Solution Structure and Characterization of the DNA-Binding Activity of the B3BP-Smr Domain

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 383, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1156-1170

  Diercks, Tammo ^a   AB, Eiso ^a   Daniels, Mark A ^a   de Jong, Rob N ^a   Besseling, Rogier ^a   Kaptein, Robert ^a   Folkers, Gert E ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

DNA repair; DNA binding domain; DNase I; IF3C fold; NMR

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; ENDONUCLEASE; PROTEIN MUTS; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; SMALL MUTS RELATED; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; DNA BINDING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EUKARYOTE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 53549103560     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Moreira D., and Philippe H. Smr: a bacterial and eukaryotic homologue of the C-terminal region of the MutS2 family. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24 (1999) 298-300
2. Eisen J.A. A phylogenomic study of the MutS family of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 26 (1998) 4291-4300
3. Joshi A., and Rao B.J. MutS recognition: multiple mismatches and sequence context effects. J. Biosci. 26 (2001) 595-606
4. Malik H.S., and Henikoff S. Dual recognition-incision enzymes might be involved in mismatch repair and meiosis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25 (2000) 414-418
5. Fukui K., Masui R., and Kuramitsu S. Thermus thermophilus MutS2, a MutS paralogue, possesses an endonuclease activity promoted by MutL. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 135 (2004) 375-384
6. Pinto A.V., Mathieu A., Marsin S., Veaute X., Ielpi L., Labigne A., and Radicella J.P. Suppression of homologous and homeologous recombination by the bacterial MutS2 protein. Mol. Cell 17 (2005) 113-120
7. Kang J., Huang S., and Blaser M.J. Structural and functional divergence of MutS2 from bacterial MutS1 and eukaryotic MSH4-MSH5 homologs. J. Bacteriol. 187 (2005) 3528-3537
8. Finn R.D., Mistry J., Schuster-Bockler B., Griffiths-Jones S., Hollich V., Lassmann T., et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) D247-D251
9. Lamers M.H., Perrakis A., Enzlin J.H., Winterwerp H.H., de Wind N., and Sixma T.K. The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a GxT mismatch. Nature 407 (2000) 711-717
10. Obmolova G., Ban C., Hsieh P., and Yang W. Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA. Nature 407 (2000) 703-710
11. Watanabe N., Wachi S., and Fujita T. Identification and characterization of BCL-3-binding protein: implications for transcription and DNA repair or recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 26102-26110
12. Fukui K., Kosaka H., Kuramitsu S., and Masui R. Nuclease activity of the MutS homologue MutS2 from Thermus thermophilus is confined to the Smr domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) 850-860
13. Murillas R., Simms K.S., Hatakeyama S., Weissman A.M., and Kuehn M.R. Identification of developmentally expressed proteins that functionally interact with Nedd4 ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 2897-2907
14. Zheng M.Z., Qin H.D., Yu X.J., Zhang R.H., Chen L.Z., Feng Q.S., and Zeng Y.X. Haplotype of gene Nedd4 binding protein 2 associated with sporadic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the Southern Chinese population. J. Transl. Med. 5 (2007) 36
15. Chen C., and Matesic L.E. The Nedd4-like family of E3 ubiquitin ligases and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26 (2007) 587-604
16. Robinson H.M., Taylor K.E., Jalali G.R., Cheung K.L., Harrison C.J., and Moorman A.V. t(14;19)(q32;q13): a recurrent translocation in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 39 (2004) 88-92
17. Ericsson U.B., Hallberg B.M., Detitta G.T., Dekker N., and Nordlund P. Thermofluor-based high-throughput stability optimization of proteins for structural studies. Anal. Biochem. 357 (2006) 289-298
18. Landau M., Mayrose I., Rosenberg Y., Glaser F., Martz E., Pupko T., and Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) W299-W302
19. Baker N.A., Sept D., Joseph S., Holst M.J., and McCammon J.A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 10037-10041
20. Letunic I., Copley R.R., Pils B., Pinkert S., Schultz J., and Bork P. SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) D257-D260
21. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., and Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (1994) 4673-4680
22. Cuff J.A., Clamp M.E., Siddiqui A.S., Finlay M., and Barton G.J. JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 892-893
23. Arnold K., Bordoli L., Kopp J., and Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 195-201
24. Holm L., and Sander C. The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 24 (1996) 206-209
25. Andreeva A., Howorth D., Chandonia J.M., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T.J., Chothia C., and Murzin A.G. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (2008) D419-D425
26. Greene L.H., Lewis T.E., Addou S., Cuff A., Dallman T., Dibley M., et al. The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) D291-D297
27. Biou V., Shu F., and Ramakrishnan V. X-ray crystallography shows that translational initiation factor IF3 consists of two compact alpha/beta domains linked by an alpha-helix. EMBO J. 14 (1995) 4056-4064
