Calculating absolute and relative protein abundance from mass spectrometry-based protein expression data

Nature Protocols

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1444-1451

  Vogel, Christine ^a   Marcotte, Edward M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROCESS DESIGN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; YEAST CELL;

EID: 51649124498     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.132     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646-4658 (2003).
2. Silva, J.C., Gorenstein, M.V., Li, G.Z., Vissers, J.P. & Geromanos, S.J. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: A virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 144-156 (2006).
3. Oda, Y., Huang, K., Cross, F.R., Cowburn, D. & Chait, B.T. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6591-6596 (1999).
4. Ong, S.E. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 252-262 (2005).
5. Ong, S.E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002).
6. Gygi, S.P. et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17 994-999 (1999).
7. Gerber, S.A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M.W. & Gygri, S.P. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 6940-6945 (2003).
8. Ishihama, Y. et al. Quantitative mouse brain proteomics using culture-derived isotope tags as internal standards. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 617-621 (2005).
9. Liu, H., Sadygov, R.G. & Yates, J.R. 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 4193-4201 (2004).
10. Gao, J., Opiteck, G.J., Friedrichs, M.S., Dongre, A.R. & Hefta, S.A. Changes in the protein expression of yeast as a function of carbon source. J. Proteome Res. 2, 643-649 (2003).
11. Florens, L. et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature 419, 520-526 (2002).
12. Gao, J., Friedrichs, M.S., Dongre, A.R. & Opiteck, G.J. Guidelines for the routine application of the Peptide hits technique. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 16, 1231-1238 (2005).
13. States, D.J. et al. Challenges in deriving high-confidence protein identifications from data gathered by a HUPO plasma proteome collaborative study. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 333-338 (2006).
14. Blondeau, F. et al. Tandem MS analysis of brain clathrin-coated vesicles reveals their critical involvement in synaptic vesicle recycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 3833-3838 (2004).
15. Kislinger, T. et al. Global survey of organ and organette protein expression in mouse: Combined proteomic and transcriptomic profiling. Cell 125, 173-186 (2006).
16. Kislinger, T. et al. Proteome dynamics during C2C12 myoblast differentiation. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 887-901 (2005).
17. Steen, H. & Pandey, A. Proteomics goes quantitative: Measuring protein abundance. Trends Biotechnol. 20, 361-364 (2002).
18. Elias, J.E., Gibbons, F.D., King, O.D., Roth, F.P. & Gygi, S.P. Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 214-219 (2004).
19. Gay, S., Binz, P.A., Hochstrasser, D.F. & Appel, R.D. Peptide mass fingerprinting peak intensity prediction: Extracting knowledge from spectra. Proteomics 2, 1374-1391 (2002).
20. Craig, R., Cortens, J.P. & Beavis, R.C. The use of proteotypic peptide libraries for protein identification. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 19, 1844-1850 (2005).
21. Kuster, B., Schirle, M., Mallick, P. & AebersoLd, R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 577-583 (2005).
22. Le Bihan, T., Robinson, M.D., Stewart, I.I. & Figeys, D. Definition and characterization of a "trypsinosome" from specific peptide characteristics by nano-HPLC-MS/MS and in silico analysis ofcomptex protein mixtures. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1138-1148 (2004).
23. Mallick, P. et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 125-131 (2007).
24. Tang, H. et al. A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability. Bioinformatics 22, e481-e488 (2006).
25. Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X. & Marcotte, E.M. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 117-124 (2007).
26. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
27. Newman, J.R. et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441, 840-846 (2006).
28. Futcher, B., Latter, G.I., Monardo, P., McLaughlin, C.S. & Garrels, J.I. A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7357-7368 (1999).
29. Lopez-Campistrous, A. et al. Localization, annotation, and comparison of the Escherichia coli K-12 proteome undertwo states of growth. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 1205-1209 (2005).
30. Lu, P. et al. Global metabolic changes following loss of a feedback loop reveal dynamic steady states of the yeast metabolome. Metab. Eng. 9, 8-20 (2007).
31. Wang, R. & Marcotte, E. M. The proteomic response of Mycobacterium smegmatis to anti-tuberculosis drugs suggests targeted pathways. J. Proteome Res. 7, 855-865 (2008).
32. Baerenfaller, K. et al. Genome-scale proteomics reveals Arabidopsis thaliana gene models and proteome dynamics. Science 320, 938-941 (2008).
33. Schmidt, M.W., Houseman, A., Ivanov, A.R. & Wolf, D.A. Comparative proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 79 (2007).
34. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392 (2002).
35. Cagney, G., Amiri, S., Premawaradena, T., Lindo, M. & Emiti, A. In silico proteome analysis to facilitate proteomics experiments using mass spectrometry. Proteome Sci. 1, 5 (2003).
36. Neidhardt, F.C. & Umbarger, H. E. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology 2nd edn. Vol. 1 (eds. Neidhardt, F.C. et al.) 13-16 (ASM Press, Washington, D.C., 1996).
37. Sundararaj, S. et al. The CyberCell Database (CCDB): A comprehensive, self-updating, relational database to coordinate and facilitate in silico modeling of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D293-D295 (2004).
38. Kal, A.J. et al. Dynamics of gene expression revealed by comparison of serial analysis of gene expression transcript profiles from yeast grown on two different carbon sources. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1859-1872 (1999).
39. Stollberg, J., Urschitz, U., Urban, Z. & Boyd, C.D. A quantitative evaluation of SAGE. Genome Res. 10, 1241-1248 (2000).
40. Velculescu, V.E., Zhang, L., Vogelstein, B. & Kinzler, K.W. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 270, 484-487 (1995).