Spanish teachers’ opinions about the use of spanish in mainstream english classrooms before and after their first year in california

Bilingual Research Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 411-433

  Ramos, Francisco ^a  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249131665     PISSN: 15235882     EISSN: 15235890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2005.10162842     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alamillo, L., & Viramontes, C. (2000). Reflections from the classroom: Teacher perspectives on the implementation of Proposition227. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1&2), 155-167.
2. Beckett, A. M. (1997). Pre-kindergarten teachers’ views about the education of language minority students. Education and Practice, 13(1), 64-75.
3. Boletín Oficial del Estado. (2002). Orden de 27 de diciembre de 2001, por la que se convocan plazas para profesores visitantes en centros escolares de los Estados Unidos para el próximo curso 2002/2003. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2002-01-09/pdfs/A01059-01069.pdf
4. Bos, C., & Reyes, E. (1996). Conversations with a Latina teacher about education for language minority students with special needs. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 343-351.
5. California Department of Education. (1993). Memorandum ofunderstanding between the California Department of Education and the Ministry of Education and Science of Spain. Sacramento: Author.
6. California Department of Education. (2004a). Teachers providing ELD, SDAIE, or primary language instruction to English learner students in California public schools. By state 1998-1999. Retrieved May 20, 2005, fromhttp://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/lc/staff/St_LC_tea.asp? cChoice=St_LC_tea&cYear=1998-99&StartSelect=Staff
7. California Department of Education. (2004b). Teachers providing ELD, SDAIE, or primary language instruction to English Learner students in California public schools. State of California 2002-2003. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/lc/staff/ St_teach.asp?cChoice=St_LC_tea&cYear=2002-03
8. California Department of Education. (2004c). English learners, instructional settings and services. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from: http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ElP2_State.asp?RptYear=200304&RptType=ELPart2_1a
9. Crawford, J. (1998). The campaign against Proposition 227: A post-mortem. Bilingual Research Journal, 21(1), 1-29.
10. Crawford, J. (2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom. (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Bilingual Educational Services.
11. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students (pp. 3-49). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
12. de Jong, E., & Ramos, F. (2003). Current English-only initiatives: Misconceptions and broken promises. Sunshine State TESOL Journal, 2(1), 22-32.
13. Díaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (1995). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete K-12 reference guide. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Dixon, C., Green, J., Yeager, B., Baker, D., & Fránquiz, M. (2000). “I used to know that”: What happens when reform gets through the classroom door. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1&2), 113-126.
15. Gándara, P. (2000). In the aftermath of the storm: English learners in the post-227 era. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2), 1-13.
16. Greene, J. (1997). A meta-analysis of the Rossell and Baker review of bilingual education research. Bilingual Research Journal, 21(2&3), 103-122.
17. Grissom, J. B. (2004). Reclassification of English learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(36). Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n36/
18. Jiménez, R., Gersten, R., & Rivera, A. (1996). Conversations with a Chicana teacher: Supporting students’ transition from native to English language instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 333-341.
19. Krashen, S. D. (1996). Under attack: The case against bilingual education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
20. Krashen, S. D. (1998). Heritage-language development: Some practical arguments. In S. Krashen, L. Tse, & J. McQuillan (eds.), Heritage language development (pp. 3-13). Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
21. Krashen, S. D. (1999). Condemned without a trial: Bogus arguments against bilingual education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Lemberger, N. (1992, April). Bilingual teachers’voices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
23. Lemberger, N. (1996, April). How a Spanish bilingual teacher builds community in a Mien bilingual class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
24. McQuillan, J., & Tse, L. (1996). Does research matter? An analysis of media opinion on bilingual education, 1984-1994. Bilingual Research Journal, 20(1), 1-27.
25. Mora, J. K. (1999, January). Teachers’ beliefs about biliteracy instruction: Commonalities, divergence & dilemma. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Bilingual Education, Denver, CO.
26. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2003). How has the English language learner (ELL) student population changed in recent years? The growing numbers of Limited English Proficient students. Retrieved May 23, 2005, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/reports/statedata/2002LEP/Growing_LEP0203.pdf
27. Ovando, C. J., Collier, V P., & Combs, M. C. (2003). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
28. Puente, M. (1998, June 3). English-only supporters rejoice in California [Electronic version]. USA Today. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.onenation.org
29. Ramírez, J. D. (1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal 16(1&2), 1-62.
30. Ramos, F. (2001). Teachers’opinions about the theoretical and practical aspects of the use of native language instruction for language minority students: A cross-sectional study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(3), 357-374.
31. Ramos, F., & de Jong, E. (2003). Reading the fine print: Implications of current English-only initiatives for school personnel. Florida Educational Leadership, 4(1), 13-18.
32. Rueda, R., & García, E. (1996). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy assessment and instruction with language-minority students: A comparative study. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 311-332.
33. Schirling, E., Contreras, F., & Ayala, C. (2000). Proposition 227: Tales from the schoolhouse. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1&2), 127-140.
34. Shin, F., & Krashen, S. (1996). Attitudes toward the principles of bilingual education and toward students’ participation in bilingual programs: Same or different? Bilingual Research Journal, 20(1), 45-53.
35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory-Procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Stritikus, T. & García, E. E. (2000). Education of limited English proficient students in California schools: An assessment of the influence of Proposition 227 on selected teachers and classrooms. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1&2), 75-85.
37. Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2004). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement final report: Project 1.1. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
38. Unz, R. (1997a, October 19). Bilingualism vs bilingual education. Los Angeles Times, p. M6.
39. Unz, R. (1997b). MALDEF questions and answers on the Unz initiative (Response). Retrieved May 22, 2005, from http://onenation.org/ maldefqa.html
40. Unz, R. (1997c). English campaign begins. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.onenation.org/unz101997.html
41. Unz, R., & Tuchman, G. M. (1998). Text of Proposition 227. Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://onenation.org/fulltext.html
42. Willig, A. (1987). Reply to Baker. Review of Educational Research, 57, 363-376.