Prediction of protein-protein interactions using distant conservation of sequence patterns and structure relationships

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 3360-3368

  Espadaler, Jordi ^a   Romero Isart, Oriol ^b,c   Jackson, Richard M ^b   Oliva, Baldo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC DATABASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ONTOGENY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 24044500970     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti522     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aloy,P. and Russell,R.B. (2003) InterPreTS: Protein interaction prediction through tertiary structure. Bioinformatics, 19, 161-162.
2. Aloy,P. and Russell,R.B. (2004) Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 1317-1321.
3. Aloy,P. et al. (2003) The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 332, 989-998.
4. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
5. Andreeva,A. et al. (2004) SCOP database in 2004: Refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D226-D229.
6. Apweiler,R. et al. (2004) UniProt: The Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D115-D119.
7. Bader,J.S. et al. (2004) Gaining confidence in high-throughput protein interaction networks. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 78-85.
8. Bornberg-Bauer,E. et al. (2005) The evolution of domain arrangements in proteins and interaction networks. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 62, 435-445.
9. Dandekar,T. et al. (1998) Conservation of gene order: A fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci., 23, 324-328.
10. Deng,M. et al. (2004) Mapping Gene Ontology to proteins based on protein-protein interaction data. Bioinformatics, 20, 895-902.
11. Eddy,S.R. (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 14, 755-763.
12. Espadaler,J. et al. (2005) Detecting remotely related proteins by their interactions and sequence similarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7151-7156.
13. Eswar,N. et al. (2003) Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3375-3380.
14. Gavin,A.C. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415, 141-147.
15. Hill,D.P. et al. (2002) Extension and integration of the Gene Ontology (GO): Combining GO vocabularies with external vocabularies. Genome Res., 12, 1982-1991.
16. Keskin,O. et al. (2004) A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein-protein interfaces and its implications. Protein Sci., 13, 1043-1055.
17. Li,H. et al. (2004a) Discovery of binding motif pairs from protein complex structural data and protein interaction sequence data. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 312-323.
18. Li,X. et al. (2004b) Protein-Protein interactions: Hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: Implications for docking. J. Mol. Biol., 344, 781-795.
19. Lu,L. et al. (2002) Multiprospector: An algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by multimeric threading Proteins, 49, 350-364.
20. Ma,B. et al. (2003) Protein-protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 5772-5777.
21. Marcotte,E. et al. (1999) Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science, 285, 751-753.
22. Matthews,L. et al. (2001) Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or 'interologs'. Genome Res., 11, 2120-2126.
23. Mering,C.V. et al. (2003) STRING: A database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 258-261.
24. Mewes,H.W. et al. (2004) MIPS: Analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D41-D44.
25. Nye,T.M. et al. (2005) Statistical analysis of domains in interacting protein pairs. Bioinformatics, 21, 993-1001.
26. Pellegrini,M. et al. (1999) Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 4285-4288.
27. Peri,S. et al. (2004) Human protein reference database as a discovery resource for proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D497-D501.
28. Russell,R. and Barton,G. (1992) Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: Assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins, 14, 309-323.
29. Salwinski,L. et al. (2004) The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D449-D451.
30. Tsai,C.J. et al. (1996) A dataset of protein-protein interfaces generated with a sequence-order-independent comparison technique. J. Mol. Biol., 260, 604-620.
31. Uetz,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623-627.
32. Von Mering,C. et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature, 417, 399-403.
33. Von Mering,C. et al. (2003) Genome evolution reveals biochemical networks and functional modules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100 15428-15433.