: 432-438.
59. Bell SP, Dutta A (2002) DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 333-374.
60. Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH (2004) Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med 10: 55-63.
61. Miyabayashi T, Teo JL, Yamamoto M, McMillan M, Nguyen C, et al. (2007) Wnt/beta-catenin/CBP signaling maintains long-term murine embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 5668-5673.
62. Cai L, Ye Z, Zhou BY, Mali P, Zhou C, et al. (2007) Promoting human embryonic stem cell renewal or differentiation by modulating Wnt signal and culture conditions. Cell Res 17: 62-72.
63. Dravid G, Ye Z, Hammond H, Chen G, Pyle A, et al. (2005) Defining the role of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the survival, proliferation, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 23: 1489-1501.
64. Humphrey RK, Beattie GM, Lopez AD, Bucay N, King CC, et al. (2004) Maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells is STAT3 independent. Stem Cells 22: 522-530.
65. Yoshida K, Chambers I, Nichols J, Smith A, Saito M, et al. (1994) Maintenance of the pluripotential phenotype of embryonic stem cells through direct activation of gp130 signalling pathways. Mech Dev 45: 163-171.
66. Paling NR, Wheadon H, Bone HK, Welham MJ (2004) Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem 279: 48063-48070.
67. Takahashi K, Murakami M, Yamanaka S (2005) Role of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Biochem Soc Trans 33: 1522-1525.
68. Ogawa K, Saito A, Matsui H, Suzuki H, Ohtsuka S, et al. (2007) Activin-Nodal signaling is involved in propagation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Journal of Cell Science 120: 55-65.
69. James D, Levine AJ, Besser D, Hemmati-Brivanlou A (2005) TGFbeta/activin/ nodal signaling is necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Development 132: 1273-1282.
70. Vallier L, Alexander M, Pedersen RA (2005) Activin/Nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 118: 4495-4509.
71. Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A (2003) BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115: 281-292.
72. Xu RH, Chen X, Li DS, Li R, Addicks GC, et al. (2002) BMP4 initiates human embryonic stem cell differentiation to trophoblast. Nat Biotechnol 20: 1261-1264.
73. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, et al. (2008) Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451: 141-146.
74. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131: 861-872.
75. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, et al. (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318: 1917-1920.
76. Li H, Liu Y, Shin S, Sun Y, Loring JF, et al. (2006) Transcriptome coexpression map of human embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics 7: 103.
77. Bai Z, Demmel JW (1993) Calculating generalized singular value decomposition. SIAM J Sci Comp 14: 1464-1486.
78. Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D (2003) Generalized singular value decomposition for comparative analysis of genome-scale expression data sets of two different organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3351-3356.
79. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Fitting Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York Wiley.
80. van der Laan MJ (2003) A new partitioning around medoids algorithm. J Stat Comput Sim 73: 575-584.
81. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, et al. (2003) The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113: 631-642.
82. Sharrocks AD (2001) The ETS-domain transcription factor family. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 827-837.
83. van de Wetering M, Cavallo R, Dooijes D, van Beest M, van Es J, et al. (1997) Armadillo coactivates transcription driven by the product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene dTCF. Cell 88: 789-799.