Reading comprehension of an inferential text by deaf students with cochlear implants using cued speech

Volta Review

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 37-57

  Torres, Santiago ^a   Rodríguez, José Miguel ^a   García Orza, Javier ^a   Calleja, Marina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50549094696     PISSN: 00428639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17955/tvr.108.1.600     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alegría, J. (2004). Deafness and reading. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children's Literacy (pp. 459-489). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
2. Beringer, J. (1999). Experimental Run Time System (ERTS). Frankfurt: BeriSoft Cooperation.
3. Blamey, P., Sarant, J., Paatsch, L., Barry, J., Bow, C., Wales, R., et al. (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 264-285.
4. Bresson, J. (1996). Les jeunes sourds et la lecture. Essai d'évaluation [The young deaf and the reading. Evaluation proof] (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Nancy II).
5. Charlier, B., & Leybaert, J. (2000). The rhyming skills of deaf children educated with phonetically augmented speechreading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53a(2), 349-375.
6. Connor, C.M. (2006). Examining the communication skills of a young cochlear implant pioneer. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 449-460.
7. Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf schoolchild. London: Harper and Row.
8. Cornett, R.O. (1967). Cued speech. American Annals of the Deaf, 112, 3-13.
9. De Vega, M., León, I., & Díaz, J.M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition and emotion, 10(3), 303-321.
10. Descourtieux, C. (2003). Seize ans d'expérience pratique à CODALI: Evaluation-evolutions [Sixteen years of practical experience in CODALI: Evaluation-evolutions]. Actes des Journées d'études Nantes, 40, 77-88.
11. Descourtiex, V., Groh, A., Rusterholtz, I., Simoulin, D., & Busquet, D. (1999). Cued Speech in the stimulation of communication: An advantage in cochlear implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 47, 205-207.
12. Dickinson, D.K, & McCabe, A. (2001). Bringing it all together: The multiple origins, skills, and environmental supports of early literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 186-202.
13. Geers, A. (2006). Spoken language in children with cochlear implants. In P.E. Spencer & M. Marschark (Eds.), Advances in the spoken language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children, (pp. 244-270). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Geers, A., & Moog, J. (1989). Factor predicting the development of literacy in profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents. Volta Review, 91(2), 69-86.
15. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mayberry, R.I. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 222-229.
16. Hage, C., & Leybaert, J. (2006). The effect of cued speech on the development of spoken language. In P.E. Spencer & M. Marschark (Eds.), Advances in the spoken language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children (pp. 193-211). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Harris, M., & Beech, J. (1995). Reading development in prelingually deaf children. In E. Keith & Z. Nelson Reger (Eds.), Children's Language, vol. 8, chap. 9 (pp. 181-203). Hillsdale, New York: LEA.
18. Holt, J.A. (1993). Stanford Achievement Test (8th edition): Reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 172-175.
19. Holt, J.A., Traxler, C.B., & Allen, T.E. (1996). Interpreting the scores: A user's guide to the 9th edition Stanford Achievement Test for educators of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Unpublished manuscript, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.
20. Horga, D., & Liker, M. (2006). Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(2/3), 211-217.
21. Kyle, J.G., & Woll, B. (1985). Language in sign, an international perspective on sign language. London: Croom Helm.
22. Lewis, S. (1998). Reading and writing within an oral/aural approach. In S. Gregory, P. Knigth, W. McCreacken, S. Powers, & L. Watson (Eds.), Issues in deaf education (pp. 101-119). London: David Fulton Publisher.
23. Leybaert, J., & Charlier, B. (1996). Visual speech in the head: The effect of cued-speech on rhyming, remembering and spelling. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 234-248.
24. Lichtenstein, E.H. (1998). The relationships between reading processes and English skills of deaf college students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 80-134.
25. Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in reading: The special case of deaf children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 279-300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
27. Moreno-Torres, I., & Torres, S. (2008). From 1-word to 2-words with cochlear implant and cued speech: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 22(7), 451-508.
28. Mukari, S.Z., Ling, L.N., & Ghani, H.A. (2007). Educational performance of pediatric cochlear implant recipients in mainstream classes. Internacional Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71(2), 231-240.
29. Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can't hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 9-31.
30. Nicholas, J.G., & Geers, A.E. (2006). The process and early outcomes of cochlear implantation by three years of age. In P.E. Spencer & M. Marschark (Eds.), Advances in the spoken language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children (pp. 271-297). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Nicholls, G.H., & Ling, D. (1982). Cued Speech and the reception of spoken language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 262-269.
32. Paul, P., & Jackson, D.W. (1994). Toward a psychology of deafness: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Ramos, J.L., & Cuetos, F. (1999). Evaluacion de los procesos lectores (PROLECSE) [Evaluation of reading processes]. Madrid, Spain: Tea.
35. Rapp, D.N., & Gerrig, R.J. (2002). Readers reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 30, 779-788.
36. Rapp, D.N., & Gerrig, R.J. (2006). Predilections for narratives outcomes: The impact of story context and reader preferences. Memory & Language, 54(1), 54-67.
37. Santana, R., Torres, S., & Garcia, J. (2003). The role of cued speech in the development of Spanish prepositions. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(4), 323-332.
38. Semel, E. Wiig, E.H., & Secord, W.A. (1997). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-3). San Antonio: The Psychological corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company.
39. Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington: National Academy Press.
40. Spencer, P.E. (2004). Individual differences in language performance after cochlear implantation at one to three years of age: Child, family, and linguistic factors. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9(4), 396-412.
41. Svirsky, M.A., Lynne, M.S., Ying, E., Lento, C.L., & Leonard, L. B. (2002). Grammatical morphologic development in pediatric cochlear implant users may be affected by the perceptual prominence of the relevant markers. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 111(5), 109-112.
42. Szagun, G. (2004). Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language, 31, 1-30.
43. Torres, S., & Ruiz, M.J. (1996). La palabra complementada [Cued speech]. Madrid, Spain: CEPE.
44. Torres, S., & Santana, R. (2005). Reading levels of Spanish deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(4), 379-387.
45. Torres, S., Moreno-Torres, I., & Santana, R. (2006). Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of linguistic input support to a prelingually deaf child with cued speech: A case study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(4), 439-448.
46. Traxler, C.B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test (9th Edition): National forming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337-348.
47. Van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Gaddy, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J.C. Otero, J.A. León, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Vieu, A., Mondain, M., Blanchard, K., Sillon, M., Reuillard-Artieres, E., Tobey, A., et al. (1998). Influence of communication mode on speech intelligibility and syntactic structure of sentences in profoundly hearing impaired French children implanted between 5 and 9 years of age. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolangygology, 44(1), 15-22.