Differential ability and attainment in language and arithmetic of Dutch primary school pupils

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 491-506

  Mooij, Ton ^a,b   Driessen, Geert ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; CHILD; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICS; NETHERLANDS; SCHOOL; STUDENT;

ACHIEVEMENT; APTITUDE; CHILD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICS; NETHERLANDS; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS;

EID: 49949084269     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709907X235981     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allison, P. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93-114.
2. Arbeitsgruppe Schulforschung (1980). Leistung und Ver-sagen [Performance and failure]. München, Germany: Juventa.
3. Bennathan, M., & Boxall, M. (1996). Effective intervention in primary schools. Nurture groups. London: David Fulton.
4. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., & Peetsma, T. (2006). Het nieuwe leren in het basisonderwijs; Een begripsanalyse en een verkenning van de schoolpraktijk [New learning in primary education; Conceptual analysis and an exploration into school practice]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamminstituut.
5. Boyd, L. H., & Iversen, G. R. (1979). Contextual analysis: Concepts and statistical techniques. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6. Brown, S. W., Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C.-H. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 68-79.
7. Campbell, R., Muijs, R., Neelands, J., Robinson, W., Eyre, D., & Hewston, R. (2005). The social origins of students identified as gifted and talented in England: A geo-demographic analysis. Coventry: NAGTY, University of Warwick.
8. Cigman, R. (2006). The gifted child: A conceptual enquiry. Oxford Review of Education, 32, 197-212.
9. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (2004). A nation deceived. How schools hold back America's brightest students (Volumes I and II). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa, International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
10. Collier, G. (1994). Social origins of mental ability. New York: Wiley.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1983). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Davis, J. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17-31.
13. Driesscn, G., Mooij, T., & Doesborgh, J. (2007). Hoogbegaafdheid van Leerlingen in het Primair Onderwijs: ontwikkelingen en samenhangen met kenmerken van thuis, de groep en de school [Gifted Pupils in Primary Education: Developments and correlations with characteristics of the home, the class and school]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
14. Driessen, G., van Langen, A., & Vierke, H. (2004). Basisonderwijs: Veldwerkverslag, leerlinggegevens en oudervragenlijsten. Basisrapportage PRIMA-cohortonderzoek. Vijfde meting 2002/03 [Primary Education: Data collection, pupil data and parent questionnaires. Technical report PRIMA cohort study. Fifth measurement round 2002/03]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
15. Driessen, G., van Langen, A., & Vierke, H. (2006). Basisonderwijs: Veldwerkverslag, leerlinggegevens en oudervragenlijsten. Basisrapportage PRIMA-cohort-onder-zoek. Zesde meting 2004/05 [Primary Education: Data collection, pupil data and parent questionnaires. Technical report PRIMA cohort study. Sixth measurement round 2004/05]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
16. Durkin, D. (1966). Children who read early. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Earle, R. S. (Ed.). (2000). Standards for the accreditation of programs in educational communications and instructional technology (ECIT) (4th Rev. ed., October 2001). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
18. Freeman, J., & Josepsson, B. (2002). A gifted programme in Iceland and its effects. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 35-46.
19. Gallagher, J. (1975). Teaching the gifted child. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
20. Grayson, J. P (2001). The performance of 'gifted' high school students in university. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, (31), 121-139.
21. Guldemond, H., Bosker, R., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2003). Hoogbegaafden in het voortgezet onderwijs [Gifted Students in Secondary Education]. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION.
22. Heckhausen, H. (1980). Motivation und Handeln: Lehrbuch der Motivationspsychologie [Motivation and action: Handbook of motivational psychology]. Berlin: Springer.
