Predicting quantitative genetic interactions by means of sequential matrix approximation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Järvinen, Aki P ^a   Hiissa, Jukka ^a   Elo, Laura L ^a,b   Aittokallio, Tero ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b TURKU CENTRE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUTANT; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; SCREENING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; FUNGAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 53749091787     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003284     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boone C, Bussey H, Andrews BJ (2007) Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat Rev Genet 8: 437-449.
2. Badano JL, Katsanis N (2002) Beyond Mendel: an evolving view of human genetic disease transmission. Nat Rev Genet 3: 779-789.
3. Lehner B (2007) Modelling genotype-phenotype relationships and human disease with genetic interaction networks. J Exp Biol 210: 1559-1566.
4. Ooi SL, Pan X, Peyser BD, Ye P, Meluh PB, Yuan DS, Irizarry RA, Bader JS, Spencer FA, Boeke JD (2006) Global synthetic-lethality analysis and yeast functional profiling. Trends Genet 22: 56-63.
5. Hartman JL, Garvik B, Hartwell L (2001) Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291: 1001-1004.
6. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
7. Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Thompson NJ, Denic V, Bhamidipati A, et al. (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123: 507-519.
8. Decourty L, Saveanu C, Zemam K, Hantraye F, Frachon E, et al. (2008) Linking functionally related genes by sensitive and quantitative characterization of genetic interaction profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 5821-5826.
9. Segrè D, Deluna A, Church GM, Kishony R (2005) Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet 37: 77-83.
10. St Onge RP, Mani R, Oh J, Proctor M, Fung E, et al. (2007) Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet 39: 199-206.
11. Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, Roguev A, Fillingham J, et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446: 806-810.
12. Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Krogan NJ, Weissman JS (2006) A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol 7: R63.
13. Pan X, Yuan DS, Ooi SL, Wang X, Sookhai-Mahadeo S, et al. (2006) dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 41: 206-221.
14. Mani R, St Onge RP, Hartman JL, Giaever G, Roth FP (2008) Defining genetic interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 3461-3466.
15. Axler S (1997) Linear Algebra Done Right. Second Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. De Leeuw J (2006) A Decomposition Method for Weighted Least Squares Low-rank Approximation of Symmetric Matrices. Department of Statistics Papers, Paper 2006041602. Available: http://repositories.cdlib.org/ uclastat/papers/2006041602. Accessed: December 2007.
17. Pudil P, Novoviçová J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Lett 15: 1119-1125.
18. Drees BL, Thorsson V, Carter GW, Rives AW, Raymond MZ, et al. (2005) Derivation of genetic interaction networks from quantitative phenotype data. Genome Biol 6: R38.
19. Wong SL, Zhang LV, Tong AH, Li Z, Goldberg DS, et al. (2004) Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 15682-15687.
20. Beyer A, Bandyopadhyay S, Ideker T (2007) Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks. Nat Rev Genet 8: 699-710.
21. Bader GD, Hogue CW (2003) An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 2.
22. Taylor RJ, Siegel AF, Galitski T (2007) Network motif analysis of a multi-mode genetic-interaction network. Genome Biol 8: R160.
23. Hintze A, Adami C (2008) Evolution of complex modular biological networks. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e23.
24. Bandyopadhyay S, Kelley R, Krogan NJ, Ideker T (2008) Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000065.
25. Kelley R, Ideker T (2005) Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat Biotechnol 23: 561-566.
26. Ulitsky I, Shamir R (2007) Pathway redundancy and protein essentiality revealed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction networks. Mol Syst Biol 3: 104.
27. Ulitsky I, Shlomi T, Kupiec M, Shamir R (2008) From E-MAPs to module maps: dissecting quantitative genetic interactions using physical interactions. Mol Syst Biol 4: 209.
28. Dror O, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ, Sharan R (2008) Structural similarity of genetically interacting proteins. BMC Syst Biol 2: 69.
29. Ye P, Peyser BD, Pan X, Boeke JD, Spencer FA, Bader JS (2005) Gene function prediction from congruent synthetic lethal interactions in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 1: 26.
30. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837-845.