Computer-assisted assessment: Suggested guidelines for an institutional strategy

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 283-294

  Stephens, Derek ^a   Bull, Joanna ^b   Wade, Winnie ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010775855     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293980230305     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. BARNETT, E., BRUNNER, D., MAIER, P. & WARREN, A. (1996) Technology in Teaching and Learning: a guide for academics (Southampton, Interactive Learning Centre, University of Southampton).
2. Bocu, P. GREASLEY, A. & KELLY, R. (1996) Managing multimedia: a model for the production of computer-based assessments and multimedia courseware. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
3. BROHN, D. M. (1986) The use of computers in assessment in higher education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(3), pp. 231-239.
4. BROWN, G., BULL, J. & PENDLEBURY, M. (1997) Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education (London and New York, Routledge).
5. CALLEAR, D. & KING, T. (1997) Using computer-based tests for information science, Association for Learning Technology Journal, 5(1), pp. 27-32.
6. CAMPBELL, C. (1995) Welcoming Address, Embedding Technology in Teaching, Conference Proceedings, Joint Teaching and Learning Technology programme and Computers in Teaching Initiative Conference, November, London, pp. 5-6.
7. CAMPBELL, G. C, DAY, J. & WINKWORTH, I. (1996) Bottom-up meets top-down: an information strategy approach to technology in the curriculum. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
8. COMMITTEE OF SCOTTISH UNIVERSITY PRINCIPALS (CSUP) (1992) Teaching and Learning in an Expanding Higher Education System (Edinburgh, SCFC).
9. DARBY, J. (1996) Eight years with the CTI: a personal reflection on learning technology in UK higher education. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
10. FREEMAN, A. & WELLS, J. (1994) Computer-aided Learning in Economics (University of Greenwich, Enterprise in Higher Education Unit).
11. HAWKRIDGE, D. (1993) Challenging Educational Technology (London, Athone Press).
12. KING, T. (1996) The management of continuous computer-aided assessment. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
13. KNIVETON, B. H. (1996) Student perceptions of assessment methods, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 229-237.
14. LAURILLARD, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching (London, Routledge).
15. LAURILLARD, D., SWIFT, B. & DARBY, J. (1993) Academics' use of courseware materials: a survey, Association for Learning Technology Journal, 1(1), pp. 4-14.
16. LEASK, M. (1994) Modular courses, assessment and student capability, in: A. JENKINS & L. WALKER (Eds) Developing Student Capability through Modular Courses (London, Kogan Page).
17. LEIBLUM, M. D. (1992) Implementing CAL at a university, Computers and Education, 18 (1-3), pp. 109-118.
18. LONGSTAFFE, J. A., WHITTLESTONE, K. D., EDWARDS, J. D., WILLIAMS, J. & HAMMOND, P. M. (1995) Supporting Learning Technology in Higher Education (Sheffield, Information Technology Training Initiative, Universities' and Colleges Staff Development Agency).
19. LONGSTAFFE, J. A., WILLIAMS, J., WHITTLESTONE, K. D., HAMMOND, P. M. & EDWARDS, J. D. (1996) Establishing a support service for educational technology within a university, Association of Learning Technology Journal, 4(1) pp. 85-92.
20. MCCABE, M. (1993) Computing practical exams for the over-forties (large student numbers) Monitor, 4, Winter, pp. 82-88.
21. MCCABE, M. & TROISE, I. (1996) A recipe for the successful integration of computer technology into teaching and assessment. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
22. MCDONOUGH, D., SCRIVENS, J. & RADA, R. (1994) University courseware development: comparative views of computer-based teaching by users and non-users, Computers and Education, 23(3), pp. 211-220.
23. NEILL, N. T. (1996) The use of technology within the formal grading process. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
24. NEILSON, I. & THOMAS, R. (1996) Designing educational software as a re-usable resource, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12, pp. 114-126.
25. PRITCHETT, N. & ZAKRZEWSKI, S. (1996) Interactive computer assessment of large groups: student responses, Innovations in Education and Training International, 33(3), pp. 242-247.
26. RICHARDS, C. G. (1997).A review of WWW computer-assisted assessment systems. Internal report, Flexible Learning Initiative, Loughborough University, January 1997, p.12.
27. RYAN, M., WELLS, J., FREEMAN, A. & HALLAM, G. (1996) Resource-based learning strategies: implications for students and institutions, Association of Learning Technology Journal, 4(1), pp. 93-98.
28. SANDALLS, L. H. (1992) An overview of the uses of computer-based assessment and diagnosis, Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 21(1), pp. 67-78.
29. SLATER, J. B. (1996) The impact of TLTP, Active Learning, 4 (July), pp. 3-5.
30. SMITH, B. & BROWN, S. (Eds) (1995) Research, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (London, Kogan Page).
31. STEPHENS, D. (1994) Using computer-assisted assessment: time saver or sophisticated distraction? Active Learning, 1, pp. 11-15.
32. THELWALL, M. (1996) Computer-based assessment at the University of Wolverhampton. Paper given at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, September, Glasgow.
33. TIMES HIGHER EDUCATIONAL SUPPLEMENT (1996) Lecturers Frozen Out, 22, November, p. 1.
34. TEACHING AND LEARNING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME (TLTP) (1995) Teaching and Learning Technology Support Network, TLTP Newsletter, 5 (Autumn) pp. 16-17.
35. ZAKRZEWSKI, S. & BULL, J. (1988) Mass implementation and evaluation of computer based assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), pp. 141-152.