Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 81-96

  Lins, Otavio G ^a,d   Picton, Terence W ^a   Boucher, Brigitte L ^a   Durieux Smith, Andreé ^b   Champagne, Sandra C ^b   Moran, Linda M ^b   Perez Abalo, Maria C ^c   Martin, Vivian ^c   Savio, Guillermo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c CUBAN NEUROSCIENCE CENTER   (Cuba)

^d ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BONE CONDUCTION; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BONE CONDUCTION; HEARING; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; INFANT;

EID: 0029932718     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199604000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1969). S3.6: Specifications for audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute.
2. American National Standards Institute. (1991). S3.1: Maximum permissible ambient noise for audiometric testing. New York: American National Standards Institute.
3. American National Standards Institute. (1992). S3.43: Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone bone-conduction audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute.
4. Aoyagi, M., Kiren, T., Furuse, H., Fuse, T., Suzuki, Y., Yokota, S., & Koike, Y. (1994). Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), Supplement, 511, 7-14.
5. Aoyagi, M, Yamazaki, Y., Yokata, M., Fuse, T., Suzuki, Y., Itoh, S., & Watanabe, T. (in press). Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), Supplement.
6. Aoyagi, M., Yoshinori, K., Suzuki, Y., Fuse, T., & Koike, Y. (1993). Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hearing Research, 65, 253-261.
7. Carballo-Gonzalez, J. A., Valdez-Sosa, P., & Valdez-Sosa, M. (1989). Detection of event related potentials. International Journal of Neuroscience, 46, 109-122.
8. Chambers, R. D., Feth, L. L., & Burns, E. M. (1986). The relation between the human frequency-following response and the low pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 80, 1673-1680.
9. Cohen, L. T., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1991). A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 90, 2467-2479.
10. Davidson, J., Hyde, M. L., & Alberti, P. W. (1989). Epidemiologic patterns in childhood hearing loss: a review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 17, 239-266.
11. Dirks, D. (1973). Bone-conduction measurements. In J. Jerger (Ed.), Modern developments in audiology (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-36). New York: Academic Press.
12. Dobie, R. A., & Wilson, M. J. (1994). Phase weighting: a method to improve objective detection of steady-state evoked potentials. Hearing Research, 79, 94-98.
13. Dobie, R. A., & Wilson, M. J. (in press). Some objective methods of detecting steady-state auditory evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America.
14. Dolphin, W. F., Chertoff, M. E., & Burkard, R. (1994). Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 96, 2225-2234.
15. Durieux-Smith, A., Picton, T. W., Bernard, P., MacMurray, B., & Goodman, J. T. (1991). Prognostic validity of brainstem electric-response audiometry (BERA) in infants of a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Audiology, 30, 249-265.
16. Galambos, R., & Wilson, M. (1994). Newborn hearing thresholds measured by both insert and earphone methods. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 5, 141-145.
17. Galambos, R., Wilson, M. J., & Silva, D. P. (1994). Identifying hearing loss in the intensive care nursery: a twenty year summary. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 5, 151-162.
18. Hawkins, J. E., & Stevens, S. S. (1950). The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 22, 6-13.
19. Hosford-Dunn H., Runge C. A., Hillel, A., & Johnson, S. J. (1983). Auditory brainstem responses testing in infants with collapsed ear canals. Hearing Research, 4, 258-260.
20. Hyde, M. L., Matsumoto, N., & Alberti, P. W. (1987). The normative basis for click and frequency-specific BERA in high-risk infants. Acta Otolaryngologica, 103, 602-611.
21. Kemp, D. T., Ryan, S., & Bray, P. (1990). A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 11, 93-105.
22. Kuwada, S., Batra, R., & Maher, V. L. (1986). Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hearing Research, 21, 179-192.
23. Lins, O. G., & Picton, T. W. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 420-432.
24. Lins O. G., Picton, P. P., Picton, T. W., Champagne, S. C., & Durieux-Smith, A. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80 to 110 Hz. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 97, 3051-3063.
25. Mauk, G. W., White, K. R., Mortensen, L. B., & Behrens, T. R. (1991). The effectiveness of screening programs based on high-risk characteristics in the early identification of hearing impairment. Ear and Hearing, 5, 312-319.
26. National Institutes of Health (1993). Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement Mar 1-3 1993, 11(1), 1-24.
27. Olsho, L. W., Koch, E. G., Carter, E. A., Halpin, C. F., & Spetner, N. B. (1988). Pure-tone sensitivity of human infants. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 84, 1316-1324.
28. Picton T. W., Durieux-Smith A., & Moran, L. M. (1994). Recording auditory brainstem responses from infants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 28, 93-110.
29. Picton, T. W., Skinner, C. R., Champagne, S. C., Kellett, A. J. C., & Maiste, A. C. (1987). Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 82, 165-178.
30. Picton, T. W., Vajsar, J., Rodriguez, R., & Campbell, K. B. (1988). Reliability estimates for steady state evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 68 119-131
31. Ranee, G., Rickards, F. W., Cohen, L. T., De Vidi, S., & Clark, G. M. (1995). The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hearing, 16, 499-507.
32. Regan, D., & Cartwright, R. F. (1970). A method of measuring the potentials evoked by simultaneous stimulation of different retinal regions, Electroencephalophy and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 314-319.
33. Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1984). Steady state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. In R. H. Nodar & C. Barber (Eds.) Evoked potentials II, (pp. 163-168). Boston: Butterworth.
34. Rickards, F. W., Tan, L. E., Cohen, L. T., Wilson, O. J., Drew, J. H., & Clark, G. M. (1994). Auditory steady-state evoked potentials in newborns. British Journal of Audiology, 28, 327-337.
35. Schneider, B. A., & Trehub, S. E. (1992). Sources of developmental change in auditory sensitivity. In L. A. Werners & E. W. Rubel (Eds.) Developmental psychoacoustics. (pp 3-46). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Stapells, D. R, Gravel, S. G., & Martin, B. A. (1995). Thresholds for auditory brainstem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 16, 361-371.
37. Starr, A., & Don, M. (1988). Brain potentials evoked by acoustic stimuli. In T.W. Picton (Ed.) Human event-related potentials. Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology (rev. ser., Vol. 3) (pp. 97-157). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Stein, L. K., Jabaley, T., Spitz, R., Stoakley, D., & McGee, T. (1990). The hearing-impaired infant: patterns of identification and habilitation revisited. Ear and Hearing, 11, 201-205.
39. Valdez-Sosa, M. J., Bobes, M. A., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Perera, M., Carballo, J. A., & Valdez-Sosa, P. (1987). Comparison of auditory evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory. Audiology, 26, 166-178.
40. Victor, J. D., & Mast, J. (1991). A new statistic for steady state evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 378-388.
41. Wei, W. W. S. (1990). Estimation of the spectrum. In Time series analysis: Univariate and multivariate methods (pp. 256-287). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
42. Werner, L. A., Folsom, R. C., & Mancl, L. R. (1993). The relationship between auditory brainstem response and behavioral thresholds in normal hearing infants and adults. Hearing Research, 68, 131-141.
43. White, K. R., & Behrens, T. R. (1993). The Rhode Island hearing assessment project: Implications for universal newborn hearing screening. Seminars in Hearing, 14, 1-119.
44. Zurek, P. M. (1992). Detectability of transient and sinusoidal otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 13, 307-310.
45. Zwislocki, J., Kruger, B., Miller, J. D., Niemoller, A. F., Shaw, E. A., & Studebaker, G. (1988). Earphones in audiometry. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 83, 1688-1689.