Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 213-225

  Nelson, Craig E ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49449093742     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: 15577023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icn027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (75)

1. Alberts B. 2005. A wakeup call for science faculty. Cell 123:739-741.
2. Alters BJ. 2005. Teaching biological evolution in higher education: methodological, religious and nonreligious issues. Sudbury (MA): Jones and Bartlett.
3. Alters BJ, Nelson CE. 2002. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution 56:1891-1901.
4. Anderson DL, Fisher KM, Norman GJ. 2002. Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. J Res Sci Teach 39:952-978.
5. Angelo TA, Cross KP. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques. 2nd Edition. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass.
6. Arons AB. 1997. Teaching introductory physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Baxter Magolda MB. 1999. Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship: constructive developmental pedagogy. Nashville (TN): Vanderbilt University Press.
8. Baxter Magolda MB. 2004. Making their own way: narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Sterling (VA): Stylus Publishing.
9. Behe MJ. 1996. Darwin's black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press.
10. Behe MJ. 2003. The modern intelligent design hypothesis: breaking rules. In: Manson NA, editor. God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. London: Routledge. p. 277-291.
11. Belenky M, Clinchy B, Goldberger N, Tarule J. 1986. Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
12. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education. 1999. Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
13. Cooper J, Robinson P. 1997. Small-group instruction: an annotated bibliography of science, mathematics, engineering and technology resources in higher education. Available from: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/CL/ resource/R1.asp
14. Cooper J, Robinson P. 1998. Small-group instruction in science, mathematics, engineering and technology (SMET) disciplines: a status report and an agenda for the future. Available from: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/ CL/resource/smallgrp.htm
15. Crouch CH, Mazur E. 2001. Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Amer J Physics 69:970-977.
16. Dobzhansky T. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Amer Biol Teacher 35:125-129.
17. Donovan MS, Bransford JD, editors. 2005. How students learn: science in the classroom. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
18. Duit R. 2007. Bibliography - STCSE: students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Available from: www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse. html
19. Duit R, Treagust DF. 2003. Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. Int J Sci Educ 25:671-688.
20. Finster DC. 1991. Developmental instruction: part II. Application of the Perry model to general chemistry. J Chem Educ 68:753.
21. Finster DC. 1992. New pathways for teaching chemistry: reflective judgment in science. Liberal Educ 78:14-19.
22. Flammer L, Beard J, Nickels MK, Nelson CE, editors. 2007. Evolution and the nature of science institutes. Available from: http://www.indiana.edu/ ~ensiweb/home.html
23. Fullilove RE, Treisman PU. 1990. Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: an evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program. J Negro Educ 59:463-478.
24. Gardiner LF. 1994. Redesigning higher education: producing dramatic gains in student learning. Washington (DC): George Washington University.
25. Gould, SJ, editor. 2001. The book of life. New York: WW Norton.
26. Hake RR. 1998. Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am J Phys 66:64-74.
27. Hake RR. 2002. Lessons from the physics-education-reform effort. Ecol Soc 5. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art28/
28. Handelsman J et al. 2004. Scientific teaching. Science 304:521-522.
29. Herreid CF. 2004. Using case studies in science - and still "covering the content". In: Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD, editors. Team-based learning. Sterling (VA): Stylus. p. 205-114.
30. Herron JD. 1975. Piaget for chemists: explaining what "good" students cannot understand. J Chem Educ 52:146-150.
31. Herron JD. 1978. Piaget in the classroom: guidelines for applications. J Chem Educ 55:165-170.
32. Hofer B, Pintrich P. 1997. The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev Educ Res 67:88-140.
33. Ingram EL, Nelson CE. 2005. Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. J Res Sci Teach 43:7-24.
34. Jacobs DC. 2000. An alternative approach to general chemistry: addressing the needs of at-risk students with cooperative learning strategies. Available from http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/djacobs/index2.htm
35. King PM, Kitchner KS. 1994. Developing reflexive judgment: understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
36. Kloss RJ. 1994. A nudge is best: helping students through the Perry scheme of intellectual development. Coll Teach 42:151-158.
37. Laws P. 1991. Calculus-based physics without lectures. Phys Today 44:24-31.
38. Laws P. 1997. Millikan Lecture 1996: promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses. Am J Phys 65:13-21.
39. Lawson AE. 1983. Predicting science achievement: the role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs. J Res Sci Teach 20:117-129.
