Phylogenetic Relationships of the Enigmatic Angiosperm Family Podostemaceae Inferred from 18S rDNA andrbcLSequence Data

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 261-272

  Soltis, Douglas E ^a   Mort, Mark E ^a   Soltis, Pamela S ^a   Hibsch Jetter, Carola ^a   Zimmer, Elizabeth A ^b   Morgan, David ^c  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^c WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RBCL PROTEIN, PLASTID; RIBOSOME DNA; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

ANGIOSPERMS; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE;

EID: 0033091945     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0577     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1998.
2. Bull J. J., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W., Swofford D. L., Waddell P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
3. Chase M. W., Albert V. A. A perspective on the contribution of plastidrbcL. Molecular Systematics of Plants II. 1998;Chapman & Hall, New York.
4. Chase M. W., Cox A. V. Gene sequences, collaboration, and analyses of large data sets. Aust. Syst. Bot. 11:1997;215-229.
5. Chase M. W., Soltis D. E., Olmstead R. G., Morgan D., Les D. H., Mishler B. D., Duvall M. R., Price R. A., Hills H. G., Qiu Y.-L., Kron K. A., Rettig J. H., Conti E., Palmer J. D., Manhart J. R., Sytsma K. J., Michaels H. J., Kress W. J., Karol K. G., Clark W. D., Hedrén M., Gaut B. S., Jansen R. K., Kim K.-J., Wimpee C. F., Smith J. F., Furnier G. R., Strauss S. H., Xiang Q.-Y., Plunkett G. M., Soltis P. S., Swensen S. M., Williams S. E., Gadek P. A., Quinn C. J., Eguiarte L. E., Golenberg E., Learn G. H. Jr., Graham S. W., Barrett S. C. H., Dayanandan S., Albert V. A. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:1993;628-580.
6. Crayn D. M., Fernando E. S., Gadek P. A., Quinn C. J. A reassessment of the familial affinities of the Mexican genusRecchia. Brittonia. 47:1995;397-402.
7. Cronquist A. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. 1981;Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
8. Cusset G., Cusset C. Etude sur les Podostemales. 9. Délimitations taxonomiques dans les Tristichaceae. Adansonia. 10:1988;149-177.
9. Dahlgren R. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80:1980;91-124.
10. De Queiroz A., Donoghue M. J., Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:1995;657-681.
11. Graham S. A., Wood C. E. Jr. The Podostemaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold. Arb. 56:1975;456-465.
12. Fay M. F., Swensen S. M., Chase M. W. Taxonomic affinities ofMedusagyne oppositifolia. Kew Bull. 52:1997;111-120.
13. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
14. Fernando E. S., Gadek P. A., Crayn D. M., Quinn C. J. Rosid affinities of Surianaceae: Molecular evidence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1993;344-350.
15. Gene Codes Corporation, 1994, Sequencher 2.1 reference, advanced, user friendly software tools for DNA sequencing, Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI.
16. Hibsch-Jetter C. D., Soltis D. E., MacFarlane T. D. Phylogenetic relationships ofEremosyne pectinatarbcL. Plant Syst. Evol. 206:1997;353-373.
17. Hillis D. M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature. 383:1996;130.
18. Hoot S. B., Culham A., Crane P. R. Phylogenetic relationships of the Lardizabalaceae and Sargentodoxaceae: Chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence evidence. Plant Syst. Evol. 9:1995;195-199.
19. Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J., Cunningham C. W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;152-158.
20. Johnson L. A., Soltis D. E. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto andGiliamatK. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:1995;149-175.
21. Johnson L. A., Soltis D. E. Assessing congruence: Empirical examples from molecular data. Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Doyle J. J. Molecular Systematics of Plants II. 1998;297-348 Chapman & Hall, New York.
22. Kron K. A. Phylogenetic relationships of Empetraceae, Epacridaceae, and Ericaceae: Evidence from nuclear ribosomal 18S sequence data. Ann. Bot. 77:1996;293-303.
23. Les D. H., Philbrick C. T., Novelo R. The phylogenetic position of river-weeds (Podostemaceae): Insights fromrbcL. Aquatic Bot. 57:1997;5-27.
24. Nickrent D. L., Franchina C. R. Phylogenetic relationships of the Santalales and relatives. J. Mol. Evol. 31:1990;294-301.
25. Olmstead R. G., Sweere J. A. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;467-481.
26. Rice K. A., Donoghue M. J., Olmstead R. G. Analyzing large data sets:rbcL. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;554-563.
27. van Royen P. The Podostemaceae of the New World. I. Meded. Bot. Mus. Utrecht. 107:1951;1-151.
28. Shinwari Z. K., Terauchi R., Utech F. H., Kawano S. Recognition of the New WorldDisporumProsartesProsartesrbcL. Taxon. 43:1994;353-366.
29. Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S. Phylogenetic relationships among Saxifragaceae sensu lato: A comparison of topologies based in 18S rDNA andrbcL. Am. J. Bot. 84:1997;504-522.
30. Soltis D. E., Hibsch-Jetter C., Soltis P. S., Chase M. W., Farris J. S. Molecular phylogenetic relationships among angiosperms: An overview based onrbcL. Iwatsuki K., Raven P. H. Evolution and Diversification of Land Plants. 1997b;157-178 Springer, New York.
31. Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Collier T. G., Edgerton M. L. Chloroplast DNA variation within and among genera of theHeuchera. Am. J. Bot. 78:1991;1091-1112.
32. Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Nickrent D. L., Johnson L. A., Hahn W. J., Hoot S. B., Sweere J. A., Kuzoff R. K., Kron K. A., Chase M. W., Swensen S. M., Zimmer E. A., Chaw S.-M., Gillespie L. J., Kress W. J., Sytsma K. J. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 84:1997a;1-49.
33. Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Mort M., Chase M. W., Savolainen V., Hoot S. B., Morton C. M. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;323-342.
34. Sullivan J. Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;375-380.
35. Swofford D. L. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent. Miyamoto M. M., Cracaft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;295-333 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
36. Takhtajan A. L. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46:1980;225-359.
37. Thorne R. F. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58:1992;225-348.
38. Ueda K., Hanyunda T., Nakano A., Shiuchi T., Seo A., Okubo H., Hotta M. Origin of Podostemaceae, a marvelous aquatic flowering plant family. Plant Species Biol. 110:1997;87-92.
39. Willis J. C. A new natural family of flowering plants - Tristichaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 43:1915;49-54.
40. Willis J. C. The evolution of the Tristichaceae and Podostemaceae. Ann. Bot. 40:1926;349-367.