Improving auditory steady-state response detection using independent component analysis on multichannel EEG data

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1220-1230

  Van Dun, Bram ^a   Wouters, Jan ^a   Moonen, Marc ^b  

^a KU LEUVEN UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Auditory steady state response; Electroencephalogram; Independent component analysis; Multichannel

Indexed keywords

AUDIOMETERS; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; CHANNEL CAPACITY; DATA RECORDING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

COMPONENT ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HEARING; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEADY STATE;

ALGORITHMS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34250764128     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.897327     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, "1994 position statement," Pediatrics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 152-156, 1995.
2. H. Luts and J. Wouters, "Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: The influence of test duration," Int. J. Audiol., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 471-478, 2004.
3. H. Luts, C. Desloovere, and J. Wouters, "Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children," Audiol. Neuro-Otol., vol. 11, pp. 24-37, 2006.
4. D. Regan, Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1989.
5. M. Aoyagi, T. Kiren, Y. Kim, Y. Suzuki, T. Fuse, and Y. Koike, "Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep," Hear. Res., vol. 65, pp. 253-261, 1993.
6. M. Aoyagi, T. Kiren, H. Furuse, T. Fuse, Y. Suzuki, and M. Yokoto, "Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response," Acta Otolaryngol., vol. suppl 511, pp. 7-14, 1994.
7. L. T. Cohen, F. W. Rickards, and G. M. Clark, "A comparison of steady state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 90, pp. 2467-2479, 1991.
8. G. Rance, F. W. Rickards, L. T. Cohen, S. De Vidi, and G. M. Clark, "The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials," Ear Hear., vol. 16, pp. 499-507, 1995.
9. F. W. Rickards, L. E. Tan, L. T. Cohen, O. J. Wilson, J. H. Drew, and G. M. Clark, "Auditory steady state evoked potentials in newborns," Br. J. Audiol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 327-337, 1994.
10. O. G. Lins, P. E. Picton, T. W. Picton, S. C. Champagne, and A. Durieux-Smith, "Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 97, pp. 3051-3063, 1995.
11. O. G. Lins and T. W. Picton, "Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 96, pp. 420-432, 1995.
12. M. S. John, A. Dimitrijevic, P. Van Roon, and T. W. Picton, "Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters," Audiology, vol. 37, pp. 59-82, 1998.
13. M. S. John, D. W. Purcell, A. Dimitrijevic, and T. W. Picton, "Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 13, pp. 246-259, 2002.
14. R. A. Dobie and M. J. Wilson, "A comparison of t test, f test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 100, no. 4, pt. 1, pp. 2236-2246, 1996.
15. J. L. Valdes, M. C. Perez-Abalo, V. Martin, G. Savio, C. Sierra, E. Rodriguez, and O. Lins, "Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses," Ear Hear., vol. 18, pp. 420-429, 1997.
16. T. W. Picton, A. Dimitrijevic, M. S. John, and P. Van Roon, "The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state responses," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 112, pp. 1698-1711, 2001.
17. M. S. John, A. Dimitrijevic, and T. W. Picton, "Weighted averaging of steady state responses," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 122, pp. 555-562, 2001.
18. M. S. John, A. Dimitrijevic, and T. W. Picton, "Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes," Ear Hear., vol. 23, pp. 106-117, 2002.
19. M. S. John, D. K. Brown, P. J. Muir, and T. W. Picton, "Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants," Ear Hear., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 539-553, 2004.
20. E. Stürzebecher, M. Cebulla, and U. Pschirrer, "Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response," Audiology, vol. 40, pp. 63-68, 2001.
21. R. Mühler, F. von Dobeneck, M. Ziese, and H. von Specht, "Recording of multiple frequency ASSR with adaptive stimuli," in The 19th International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group (IERASG) Biennial Symposium, Havana, Cuba, 2005.
22. C. S. van der Reijden, L. H. M. Mens, and A. F. M. Snik, "EEG derivations providing auditory steady-state responses with high signal-to-noise ratios in infants," Ear Hear., vol. 26, pp. 299-309, 2005.
23. C. S. van der Reijden, L. H. M. Mens, and A. F. M. Snik, "Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults," J. Am. Ac. Audiol., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 692-701, 2004.
24. Y. Tang and A. M. Norcia, "An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 96, pp. 268-277, 1995.
25. A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja, Independent Component Analysis. New York: Wiley, 2001.
26. S. Bounkong, B. Toch, D. Saad, and D. Lowe, "ICA for watermarking digital images," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 4, pp. 1471-1498, 2003.
27. H. Fang and H. De-Shuang, "Extracting mode components in laser intensity distribution by independent component analysis," Appl. Opt., vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 3646-3653, 2005.
28. L. De Lathauwer, B. De Moor, and J. Vandewalle, "Fetal electrocardiogram extraction by blind source subspace separation," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 567-572, May 2000.
29. A. D. Back and A. S. Weigend, "A first application of independent component analysis to extracting structure from stock returns," Int. J. Neural Syst., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 473-484, 1997.
30. M. S. John and T. W. Picton, "MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses," Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed., vol. 61, pp. 125-150, 2000.
31. J. Malmivuo and R. Plonsey, Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.
32. P. Comon, "Independent component analysis, a new concept?," Signal Process., vol. 36, pp. 287-314, 1994.
33. H. F. Trotter, "An elementary proof of the central limit theorem," Arch. Math., vol. 10, pp. 226-234, 1959.
34. J. Cardoso and A. Soloumiac, "Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals," Inst. Electr. Eng. Proc.-F, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 362-370, 1993.
35. A. Hyvärinen, "Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 626-634, May 1999.
36. H. Stögbauer, A. Kraskov, S. A. Astakhov, and P. Grassberger, "Least-dependent-component analysis based on mutual information," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 70, pp. 066 123/1-066 123/17, 2004.
37. K. H. Knuth, "A Bayesian approach to source separation," in Proc. ICA '99, Aussois, France, 1999, pp. 283-288.
38. P. Comon, "Blind identification and source separation in 2 x 3 under-determined mixtures," IEEE Trans. Signal Process, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 11-22, Jan. 2004.
39. Y. Deville, M. Benali, and F. Abrard, "Differential source separation for underdetermined instantaneous or convolutive mixtures: Concept and algorithms," Signal Process., vol. 84, pp. 1759-1776, 2004.
40. T. W. Picton, M. S. John, A. Dimitrijevic, and D. Purcell, "Human auditory steady-state responses," Int. J. Audiol., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 177-219, 2003.
41. J. A. Hanley and B. J. McNeil, "The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve," Radiology, vol. 143, pp. 29-36, 1982.
42. D. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
43. J. A. Hanley and B. J. McNeil, "A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases," Radiology, vol. 148, pp. 839-843, 1983.
44. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, "Multiple significant tests: The Bonferroni method," Br. Med. J., vol. 310, p. 170, 1995.
45. E. Stürzebecher, M. Cebulla, and C. Elberling, "Automated auditory response detection: Statistical problems with repeated testing," Int. J. Audiol., vol. 44, pp. 110-117, 2005.
46. T.-P. Jung, S. Makeig, C. Humphries, T.-W. Lee, M. J. McKeown, V. Iragui, and T. J. Sejnowski, Removing Electroencephalographic Artifacts by Blind Source Separation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, , vol. 37, pp. 163-178, 2000.