Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 692-701

  van der Reijden, Christoph S ^a   Mens, Lucas H M ^a   Snik, Ad F M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Amplitude modulation following response; Auditory steady state response; EEG; EEG derivation; Electrode position; Objective audiometry; Signal to noise ratio; Steady state evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ARTIFACTS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE;

EID: 15544370672     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.10.4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y, Suzuki Y, Fuse T, Koike Y. (1993) Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 65:253-261.
2. Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Yokota M, Furuse H, Watanabe T, Ito T. (1999) Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol 4:28-37.
3. Aoyagi M, Yamazaki Y, Yokota M, Fuse T, Suzuki Y, Itoh S, Watanabe T. (1996) Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 522:6-10.
4. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Pschirrer U. (2000) Registrierung der AMFR - Einfluss von Elektrodenposition und Modulationsfrequenz. [Recording the Amplitude Modulation Following Response - influence of electrode position and modulation frequency.] Z Audiol 39:78-85.
5. Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM. (1991) A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2467-2479.
6. Cuffin BN. (1993) Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40:42-48
7. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ. (1996) A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinuoids. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2236-2246.
8. Herdman AT, Stapells DR. (2001) Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 30:41-49.
9. John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Van Roon P, Picton TW. (2001) Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 6:12-27.
10. John MS, Lins OG, Boucher, Picton TW. (1998) Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 37:59-82.
11. John MS, Picton TW. (2000) MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 61:125-150.
12. Levi EC, Folsom RC, Dobie RA. (1993) Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hear Res 68:42-52.
13. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, Moran LM, Perez-Abalo MC, Martin V, Savio G. (1996) Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1796:81-96.
14. Lins OG, Picton PE, Picton TW. (1995) Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3051-3063.
15. Mens LHM, Van der Reijden CS, Wouters J, Gelders E, Snik A. (2001) The amplitude modulation following response: Results with the MASTER system using six different EEG derivations. Abstract. In: 2nd International Symposium and Workshop on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implantation. Lyon, France, 67.
16. Näätänen R, Picton TW. (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375-425.
17. Pantev C, Roberts LE, Elbert T, Roß B, Wienbruch C. (1996). Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 101:62-74.
18. Perez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A, Martín V, Rodríguez E, Galán L. (2001) Steady-state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 22:200-211.
19. Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D. (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 42:177-219.
20. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. (1994) Confidence limits by Monte Carlo simulation. In: Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, eds. Numerical Recipes in Pascal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 582-584.
21. Rance G, Beer DE, Cone-Wesson B, Shepherd RK, Dowell RC, King AM, Rickards FW, Clark GM. (1999) Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 20: 238-252.
22. Rance G, Rickards FW, Cohen LT, De Vidi S, Clark GM. (1995) The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 16:499-507
23. Rees A, Green GGR, Kay RH. (1986) Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res 23:123-133.
24. Rice JA. (1995) Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 72-73.
25. Rickards FW, Tan LE, Cohen LT, Wilson OJ, Drew JH, Clark GM. (1994) Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol 28:327-337.
26. Valdez JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Martin V, Savio G, Sierra C, Rodriguez E, Lins O. (1997) Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 18:420-429.
27. van der Reijden CS, Mens LHM, Snik AFM. (2001) Comparing signal-to-noise ratios of amplitude modulation following responses from four EEG derivations.