A comparison of barley malt quality measurements and malt sugar concentrations

Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 151-161

  Duke, Stanley H ^a   Henson, Cynthia A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b U S DAIRY FORAGE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

amylase; Barley; Diastatic power; Malt extract; Malt sugars; Osmolytes

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM;

EID: 50049096184     PISSN: 03610470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2008-0612-01     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Society of Brewing Chemists. Methods of Analysis, 8th ed. Malt-4 Extract, -6A Diastatic power. The Society, St. Paul, MN. 1992.
2. Anonymous. Diastatic activity (Lintner value). J. Inst. Brew. 12:1-12, 1906.
3. Arends, A. M., Fox, G. P., Henry R. J., Marschke, R. J., and Symons, M. H. Genetic and environmental variation in the diastatic power of Australian barley. J. Cereal Sci. 21:63-70, 1995.
4. Bamforth, C. W. Chemistry and biochemistry for brewers. In: Scientific Principles of Malting and Brewing. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN. Pp. 189-231, 2006.
5. Beers, E. P., and Duke, S. H. Characterization of α-amylase from shoots and cotyledons of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. 92:1154-1163, 1990.
6. Bertoff, E. Lintnerization of two amylose-free starches of A- and B-crystalline types, respectively. Starch/Stärke 56:167-180, 2004.
7. Bewley, J. D., and Black, M. Mobilization of stored seed reserves. In: Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination. Plenum Press, New York. Pp. 253-303, 1985.
8. Briggs, D. E. An introduction to malts and their uses. In: Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic & Professional, London. Pp. 1-33, 1998.
9. Briggs, D. E. Grain physiology. In: Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic & Professional, London. Pp. 79-132, 1998.
10. Briggs, D. E. The biochemistry of malting. In: Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic & Professional, London. Pp. 133-228, 1998.
11. Briggs, D. E. Malt analysis. In: Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic & Professional, London. Pp. 579-614, 1998.
12. Buchholz, K., Kasche, V., and Bornscheuer, U. T. Introduction to enzyme technology. In: Biocatalysts and Enzyme Technology. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany. Pp. 1-26, 2005.
13. Clark, S. E., Hayes, P. M., and Henson, C. A. Effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the β-amylase 1 alleles from barley on functional properties of the enzymes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 41:798-804, 2003.
14. Delcour, J. A., and Verschaeve, S. G. Malt diastatic activity. Part 2: A modified EBC-diastatic power assay for the selective estimation of β-amylase activity. Time and temperature dependence of the release of reducing sugars. J. Inst. Brew. 93:296-301, 1987.
15. Duke, S. H., and Henson, C. A. Green malt osmolyte concentration as an early indicator of finished malt quality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:145-150, 2007.
16. European Brewery Convention. Analytica-EBC. Verlag Hans Carl Geranke-Fachverlag, Nürnberg, Germany, 1998.
17. Evans, D. E., Collins, H., Eglinton, J., and Wilhelmson, A. Assessing the impact of the level of diastatic enzymes and their thermostability on the hydrolysis of starch during wort production to predict malt fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 63:185-198, 2005.
18. Evans, D. E., Li, C., and Eglinton, J. A superior prediction of malt attenuation. In: Proc. 31st Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. Venice. Verlag Hans Carl Geranke-Fachverlag, Nürnberg, Germany. Pp. 54-66, 2007.
19. Gibson, T. S., Solah, V., Glennie Holmes, M. R., and Taylor, H. R. Diastatic power in malted barley: Contributions of malt parameter to its development and the potential of barley grain β-amylase to predict malt diastatic power. J. Inst. Brew. 101:227-280, 1995.
20. Hall, R. D., Harris, G., and MacWilliam, I. C. Carbohydrates in malting and brewing V. Further studies on the carbohydrates of barley, malt and wort. J. Inst. Brew. 62:232-238, 1956.
21. Hayes, P. M., Castro, A., Marquez-Cedillo, L., Corey, A., Henson, C., Jones, B. L., Kling, J., Mather, D., Matus, I., and Sato, K. Genetic diversity for quantitatively inherited agronomic and malting traits. In: Diversity in Barley (Horedum vulgare). R. von Bothmer, T. van Hintum, and K. Sato, eds. Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam. Pp. 201-226, 2003.
22. Henson, C. A., and Duke, S. H. Osmolyte concentration as an indicator of malt quality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:59-62, 2007.
23. Henson, C. A., and Duke, S. H. A comparison of standard and nonstandard measures of malt quality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 66:11-19, 2008.
24. Henson, C. A., Duke, S. H., Schwarz, P., and Horsley, R. Barley seed osmolyte concentration as an indicator of preharvest sprouting. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:125-128, 2007.
25. Henson, C. A., and Livingston, D. P., III. Characterization of a fructan exohydrolase purified from barley stems that hydrolyzes multiple fructofuranosidic linkages. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36:715-720, 1998.
26. Institute of Brewing, Analysis Committee of the IoB. Recommended Methods of Analysis. IoB, London, 1998.
27. Kakefuda, G., and Duke, S. H. Characterization of pea chloroplast D-enzyme (4-α-D-glucanotransferase). Plant Physiol. 91:136-143, 1989.
28. Kuntz, R. J., and Bamforth, C. W. Time course for the development of enzymes in barley. J. Inst. Brew. 113:196-205, 2007.
29. Kunze, W. Malt production 2.8.3.2 Congress mash. In: Technology Brewing and Malting. VLB Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 157-159, 1999.
30. Lintner, C. J. Studien über diastase. J. Prakt. Chem. 34:378-394, 1886.
31. Lizotte, P. A., Henson, C. A., and Duke, S. H. Purification and characterization of pea epicotyl β-amylase. Plant Physiol. 92:615-621, 1990.
32. Marchal, L. M., Jonkers, J., and Tramper, J. The use of freezing-point depression for the theoretical dextrose equivalent measurement. Starch/Stärke 48:220-224, 1996.
33. Marchai, L. M., and Tramper, J. Hydrolytic gain during hydrolysis reactions: Implications and correction procedures. Biotechnol. Tech. 13:325-328, 1999.
34. Muslin, E. H., Karpelenia, C. B., and Henson, C. A. The impact of thermostable α-glucosidase on the production of fermentable sugars during mashing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 61:142-145, 2003.
35. Payen, A., and Persoz, J. F. Mémoire sur la diastase, les principaux produits de ses réactions, et leurs applications aux art industriels. Ann. Chim. Physiol. 2me Sér. 53:73-92, 1833.
36. Schwarz, P. B., Li, Y., Barr, J., and Horsley, R. D. Effect of operational parameters on the determination of laboratory extract and associated wort quality factors. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:219-228, 2007.
37. Sopanen, T., and Laurière, C. Release and activity of bound β-amylase in germinating barley grain. Plant Physol. 89:244-249, 1989.
38. Statistical Analysis System. SAS Users Guide: Statistics, version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 2003.
39. Sun, Z., and Henson, C. A. Degradation of native starch granules by barley α-glucosidases. Plant Physiol. 94:320-327, 1990.
40. Sun, Z., and Henson, C. A. A quantitative assessment of the importance of barley seed α-amylase, β-amylase, debranching enzyme, and α-glucosidase in starch degradation. Archiv. Biochem. Biophys. 284:298-305, 1991.
41. Ullrich, S. E., Han, F., and Jones, B. L. Genetic complexity of the malt extract trait in barley suggested by QTL analysis. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 55:1-4, 1997.
42. Zhang, G., Vankatachalam, M., and Hamaker, B. R. Structural basis for slow digestion property of native cereal starches. Biomacromolecules 7:3259-3266, 2006.