Dual recognition-incision enzymes might be involved in mismatch repair and meiosis

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 414-418

  Malik, Harmit S ^a   Henikoff, Steven ^a  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDONUCLEASE;

ARTICLE; BASE MISPAIRING; DNA NICK TRANSLATION; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTE; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANTHOZOA; EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 0034283838     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01623-6     Document Type: Note

References (32)

1. Kolodner R.D.et al. Human mismatch repair genes and their association with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 59:1994;331-338.
2. Modrich P. Methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction. J. Biol. Chem. 264:1989;6597-6600.
3. Chi N.W., Kolodner R.D. Purification and characterization of MSH1, a yeast mitochondrial protein that binds to DNA mismatches. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;29984-29992.
4. Sia E.A.et al. Genetic control of microsatellite stability. Mutat. Res. 383:1997;61-70.
5. Marsischky G.T.et al. Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 10:1996;407-420.
6. Pochart P.et al. Conserved properties between functionally distinct MutS homologs in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;30345-30349.
7. Ross-Macdonald P., Roeder G.S. Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell. 79:1994;1069-1080.
8. Zalevsky J.et al. Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics. 153:1999;1271-1283.
9. Prolla T.A.et al. MLH1, PMS1, and MSH2 interactions during the initiation of DNA mismatch repair in yeast. Science. 265:1994;1091-1093.
10. Wang T.F.et al. Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;13914-13919.
11. Eisen J.A. A phylogenomic study of the MutS family of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1998;4291-4300.
12. Ban C., Wang W. Structural basis for MutH activation in E. coli mismatch repair and relationship of MutH to restriction endonucleases. EMBO J. 17:1998;1526-1534.
13. Bellacosa A.et al. MED1, a novel human methyl-CpG-binding endonuclease, interacts with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;3969-3974.
14. Bader S.et al. Somatic frameshift mutations in the MBD4 gene of sporadic colon cancers with mismatch repair deficiency. Oncogene. 18:1999;8044-8047.
15. Pont-Kingdom G.A.et al. A coral mitochondrial mutS gene. Nature. 375:1995;109-111.
16. Pont-Kingdom G.A.et al. Mitochondrial DNA of the coral Sarcophyton glaucum contains a gene for a homologue of bacterial MutS. a possible case of gene transfer from the nucleus to the mitochondrion J. Mol. Evol. 46:1998;419-431.
17. Shub D.A.et al. Amino acid sequence motif of group I intron endonucleases is conserved in open reading frames of group II introns. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19:1994;402-404.
18. Gorbalenya A.E. Self-splicing group I and group II introns encode homologous (putative) DNA endonucleases of a new family. Protein Sci. 3:1994;1117-1120.
19. Altschul S.F.et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST. a new generation of protein database search programs Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
20. Henikoff S., Henikoff J.G. Embedding strategies for effective use of information from multiple sequence alignments. Protein Sci. 6:1997;698-705.
21. Zimmerly S.et al. Group II intron mobility occurs by target DNA-primed reverse transcription. Cell. 82:1995;545-554.
22. Eisen J.A. Phylogenomics. improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis Genome Res. 8:1998;163-167.
23. Aravind L.et al. Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:1999;1223-1242.
24. Eisen J.A.et al. Gastrogenomic delights: a movable feast. Nat. Med. 3:1997;1076-1078.
25. Eisen J.A., Hanawalt P.C. A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes. Mutat. Res. 435:1999;171-213.
26. Moreira D., Philippe H. Smr. a bacterial and eukaryotic homologue of the C-terminal region of the MutS2 family Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;298-300.
27. Marcotte E.M.et al. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature. 402:1999;83-86.
28. Yang J.et al. Identification of the endonuclease domain encoded by R2 and other site-specific, non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;7847-7852.
29. Jiricny J. Replication errors. cha(lle)nging the genome EMBO J. 17:1998;6427-6436.
30. Umar A.et al. Requirement for PCNA in DNA mismatch repair at a step preceding DNA resynthesis. Cell. 87:1996;65-73.
31. Ko T.P.et al. The crystal structure of the DNase domain of colicin E7 in complex with its inhibitor Im7 protein. Struct. Fold Des. 7:1999;91-102.
32. Schneider T.D., Stephens R.M. Sequence logos. a new way to display consensus sequences Nucleic Acids Res. 18:1990;6097-6100.