Automated auditory response detection: Statistical problems with repeated testing

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 110-117

  Stürzebecher, Ekkehard ^a,c   Cebulla, Mario ^a   Elberling, Claus ^b  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b OTICON A S   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated response detection; Bonferroni correction; Dependent samples; Repeated testing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUTOMATION; DATA ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DATA COLLECTION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 18744403443     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020400029228     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aoyagi, M., Suzuki, Y., Yokota, M., Furuse, H., Watanabe, T. & Ito, T. 1999. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol, 4, 28-37.
2. Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E. & Wernecke, K.D. 2000. Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials. Scand Audiol, 29, 44-51.
3. Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E. & Wernecke, K.D. 2001. Objective detection of the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology, 40, 245-252.
4. Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E., Berger, E.R., Shehata-Dieler, W. & Neumann, K. 2003. A new, rapid ABR screening algorithm based on click-evoked ASSR. XVIII IERASG Biennial Symposium, Puerto de la Cruz, Teneriffa.
5. Champlin, C.A. 1992. Methods for detecting auditory steady-state potentials recorded from humans. Hear Res, 58, 63-69.
6. Dimitrijevic, A., John, M.S., Van Roon, P., Purcell, D.W., Adamonis, J., et al. 2002. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 205-224.
7. Dobie, R.A. & Wilson, M.J. 1993. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 88, 516-524.
8. Don, M. & Elberling, C. 1996. Use of quantitative measures of auditory brain-stem response peak amplitude and residual back ground noise in the decision to stop averaging. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 491-499.
9. Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Hochberg, Y. & Tamhane, A.C. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley and Sons.
11. Howell, D.C. 1987. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.
12. John, M.S. & Picton, T.W. 2000. MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 61, 125-150.
13. Lins, G.L. & Picton, T.W. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420-432.
14. Lütkenhöner, B. 1991. Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), Suppl 491, 52-60.
15. Moore, B.R. 1980. A modification of the Rayleigh test for vector data. Biometrika, 67, 175-180.
16. Picton, T.W., John, M.S. & Dimitrijevic, A. 2002. Possible roles for the auditory steady-state responses in identification, evaluation and management of hearing loss in infancy. Audiology Today, 14, 29-34.
17. Picton, T.W., John, M.S., Dimitrijevic, A. & Purcell, D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177-219.
18. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T. 1986. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ranee, G. & Rickards, F. 2002. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 236-245.
20. Stürzebecher, E., Cebulla, M. & Wernecke, K.D. 1999. Objective response detection in the frequency domain-Comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiology & Neurootology, 4, 2-11.
21. Stürzebecher, E. 2001. Method for Hearing Screening of Newborn by Means of Steady-State Responses Evoked with High Click Rate. Patent Application 01610060.4 at the European Patent Office.
22. Stürzebecher, E., Cebulla, M. & Neumann, K. 2003. Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening. Int J Audiol, 42, 59-70.
23. Valdes, J.L., Perez-Abalo, M.C., Martin, V., Savio, G., Sierra, C., et al. 1997. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear, 18, 420-429.