A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: Comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 218-225

  Daas, M ^a   Dubois, G ^b,c   Bonnet, A S ^b   Lipinski, P ^b   Rignon Bret, C ^a  

^a René Descartes University   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c Orthopédie Biomécanique Locomotion   (France)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element model; Mandible; Overdenture attachment

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MASTICATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DENTURE BEARING SURFACE; MANDIBLE; OVERDENTURE ATTACHMENT;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; IMPLANT; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TITANIUM;

EID: 38149051177     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Mericske-Stern R., Steinlin S.T., Marti P., and Geering A.H. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 5 (1994) 9-18
2. Jemt T., Chai J., Harnett J., Health M.R., Hutton J.E., and Johns R.N. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 (1996) 291-298
3. Heckmann S.M., Winter W., Meyer M., Weber H.P., and Wichman M.G. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 1. In vivo verification of stereolithographic model. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 (2001) 617-623
4. Oetterli M., Kiener P., and Mericske-Stern R. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on peri-implant parameters. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 536-542
5. Tokuhisa M., Matsushita Y., and Koyano K. ln vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont 16 2 (2003) 128-134
6. Gotfredsen K., and Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 13 2 (2000) 125-130
7. Cune M., Van Kampen F., Van der Bilt A., and Bosman F. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 18 2 (2005) 99-105
8. Sadowsky S.J., and Caputo A.A. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 84 (2000) 327-334
9. Meijer H.J., Kuiper J.H., Starmans F.J.M., and Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 96-101
10. Meijer H.J., Starmans F.J., Steen W.H., and Bosman F. Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. J Oral Rehabil 21 1 (1994) 47-56
11. Menicucci G., Lorenzetti M., Pera P., and Preti G. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 6 (1998) 851-856
12. Brunski J.B. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 (1988) 85-97
13. Kenny R., and Richards M.W. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 559-564
14. Chun H.J., Park D.N., Han C.H., Heo S.J., Heo M.S., and Koak J.Y. Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil 32 3 (2005) 193-205
15. Walton J.N., and MacEntee M.L. Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 71 (1994) 283-288
16. Dudic A., and Mericske-Stern R. Retention mechanisms and prosthetic complications of implant-supported mandibular overdentures: long-term results. Clin Oral Implants Res 4 4 (2002) 212-219
17. Mericske-Stern R. Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ball-shaped retentive anchors. A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 36-43
18. Heckmann S.M., Winter W., Meyer M., Weber H.P., and Wichman M.G. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2. A methodical study using five types of attachments. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 (2001) 640-647
19. Porter J.A., Petropoulos V.C., and Brunski J.B. Comparaison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 (2002) 651-662
20. Menicucci G., Lorenzetti M., Pera P., and Preti G. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 369-376
21. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE. In: Boucher's prothodontic treatment for edentulous patient. 11th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1997. p. 8-29.
22. Voigt L.J. Über die Bezechnung zwischen den beidem Elastizitätskonstanten isotroper Körper. Wied Ann 33 (1889) 573-587
23. Reuss A. Berechnung der Fliessgrenze von Mischkristalen auf grund der Plastizitätsbedigung für Einkristalle. Z Angew Math Mech 9 (1929) 49-58
24. Brunski J.B., Puleo D.A., and Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 15-46
25. Takayama Y., Yamada T., Araki O., Seki T., and Kawasaki T. The dynamic behaviour of a lower complete denture during unilateral loads: analysis using the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 28 (2001) 1064-1074
26. Throckmorton G.S., and Throckmorton L. Quantitative calculations of temporomandibular joint reaction forces-I. The importance of the magnitude of the jaw muscle forces. J Biomechanics 18 6 (1985) 445-452
27. Koolstra J.H. Number crunching with the human masticatory system. J Dent Res 82 9 (2003) 672-676
28. Ogata K., and Satoh M. Centre and magnitude of the vertical forces in complete denture weares. J Oral Rehabil 22 (1995) 113-119
29. Cruz M., Wassall T., Toledo E.M., Da Silva Barra L.P., and De Castro Lemonge A.C. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 5 (2003) 675-684
30. Van Eidjen T.M.G.J., Brugman P., Weijs W.A., and Oosting J. Coactivation of jaw muscles: recruitment order and level as a function of bite force direction and magnitude. J Biomech 23 (1990) 475-485
31. Tortopidid D., Lyons M.F., and Baxendale R.H. Bite force, endurance and masseter muscle fatigue in healthy edentulous subjects and those with TDM. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999) 321-328
32. Vanzyl P.P., Grundling N.L., Jooste C.H., and Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants 10 (1995) 51-57
33. Carter D.R., Fyhrie D.P., and Whalen R.T. Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. J Biomech 20 8 (1987) 785-794
34. Lacroix D., Prendergast P.J., Li G., and Marsh D. Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: application to fracture healing. Med Bio Eng Computing 40 (2002) 14-21