Evaluating the effects of open student models on learning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2347 LNCS, Issue , 2002, Pages 296-305

  Mitrovic, Antonija ^a   Martin, Brent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; WEBSITES; EDUCATION; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CONTROL GROUPS; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; NEW STUDY; OPEN STUDENT MODELS; POST TEST; SELF ASSESSMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84874871029     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47952-x_31     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K. (2000) Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? Proc. ITS'2000, Springer-Verlag, pp. 292-303.
2. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K., Cross, K. (1999) Tutoring Answer Explanation Fosters Learning with Understanding. In: Lajoie, S.P., Vivet, M. (eds): Proc. AIED'99, pp. 199-206.
3. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P., Brown, A.L.: Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problemsolving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2) (1993) 221-252.
4. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., Weber, G. (1996) ELM-ART: an Intelligent Tutoring System on World Wide Web. Proc. ITS'96, pp. 261-269.
5. Bull, S., Brna, P. (1997) What does Susan Know that Paul Doesn't? (and vice versa): Contributing to each other's student model. Proc. AIED 97, pp. 568-570.
6. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reinmann, P., Glaser, R. (1989) Self- Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
7. Conati, C., VanLehn, K.: Further Results from the Evaluation of an Intelligent Computer Tutor to Coach Self-Explanation. Proc. ITS'2000, Springer-Verlag, (2000) 304-313.
8. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., Brna, P. (2001) Applying Interactive Open Learner Models to Learning Technical Terminology. Proc. UM 2001, Springer, pp. 148-157.
9. Kay, J. (1995) The UM toolkit for cooperative user modelling. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 149-196.
10. Mitrovic, A. Investigating students' self-assessment skills. Proc. UM-2001, Sonthofen, July 2001, Springer-Verlag LNAI 2109, pp. 247-250.
11. Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S.: Evaluation of a Constraint-based Tutor for a Database Language. Int. J. on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(3-4), (1999) 238-256.
12. Morales, R., Pain, H., Conlon, T. (2001) Effects of Inspecting Learner Models on Learners' Abilities. Proc. AIED 2001, pp. 434-445.
13. Ohlsson, S.: Constraint-based student modeling. In: Greer, J.E., McCalla, G (eds): Student modeling: the key to individualized knowledge-based instruction, (1994) 167-189.
14. Paiva, A., Self, J. (1995) TAGUS - a user and learner modelling workbench. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197-226.
15. Swanson, H.L.: Influence of Metacognitive Knowledge and Aptitude on Problem Solving. J. Educational Psychology, 82 (1990) 306-314.
16. White, B.Y., Shimoda, T. A, Frederiksen, J.R. (1999) Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development. Int. Journal on AI in Education, vol 10, 151-182.
17. Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.E. (2000) Inspecting and Visualizing Distributed Bayesian Student Models. Proc. ITS'2000, Springer, pp. 544-553.