Landmark morphometrics and the analysis of variation

Variation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 49-69

  Richtsmeier, Joan T ^a,b   Lele, Subhash R ^c   Cole, Theodore M ^d  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882541134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012088777-4/50006-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Atchley W., Hall B. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biological Reviews 1991, 66:101-157.
2. Boas F. The horizontal plane of the skull and the general problem of the comparison of variable forms. Science 1905, 21:862-863.
3. Bookstein F.L. Foundations of morphmetrics. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics 1982, 13:451-470.
4. Bookstein F. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science 1986, 1:181-242.
5. Chapman R. Conventional Procrustes approaches. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop 1990, 251-267. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI. F. Rohlf, F. Bookstein (Eds.).
6. Chernoff B., Magwene P. Afterword. Morphological Integration 1999, 319-348. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. E. Olson, R. Miller (Eds.).
7. Cheverud J. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 1982, 36:1737-1747.
8. Cole T. Historical note: Early anthropological contributions to "geometric morphometrics.". American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1996, 101:291-296.
9. Cole T.M., Lele S., Richtsmeier J.T. A parametric bootstrap approach to the detection of phylogenetic signals in landmark data. Morphology, Shape, and Phylogeny 2002, 194-219. Taylor and Francis, London. N. MacLeod, P. Forey (Eds.).
10. Dryden I., Mardia K. Statistical Shape Analysis 1998, Wiley, Chichester, England.
11. Falconer D. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1981, Longman, London.
12. Falconer D., Mackay T. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman, Essex, England.
13. Goodall C. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society Series B 1991, 53:285-339.
14. Hall B. Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: Cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biology and Philosophy 2003, 18:219-247.
15. Kent J.T., Mardia K. Consistency of Procrustes estimators. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 1997, 59:281-290.
16. Lele S. Some comments on coordinate free and scale invariant methods in morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1991, 85:407-418.
17. Lele S. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) of landmarks data: Estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Mathematical Geology 1993, 25:573-602.
18. Lele S., Cole T.M. A new test for shape differences when variance-covariance matrices are unequal. Journal of Human Evolution 1996, 31:193-212.
19. Lele S., McCulloch C. Invariance, identifiability, and morphometrics. Journal of American Statistical Association 2002, 971:796-806.
20. Lele S., Richtsmeier J.T. Statistical models in morphometrics: Are they realistic?. Systematic Zoology 1990, 39:60-69.
21. Lele S., Richtsmeier J.T. Euclidean distance matrix analysis: A coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1991, 86:415-427.
22. Lele S., Richtsmeier J. An Invariant Approach to the Statistical Analysis of Shapes 2001, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, London.
23. Neyman J., Scott E. Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrika 1948, 16:1-32.
24. Richtsmeier J.T., Lele S. A coordinate-free approach to the analysis of growth patterns: Models and theoretical considerations. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1993, 68:381-411.
25. Richtsmeier J., Cheverud J., Lele S. Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992, 21:231-253.
26. Richtsmeier J.T., Cole T.M., Krovitz G., Valeri C.J., Lele S. Preoperative morphology and development in sagittal synostosis. Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology 1998, 18:64-78.
27. Richtsmeier J.T., Baxter L.L., Reeves R.H. Parallels of craniofacial maldevelopment in Down syndrome and Ts65Dn mice. Developmental Dynamics 2000, 217:137-145.
28. Richtsmeier J., DeLeon V., Lele S. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 2002, 45:63-91.
29. Rohlf F., Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 1990, 39:40-59.
30. Rutherford S.L. From genotype to phenotype: Buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information. Bioessays 2000, 22:1095-1105.
31. Satokata I., Maas R. Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nature Genetics 1994, 6:348-356.
32. Siegel A.F., Benson R.H. A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics 1982, 38:341-350.
33. Sneath P.H.A. Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. Journal of Zoology London 1967, 151:65-122.
34. Thompson D. On Growth and Form 1917, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
35. Thompson D. On Growth and Form 1992, The complete revised edition, Dover, New York.