Modeling learner variability in CALL

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 305-321

  Heift, Trude ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer assisted language learning; Learner language; Learner modeling; Learner variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349175081     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220802343421     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Amaral, L., & Meurers, D. (2007). Conceptualizing Student Models for Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Paper presented at the User Modeling 2007: 11th International Conference C. Conati & K.F. McCoy (Eds.) Lecture notes in computer science. Wien, New York, Berlin: Springer.
2. Bull, S. (1994). Student modeling for second language acquisition. Computers and Education, 23(1-2), 13-20.
3. Bull, S. (2000). 'Do it yourself student models for collaborative student modelling and peer interaction. In BP. Goettl, H.M. Halff, C. Redfield Luckhardt, & V.J. Shute (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems. 4th International Conference, ITS '98 (pp. 176-185). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
4. Chapelle, C.A. (2004). Technology and second language learning: Expanding methods and agendas. System, 32(4), 593-601.
5. Corder, S. (1914). Error analysis. In J.P.B. Allen, & P. Corder (Eds.), The Edinburgh course in applied linguistics. Volume 3: Techniques in applied linguistics (pp. 122-131). London: Oxford University Press.
6. Corder, S.P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Cui, Y., & Bull, S. (2005). Context and learner modelling for the mobile foreign language learner. System, 33(2), 353-367.
8. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.
9. de Bot, K., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and applied linguistics: The ultimate 'so what'? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 116-118.
10. Di Donato, R., Clyde, M., & Vansant, J. (2003). Deutsch, Na Klar! An introductory German course. Boston: McGraw Hill.
11. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558-589.
14. Elsom-Cook, M. (1993). Student modeling in intelligent tutoring systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 7(3-4), 227-240.
15. Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1989a). Variation in second language acquisition. Volume I: Pragmatics, discourse and communication. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
16. Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1989b). Variation in second language acquisition. Volume II: Psycholinguistic Issues. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
17. Hansen, C., & McCalla, G.I. (2003). Assisting students by analysing their interaction and learning. In V. Aleven, H.U. Hoppe, J. Kay, R. Mizoguchi, H. Pain, F. Verdejo, & K. Yacef (Eds.), Supplementary proceedings of artificial intelligence in education conference (AIED2003) (pp. 258-268). Sydney: University of Sydney.
18. Hegelheimer, V. (2003, October 10-11). Help options in CALL. Paper presented at the Conference on Technology for SLL, Memorial Union, Iowa State University.
19. Heift, T. (1998). Designed intelligence: A language teacher model. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.
20. Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416-431.
21. Heift, T. (2005). Inspectable learner reports for web-based language learning. ReCALL, 17(1), 32-46.
22. Heift, T. (2006). Context-sensitive help in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2-3), 243-259.
23. Heift, T. (2007). Learner personas in CALL. CALICO, 25(1), 1-8.
24. Heift, T., & McFetridge, P. (1999). Exploiting the student model to emphasize language teaching pedagogy in natural language processing. In M.B. Olsen (Ed.), Computer mediated language assessment and evaluation in natural language processing. A joint ACL-IALL Symposium (pp. 55-62). University of Maryland. Retrieved 31 January 2008 from: http://umiacs.umd.edu/~molsen/acl- iall/Accepted/heift-mcfetridge.rtf
25. Heift, T., & Nicholson, D. (2001). Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(4), 310-325.
26. Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2003). Student modeling and ab initio language learning. System, 31(4), 519-535.
27. Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2007). Intelligence and errors in CALL. Parsers and pedagogues. New York: Routledge.
28. Johnson, W.L. (2007). Serious use of a serious game for language learning. In R. Luckin et al. (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 67-74). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
29. LaReau, P., & Vockell, E. (1989). The computer in the foreign language curriculum. Santa Cruz, CA: Mitchell.
30. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.
31. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Second language acquisition and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 165-181.
32. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Southbank, Victoria: Thomson/Heinle.
33. Levin, L.S., & Evans, D.A. (1995). ALICE-chan: A case study in ICALL theory and practice. In V.M. Holland, J.D. Kaplan, & M.R. Sams (Eds.), Intelligent language tutors: Theory shaping technology (pp. 77-99). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Mabbott, A., & Bull, S. (2004). Alternative views on knowledge: Presentation of open learner models. In J.C. Lester, R.M. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 7th International Conference (pp. 689-698). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. Mitrovic, A., Djordjevic-Kajan, S., & Stoimenov, L. (1996). INSTRUCT: Modeling students by asking questions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6, 273-302.
36. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2002). Evaluating the effects of open student models on learning. Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems. Second International Conference (pp. 296-305). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
37. Richards, J. (1974). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.
38. Schulze, M. (2008). Modeling SLA processes using NLP. In C.A. Chapelle, Y-R. Chung, & J. Xu (Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic assessment (149-166). Ames, IO: Iowa State University.
39. Selinker, L. (1974) Interlanguage. In J.C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 31-54). London: Longman.
40. Selinker, L. (1969). Language transfer. General Linguistics 9, 67-92.
41. Tarone, Elaine. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.
42. Van Noord, G. (1997). An efficient implementation of the head-corner parser. Computational Linguistics, 23(3), 425-456.
43. Zapata-Rivera, J.-D., & Greer, J.E. (2002). Construction and inspection of learner models. Proceedings of computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 495-497). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.