23. Heinbokel, A. (1988). Hochbegabte. Erkennen, Probleme, Lösungswege [Gifted persons: Diagnostics, problems, solutions]. Frankfurt, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung.
24. Hewston, R., Campbell, R., Eyre, E., Muijs, D., Neelands, J., & Robinson, W. (2005). A baseline review of the literature on effective pedagogies for gifted and talented students. Warwick: University of Warwick.
25. Jamieson, J. (1999). Dealing with baseline differences: Two principles and two dilemmas. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 155-161.
26. Kokkinos, C. M. (2007). Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 229-243.
27. Marsh, H., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
28. Mehlhorn, H.-G. (1988). Persönlichkeitsentwicklung Hochbegabter [Personality development of gifted persons]. Berlin: Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag.
29. Minne, B., Rensman, M., Vroomen, B., & Webbink, D. (2007). Excellence for productivity. The Hague, The Netherlands: CPB. Accessed July 2nd 2007 at http://www.cpb.nl/nl/pub/ cpbreeksen/bijzonder/69/bijz69pdf
30. Mooij, T. (1992). Predicting (under)achievement of gifted children. European Journal for High Ability, 3, 59-74.
31. Mooij, T (1999). Integrating gifted children into kindergarten by improving educational processes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 63-74.
32. Mooij, T. (2000). Screening children's entry characteristics in kindergarten. Early Child Development and Care, 165, 23-40.
33. Mooij, T (2007). Design of educational and ICT conditions to integrate differences in learning: Contextual learning theory and a first transformation step in early education. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1499-1530.
34. Mooij, T, Hoogeveen, L., Driessen, G., van Hell, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Eindverslag van het Onderzoek naar Succescondities voor Onderwijs aan Hoogbegaafde Leerlingen [End Report Study into Success Conditions of Education for Gifted Pupils]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud Universiteit, ITS/CBO/Afdeling Orthopedagogiek.
35. Mooij, T, & Smeets, E. (2006). Design, development and implementation of inclusive education. European Educational Research Journal, 5, 94-109.
36. Onderwijsraad (2004). Hoe Kan Onderwijs Meer Betekenen voor Jongeren? Advies [How can Education Mean More for Youngsters? Recommendations]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Onderwijsraad.
37. Poulou, M. (2007). Social resilience within a social and emotional learning framework: The perceptions of teachers in Greece. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 12(2), 87-104.
38. Purcell, J. H., Burns, D. E., Tomlinson, C. A., Imbeau, M. B., & Martin, J. L. (2002). Bridging the gap: A tool and technique to analyze and evaluate gifted education curricular units. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(4), 306-321.
39. Rost, D. H. (Ed.). (1993). Lebensumweltanalyse hochbegabter Kinder. Das Marburger Hochbegabtenprojekt [Analysing the life environment of gifted children. The Marburg project for the gifted]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
40. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1980). Fifteen thousand hours. West Compton House, Nr. Shepton Mallet, UK: Open Books.
41. Solberg, M. E., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (2007). Bullies and victims: Are they the same pupils? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 441-464.
42. Strand, S. (2006). Identifying Gifted Students: An evaluation of the National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth (NAGTY) procedure. Coventry: NAGTY, University of Warwick.
43. Tesser, P, & Iedema, J. (2001). Rapportage minderheden 2001. Deel I. Vorderingen op school [Report on Ethnic Minorities. Part 1. Attainments in Education]. The Hague, The Netherlands: SCR
44. van der Veen, I., van der Meijden, A., & Ledoux, G. (2004). School- en Klaskenmerken Basisonderwijs. Basisrapportage PRIMA-cohortonderzoek. Vijfde meting 2002-2003 [School and Class Characteristics Primary Education. Technical report PRIMA cohort study. Fifth measurement round 2002-2003]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.
45. van Eijl, P., Wientjes, H., Wolfensberger, M., & Pilot, A. (2005). Het Uitdagen van Talent in Onderwijs [Challenging Talents in Education], in Onderwijsraad, Onderwijs in Thema's. The Hague, The Netherlands: Onderwijsraad.
46. VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. D. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211.
47. Willett, J. (1989). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. Review of Educational Research, 15, 345-422