28. Sette M., Spurio R., van Tilborg P., Gualerzi C.O., and Boelens R. Identification of the ribosome binding sites of translation initiation factor IF3 by multidimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. RNA 5 (1999) 82-92
29. Katoh E., Hatta T., Shindo H., Ishii Y., Yamada H., Mizuno T., and Yamazaki T. High precision NMR structure of YhhP, a novel Escherichia coli protein implicated in cell division. J. Mol. Biol. 304 (2000) 219-229
30. Davies C., Ramakrishnan V., and White S.W. Structural evidence for specific S8-RNA and S8-protein interactions within the 30S ribosomal subunit: ribosomal protein S8 from Bacillus stearothermophilus at 1.9 A resolution. Structure 4 (1996) 1093-1104
31. Merianos H.J., Wang J., and Moore P.B. The structure of a ribosomal protein S8/spc operon mRNA complex. RNA 10 (2004) 954-964
32. Tishchenko S., Nikulin A., Fomenkova N., Nevskaya N., Nikonov O., Dumas P., et al. Detailed analysis of RNA-protein interactions within the ribosomal protein S8-rRNA complex from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii. J. Mol. Biol. 311 (2001) 311-324
33. Ostheimer G.J., Barkan A., and Matthews B.W. Crystal structure of E. coli YhbY: a representative of a novel class of RNA binding proteins. Structure 10 (2002) 1593-1601
34. Liepinsh E., Leonchiks A., Sharipo A., Guignard L., and Otting G. Solution structure of the R3H domain from human Smubp-2. J. Mol. Biol. 326 (2003) 217-223
35. Grishin N.V. The R3H motif: a domain that binds single-stranded nucleic acids. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23 (1998) 329-330
36. Lahm A., and Suck D. DNase I-induced DNA conformation. 2 A structure of a DNase I-octamer complex. J. Mol. Biol. 222 (1991) 645-667
37. Oefner C., and Suck D. Crystallographic refinement and structure of DNase I at 2 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 192 (1986) 605-632
38. Maru Y., Afar D.E., Witte O.N., and Shibuya M. The dimerization property of glutathione S-transferase partially reactivates Bcr-Abl lacking the oligomerization domain. J. Biol. Chem. 271 (1996) 15353-15357
39. Wardleworth B.N., Russell R.J., Bell S.D., Taylor G.L., and White M.F. Structure of Alba: an archaeal chromatin protein modulated by acetylation. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 4654-4662
40. 2 complex at 2.3 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 226 (1992) 1237-1256
41. Folkers G.E., van Buuren B.N., and Kaptein R. Expression screening, protein purification and NMR analysis of human protein domains for structural genomics. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 5 (2004) 119-131
42. de Jong R.N., Daniels M.A., Kaptein R., and Folkers G.E. Enzyme free cloning for high throughput gene cloning and expression. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 7 (2006) 109-118
43. Barik S. Site-directed mutagenesis by double polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Biotechnol. 3 (1995) 1-7
44. de Jong R.N., Truffault V., Diercks T., AB E., Daniels M.A., Kaptein R., and Folkers G.E. Structure and DNA binding of the human Rtf1 Plus3 domain. Structure 16 (2008) 149-159
45. Folkers G.E., van der Burg B., and van der Saag P.T. Promoter architecture, cofactors, and orphan receptors contribute to cell-specific activation of the retinoic acid receptor beta2 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 32200-32212
46. AB E., Atkinson A.R., Banci L., Bertini I., Ciofi-Baffoni S., Brunner K., et al. NMR in the SPINE Structural Proteomics project. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 62 (2006) 1150-1161
47. Oschkinat H., Muller T., and Dieckmann T. Protein-structure determination with 3-dimensional and 4-dimensional NMR-spectroscopy. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 33 (1994) 277-293
48. Sattler M., Schleucher J., and Griesinger C. Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Res. Spectrosc. 34 (1999) 93-158
49. Diercks T., Coles M., and Kessler H. An efficient strategy for assignment of cross-peaks in 3D heteronuclear NOESY experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 15 (1999) 177-180
50. Pelton J.G., Torchia D.A., Meadow N.D., and Roseman S. Tautomeric states of the active-site histidines of phosphorylated and unphosphorylated IIIGlc, a signal-transducing protein from Escherichia coli, using two-dimensional heteronuclear NMR techniques. Protein Sci. 2 (1993) 543-558
51. Herrmann T., Güntert P., and Wüthrich K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 319 (2002) 209-227
52. Güntert P., Mumenthaler C., and Wüthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273 (1997) 283-298
53. AB E., Pugh D.J., Kaptein R., Boelens R., and Bonvin A.M. Direct use of unassigned resonances in NMR structure calculations with proxy residues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 7566-7571
54. Cornilescu G., Delaglio F., and Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13 (1999) 289-302
55. Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., Delano W.L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., et al. Crystallography and NMR System (CNS). 1.1 edit. (1997-2001), Yale University, New Haven, CT
56. Nederveen A.J., Doreleijers J.F., Vranken W., Miller Z., Spronk C.A., Nabuurs S.B., et al. RECOORD: a recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank. Proteins 59 (2005) 662-672
57. Vriend G. WHAT IF-a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graphics 8 (1990) 52-58
58. Laskowski R.A., Rullmannn J.A., MacArthur M.W., Kaptein R., and Thornton J.M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8 (1996) 477-486