Student reflections on formative e-assessment: Expectations and perceptions

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 221-234

  Walker, David J ^a   Topping, Keith ^a   Rodrigues, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anxiety; E assessment; Feedback; Formative; Student perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 52149083215     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880802324178     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bull, J., and C. McKenna. 2000. CAA Centre update. Proceedings of the 4th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, June 21-22, in Loughborough. http://www.caaconference. com/pastConferences/2000/proceedings/ jbull.pdf
2. Bull, J., and C. McKenna. 2004. Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment. London: Routledge-Falmer.
3. Cassady, J.C., and B.E. Gridley. 2005. The effects of online formative and summative assessment on test anxiety and performance. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 4, no. 1: 1-31.
4. Clarke, D. 2001. Complementary accounts methodology. In Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms, ed. D. Clarke, 13-32. London: Kluwer.
5. Conole, G., and B. Warburton. 2005. A review of computer-assisted assessment. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology 13, no. 1: 17-31.
6. Creanor, L., K. Trinder, D. Gowan, and C. Howells. 2006. LEX: The learner experience of e-learning. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_ documents/ LEX%20Final%20Report_August06.pdf.
7. Harwood, I., and B. Warburton. 2004. Thinking the unthinkable: Using project risk management when introducing computer-assisted assessments. Proceedings of the 8th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 6-7, in Loughborough. http://www.caaconference.com/ pastConferences/2004/ proceedings/Harwood_Warburton.pdf.
8. Hepplestone, S., and P. Helm. 2003. Strategies for coping with unexpected uptake of CBA. Proceedings of the 7th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 8-9, in Loughbor-ough. http://www.caaconference.com/ pastConferences/2003/procedings/hepplestone.pdf.
9. Hofer, B.K., and P.R. Pintrich. 1997. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research 67, no. 1: 88-140.
10. King, T., and E. Duke-Williams. 2001. Using computer aided assessment to test higher level learning outcomes. Proceedings of the 5th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 2-3, in Loughborough. http://www.caaconference.com/pastConferences/2001/proceedings/ p1.pdf.
11. McCausland, W.D. 2003. Extended case study: Computer aided assessment and independent learning in macroeconomics. Bristol: University of Bristol. http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/ showcase/ext_causland.htm.
12. Nicol, D. 2007. Laying a foundation for lifelong learning: Case studies of e-assessment in large 1st-year classes. British Journal of Educational Technology 38, no. 4: 668-78.
13. Northcote, M. 2003. E-assessment in higher education: The influence of pedagogy on the construction of students' epistemologies. Issues in Educational Research 13, no. 1: 66-84.
14. O'Hare, D. 2001. Student views of formative and summative CAA. Proceedings of the 5th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 2-3, in Loughborough. http:// www.caaconference.com/pastConferences/2001/ proceedings/m2.pdf.
15. Patterson, A., and G. Bellaby. 2002. An initial experiment with computer aided assessment in level one systems analysis. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, August 27-29, in Loughborough.
16. Reid, K., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin. 2005. Exploring lived experience. The Psychologist 18, no. 1: 20-3.
17. Ricketts, C., and S. Zakrzewski. 2004. How do the risks of a web-based CAA system differ from those of a closed network system? Proceedings of the 8th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 6-7, in Loughborough. http://www.caaconference.com/past-Conferences/2004/proceedings/ Ricketts2.pdf.
18. Thelwall, M. 2000. Computer-based assessment: A versatile educational tool. Computers & Education 34, no. 1: 37-49.
19. Warburton, B., and G. Conole. 2003. CAA in UK HEIs - The state of the art. Proceedings of the 7th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 8-9, in Loughborough. http:// www.caaconference.com/ pastConferences/2003/proceedings/warburton.pdf
20. Zakrzewski, S., and J. Bull. 1998. Computer-assisted assessment: Suggested guidelines for an institutional strategy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23, no. 3: 283-94.
21. Zakrzewski, S., and C. Steven. 2000. A model for computer-based assessment: The Catherine wheel principle. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25, no. 2: 201-15.