The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 638-650

  Luts, Heleen ^a   Van Dun, Bram ^a   Alaerts, Jane ^a   Wouters, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; RELIABILITY; TIME; AGED; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HEARING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 54049096334     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174f051     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aoyagi, M., Kiren, T., Kim, Y., et al. (1993). Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res, 65, 253-261. (Pubitemid 23054432)
2. Cebulla, M., Sturzebecher, E., & Elberling, C. (2006). Objective detection of auditory steady-state responses: comparison of one-sample and q-sample tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 93-103. (Pubitemid 351324929)
3. Cebulla, M., Sturzebecher, E., & Wernecke, K. D. (2001). Objective detection of the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology, 40, 245-252. (Pubitemid 33026143)
4. Cohen, L. T., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1991). A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 90, 2467-2479.
5. Dimitrijevic, A., John, M. S., van Roon, P., et al. (2002). Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 205-224. (Pubitemid 34692914)
6. Dobie, R. A. & Wilson, M. J. (1996). A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditoryevoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 2236-2246. (Pubitemid 26339992)
7. Herdman, A. T. & Stapells, D. R. (2003). Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol, 42, 237-248. (Pubitemid 37372663)
8. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2001a). Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 555-562.
9. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2002a). Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear, 23, 106-117. (Pubitemid 34280095)
10. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2003). Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 24, 406-423. (Pubitemid 37259588)
11. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., van Roon, P., et al. (2001b). Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 12-27. (Pubitemid 32098417)
12. John, M. S. & Picton, T. W. (2000). MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 61, 125-150.
13. John, M. S., Purcell, D. W., Dimitrijevic, A., et al. (2002b). Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 246-259. (Pubitemid 34918911)
14. Lins, O. G. & Picton, T. W. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420-432.
15. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Boucher, B. L., et al. (1996). Frequencyspecific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 17, 81-96.
16. Luts, H., Desloovere, C., & Wouters, J. (2006). Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and infants. Audiol Neurootol, 11, 24-37. (Pubitemid 43087557)
17. Luts, H. & Wouters, J. (2004). Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: the influence of test duration. Int J Audiol, 43, 471-478. (Pubitemid 39472941)
18. Picton, T. W., Dimitrijevic, A., Perez-Abalo, M. C., et al. (2005). Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 140-156. (Pubitemid 43375742)
19. Picton, T. W. & John, M. S. (2004). Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 541-554.
20. Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., et al. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177-219.
21. Riquelme, R., Kuwada, S., Filipovic, B., et al. (2006). Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates. Ear Hear, 27, 104-119. (Pubitemid 44378654)
22. Small, S. A. & Stapells, D. R. (2004). Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 25, 611-623. (Pubitemid 39602248)
23. Sturzebecher, E., Cebulla, M., & Elberling, C. (2005). Automated auditory response detection: statistical problems with repeated testing. Int J Audiol, 44, 110-117. (Pubitemid 40676031)
24. Sturzebecher, E., Cebulla, M., Elberling, C., et al. (2006). New efficient stimuli for evoking frequency-specific auditory steadystate responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 448-461. (Pubitemid 44515236)
25. Sturzebecher, E., Cebulla, M., & Pschirrer, U. (2001). Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology, 40, 63-68. (Pubitemid 32586206)
26. van der Reijden, C. S., Mens, L. H., & Snik, A. F. (2004). Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 692-701.
27. Van Dun, B., Wouters, J., & Moonen, M. (2007). Improving auditory steady-state response detection using independent component analysis on multi-channel EEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 54, 1220-1230. (Pubitemid 46956961)