Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 104-119

  Riquelme, Raquel ^a   Kuwada, Shigeyuki ^b   Filipovic, Blagoje ^b   Hartung, Klaus ^c   Leonard, Gerald ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES BIOMÉDICAS ALBERTO SOLS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^c Bose Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION FOLLOWING RESPONSE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BAND PASS NOISE; CLICK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EAR PHONE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NOISE; SCREENING TEST; SOUND INTENSITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; UNITED STATES; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SOUND DETECTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; MALE; REACTION TIME; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 33746508959     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000201857.99240.24     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aoyagi, M., Kiren, T., Kim, Y., Suzuki, Y, Fuse, T, & Koike, Y. (1993). Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hearing Research, 65, 253-261.
2. Aoyagi, M., Kiren, T., Furuse, H., Fuse, T., Suzuki, Y., Yokota, M., & Koike, Y. (1994). Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Oto-laryngologica Supplementum, 511, 15-22.
3. Aoyagi, M., Suzuki, Y., Yokota, M., Furuse, H, Watanabe, T, & Ito, T. (1999). Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 4, 28-37.
4. Batra, R., Kuwada, S., & Maher, V. L. (1986). The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans. Hearing Research, 21, 167-177.
5. Bernstein, L. R., & Trahiotis, C. (2002). Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1026-1036.
6. Chung, B. J., Buss, E., Hall, J. W. 3rd, & Grose, J. H. (2003). The effect of temporal stimulus characteristics in maintenance of the acoustic reflex. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4, 41-48.
7. Cohen, L. T., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1991). A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2467-2479.
8. Cone-Wesson, B., Dowell, R. C., Tomlin, D., Rance, G., & Ming, W. J. (2002). The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 173-187.
9. Cone-Wesson, B., Parker, J., Swiderski, N., & Rickards, F. (2002). The auditory steady-state response: full-term and premature neonates. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 260-269.
10. Dobie, R. A., & Wilson, M. J. (1989). Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear and Hearing, 10, 2-13.
11. Gennosa, T. J. (1991). Estimating Human Hearing Threshold with the Amplitude Modulation Following Response (AMFR): An Investigation of its Properties. Masters thesis, Biomedical Engineering, The Hartford Graduate Center. Hartford CT.
12. Griffin, S. J., Bernstein, L. R., Ingham, N. J., & McAlpine, D. (2005). Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 3463-3478.
13. Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387, 167-178.
14. John, M. S., Brown, D. K., Muir, P. J, & Picton, T. W. (2004). Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear and Hearing, 25, 539-553.
15. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2002). Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear and Hearing, 23, 106-117.
16. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2003). Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 24, 406-423.
17. Kuwada, S., Anderson, J. S., Batra, R., Fitzpatrick, D. C., Teissier, N. & D'Angelo, W. R. (2002). Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 188-204.
18. Kuwada, S., Batra, R., & Maher, V. L. (1986). Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hearing Research, 21, 179-192.
19. Levi, E. C., Folsom, R. C., & Dobie, R. A. (1993). Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hearing Research, 68, 42-52.
20. Lins, O. G., Picton, P. E., Picton, T. W., Champagne, S. C., & Durieux-Smith, A. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3051-3063.
21. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Boucher, B. L., Durieux-Smith, A., Champagne, S. C., Moran, L. M., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Martin, V., & Savio, G. (1996). Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 17, 81-96.
22. Luts, H., Desloovere, C., Kumar, A., Vandermeersch, E., & Wouters, J. (2004). Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68, 915-926.
23. Mardia, K. (1972). Statistics of directional data. New York: Academic Press.
24. Pethe, J., Muhler, R., & von Specht, H. (2002). Amplitude modulation following responses in audiological diagnostics. HNO, 50, 1045-1052.
25. Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Purcell, D. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 177-219.
26. Picton, T. W., Vajsar, J., Rodriguez, R., & Campbell, K. B. (1987). Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 68, 119-131.
27. Rance, G., Rickards, F. W., Cohen, L. T., De Vidi, S., & Clark, G. M. (1995). The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hearing, 16, 499-507.
28. Rees, A., Green, G. G., & Kay, R. H. (1986). Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hearing Research, 23, 123-133.
29. Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1984). Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. In: Evoked Potentials II (R. H. Nodar, C. Barber, ed), pp 163-168. Boston: Butterworth.
30. Rickards, F. W., Tan, L. E., Cohen, L. T., Wilson, O. J., Drew, J. H., & Clark, G. M. (1994). Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. British Journal of Audiology, 28, 327-337.
31. Stapells, D. R., Galambos, R., Costello, J. A., & Makeig, S. (1988). Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 71, 289-295.
32. van de Par, S., & Kohlrausch, A. (1997). A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1671-1680.