Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left behind

Language Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 267-284

  Harper, Candace A ^a   De Jong, Ester J ^a   Platt, Elizabeth J ^a  

^a 2423 Norman Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

English as a second language; English language learners; Highly qualified teachers; No Child Left Behind; Reading First; Teacher expertise

Indexed keywords

EID: 51649127668     PISSN: 15684555     EISSN: 15731863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10993-008-9102-y     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abedi, J. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4-14.
2. Allington, R. L. (Ed.). (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Antunez, B. (2002). Implementing Reading First with English language learners (Directions in Language and Education No. 15). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs. Available at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/directions/15. pdf.
4. Arkoudis, S. (2005). Fusing pedagogic horizons: Language and content teaching in the mainstream. Linguistics and Education, 16, 173-187.
5. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45-57.
7. Butler, T. (2007). Commissioner Blomberg congratulates "A" and "B" schools. Retrieved February 12, 2008 from http://www.flboe.org/ news/2007/2007_06_29.asp.
8. Byrnes, H. (2005). Perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 89, 582-616.
9. Chatterji, M. (2005). Closing Florida's achievement gap. FIE Policy Brief 4. Florida Institute of Education at the University of North Florida. Jacksonville, FL.
10. Commins, N. L., & Miramotes, O. B. (2005). Linguistic diversity and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Corson, D. (1999). Language policy in schools: A resource for teachers and administrators. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Crandall, J. A. (Ed.). (1995). ESL through content-area instruction. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
13. Crawford, J. (2003). A few things Ron Unz would prefer you didn't know about English learners in California. Retrieved February 12, 2008 from http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JWCRAWFORD/castats.htm.
14. Crawford, J. (2004). No Child Left Behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. Forum on Ideas to Improve the NCLB Accountability Provisions for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners. Center on Education Policy. Available at http://www.cep-dc.org/.
15. Creese, A. (2005). Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual classrooms. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
16. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
17. Cummins, J. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Researcher, 36, 564-572.
18. Davison, C. (2001). ESL in Australian schools: From the margins to the mainstream. In B. Mohan, C. Leung & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 11-29). London: Pearson.
19. Evans, B., & Hornberger, N. H. (2005). No child left behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language education policy in the United States. Language Policy, 4, 87-106.
20. Florida Department of Education. (1995). Inclusion as an instructional model for LEP students. Technical Assistance Paper No. 019-ESOL-95. Tallahassee, Florida.
21. Freeman, D. E., & Freeman, Y. S. (2000). Teaching reading in multilingual classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Gamse, B. C., Bloom, H. S., Kemple, J. J., & Jacob, R. T. (2008). Reading First impact study: Interim report. Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education.
23. Goodman, K., Shannon, P., Goodman, Y., & Rapoport, R. (Eds.). (2004). Saving our schools: The case for public education saying no to "No Child Left Behind". Berkeley, CA: RDR Books.
24. Harklau, L. (1994). ESL and mainstream classes: Contrasting second language learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 241-272.
25. de Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2004). Is ESL just good teaching? In M. Bigelow & C. Walker (Eds.), Creating teacher community: selected papers from the third international conference on language teacher education (pp. 115-131). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquistion.
26. de Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough? Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 101-124.
27. Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English language learners. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152-162.
28. Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2005). Working with ELLs: What's the difference? In A. Huerta Macias (Ed.), Working with English language learners: Perspectives and practice (pp. 107-135). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
29. Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (in press). English language teacher expertise: The Elephant in the room. Education.
30. Harper, C. A., & Platt, E. J. (Fall, 1998). Full inclusion for secondary ESOL students: Some concerns from Florida. TESOL Journal. 30-36.
31. Harper, C. A., & Platt, E. J. (2007). No Child Left Behind is language policy. Paper presented at the meeting of the American association of applied linguistics, Costa Mesa CA.
32. Harper, C. A., Platt, E. J., Naranjo, C. J., & Boynton, S. S. (2007). Marching in unison: Florida ESL teachers and No Child Left Behind. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 642-651.
33. Krashen, S. D. (2002). More smoke and mirrors: A critique of the National Reading Panel Report on fluency. In R. L. Allington (Ed.), Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence (pp. 112-124). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
34. Langman, J. (2003). The effects of ESL-trained content-area teacher: Reducing middle-school students to incidental language learners. Prospect, 18(1), 14-26.
35. Menken, K. (2006). Teaching to the test: How No Child Left Behind impacts language policy, curriculum, instruction for English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 521-546.
36. Menken, K. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
37. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning, and identity. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
39. Molnar, A. (Ed.). (2004). Reform Florida. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Policy Research Unit. Available at http://edpolicylab.org.
40. Moore, H. (2007). Non-language policies and ESL: Some connections. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 573-583.
41. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved June 11, 2008 from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/smallbook_pdf.pdf.
42. Olsen, L. (1997). Made in America. New York: The Free Press.
43. Orfield, G., Losen, D., Wald, J., & Swanson, C., (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Contributors: Advocates for Children of New York, The Civil Society Institute.
44. Platt, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (Fall, 1997). Problems and possibilities of inclusion for LEP students. Sunshine State TESOL Journal, 9-19.
45. Platt, E. J., Harper, C. A., & Mendoza, M. B. (2003). Dueling philosophies: Inclusion or separation for Florida's English language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 105-133.
46. Platt, E. J., & Troudi, S. (1997). Mary and her teachers: A Grebo-speaking child's place in the mainstream classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81, 28-49.
47. Reeves, J. (2004). "Like everybody else": Equalizing educational opportunity for English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 43-66.
48. Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 401-428.
49. Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 207-217.
50. Stoller, F. L. (2004). Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 261-283.
51. TESOL. (2002). TESOL/NCATE P-12 standards for teacher education programs. Alexandria, VA. Online documents at URL www.ncate.org/documents/ ProgramStandards/tesol.pdf. September 3, 2007.
52. TESOL. (2006). PreK-12 English language proficiency standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
53. Warford, J. (2005). Enrollment of Limited English Proficient students in required intenstive reading courses. Memorandum to Florida district school superintendent. Tallahassee, FL.
54. Wright, W. E. (2006). A catch-22 for language learners. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 22-27.
55. Zehler, A., Fleischman, H., Hopstock, P., Stephenson, T., Pendizick, M., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities (Vol. 1). Research Report. Retrieved February 11, 2008 from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/resabout/research/descriptivestudyfiles/ volI_research_fulltxt.pdf.