40. Matsumura M. 1995. Voices for evolution. Revised edition. Berkeley (CA): National Center for Science Education.
41. Matzke N. 2006. Flagellum evolution in Nature Reviews Microbiology. The Panda's Thumb: Entry 2576. Available from: http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/ 2006/09/flagellum_evolu.html
42. McKeachie WJ, Lin YG, Strayer J. 2002. Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. Am Biol Teacher 64:189-192.
43. Michael JA, Modell HI. 2003. Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms, a working model for helping the learner to learn. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Miller KR. 1999. Finding Darwin's God: a scientist's search for common ground between God and evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books.
45. Miller KR. 2003. Answering the biochemical argument from design. In: Manson NA, editor. God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. London: Routledge. p. 292-307.
46. Mindell DP. 2006. The evolving world: evolution in everyday life. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
47. Nelson CE. 1986. Creation, evolution, or both? A multiple model approach. In: Hanson RW, editor. Science and creation: geological, theological, and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan. p. 128-159.
48. Nelson CE. 1996. Student diversity requires different approaches to college teaching, even in math and science. Am Behav Sci 40:165-175.
49. Nelson CE. 1999. On the persistence of unicorns: the tradeoff between content and critical thinking revisited. In: Pescosolido BA, Aminzade R, editors. The social worlds of higher education: handbook for teaching in a new century. Thousand Oaks (CA): Pine Forge Press.
50. Nelson CE. 2000. Effective strategies for teaching evolution and other controversial subjects. In: Skehan JW, Nelson CE, editors. The creation controversy and the science classroom. Arlington (VA): NSTA Press. p. 19-50.
51. Nelson CE. 2001. What is the most difficult step we must take to become great teachers?" National Teaching Learning Forum 10:10-11.
52. Nelson CE, Nickels MK. 2001. Using humans as a central example in teaching undergraduate biology labs. Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching 22:332-365.
53. Nickels MK, Nelson CE. 2005. Beware of nuts and bolts: putting evolution back into the teaching of classification. Am Biol Teacher 67:289-295.
54. Nickels MN, Nelson CE, Beard J. 1996. Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teacher 58:332-336.
55. Pascarella ET, Terenzini PT. 2005. How college affects students: a third decade of research. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
56. Perry WG Jr. 1970. Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years, a scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
57. Perry WG Jr. 1981. Cognitive and ethical growth: the making of meaning. In: Chickering AW, editor. The modern American college. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass. p. 76-116.
58. Project Kaleidoscope. 2008. Pedagogies. Available from: http://www.pkal.org/keywords/Pedagogies.cfm
59. Scharmann LC. 2005. A proactive strategy for teaching evolution. Am Biol Teacher 67:12-16.
60. Scharmann LC, Smith MU, James MC, Jensen M. 2005. Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellalogy. J Sci Teacher Educ 16:27-41.
61. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. 1997. Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.
62. Sinatra GM, Brem SK, Evans EM. 2008. Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach. 1. [Published online 12 February 2008].
63. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. 2005. Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ 94:87-101.
64. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS. 1997. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology, a meta-analysis. Madison (WI): National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin.
65. Sundberg MD. 2003. Strategies to help students change naive alternative conceptions about evolution and natural selection. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 23(2). Available from: http://www.ncseweb.org/ newsletter.asp?curiss=38
66. Sundberg MD, Dini ML. 1993. Science majors vs nonmajors: is there a difference? J Coll Sci Teach. 22:299-304.
67. Sundberg MD, Dini ML, Li E. 1994. Improving student comprehension and attitudes in freshman biology by decreasing course content. J Res Sci Teach 31:679-693.
68. Terenzini PT, Pascarella ET. 1994. Living with myths: undergraduate education in America. Change 26:28-32.
69. Treisman U. 1992. Studying students studying calculus: a look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. Coll Math J 23:362-372.
70. Verhey SD. 2005a. The effect of engaging prior learning on students' attitudes towards creationism and evolution. Bioscience 55:996-1003.
71. Verhey SD. 2005b. Correction. Bioscience 56:285.
72. Wilson DS. 2005. Evolution for everyone: how to increase acceptance of, interest in, and knowledge about evolution. Available from Public Library Sci Biol: http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10. 1371/journal.pbio.0030364
73. Wilson DS. 2007. Evolution for everyone: how Darwin's theory can change the way we think about our lives. New York: Delacorte Press.
74. Zielinski TJ. 1995. Promoting higher-order thinking skills: uses of Mathcad and classical chemical kinetics to foster student development. J Chem Educ 72:631-38.
75. Zimmerman M. 2006. The clergy letter project. [cited August 6, 2007]. [Accessed August 6, 2007, from Butler University.] Available from: http://www.butler.edu/clergyproject/religion_science_collaboration.htm